Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

X wants to stop creators from farming stolen viral clips for easy money

The platform is reducing payouts for users accused of reposting stolen content and gaming engagement.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Twitter X Logo Featured Banner
X

For years now, X has quietly rewarded one of the internet’s most annoying business models: stealing someone else’s content, reposting it faster, slapping “BREAKING” on top, and farming millions of impressions before the original creator even realizes what happened. Now, the platform finally seems ready to crack down on that entire ecosystem.

X says repost farmers and clickbait accounts are losing payouts

According to X’s head of product, Nikita Bier, the company is now actively targeting large accounts that have been “programmatically reuploading content from smaller accounts” to game X’s creator revenue-sharing system. The platform says it will now redirect impressions and monetization benefits back toward original creators instead of repost aggregators.

Over the past month, we have identified a number of large accounts that have been programmatically reuploading content from smaller accounts to game the revenue share program and circumvent crediting the original author.

We are now identifying these posts and allocating the…

— Nikita Bier (@nikitabier) May 23, 2026

Bier says X has already started identifying accounts abusing the system and reducing their payouts aggressively. In some cases, repeat offenders reportedly saw creator revenue slashed by as much as 90 percent. The crackdown also appears to target accounts endlessly flooding timelines with clickbait headlines, recycled videos, rage-bait engagement posts, and rapid-fire aggregation. X says creators adding commentary should instead use proper “Quote” or “Share Video” features so attribution still benefits the original uploader.

X accidentally monetized content theft for years

The funny thing is that this problem was never exactly hidden. The moment X started paying creators primarily based on impressions and engagement, the platform quickly became flooded with repost accounts farming viral videos, rage-bait politics, AI slop, crypto spam, and recycled posts designed purely to chase monetization payouts.

And honestly, X helped create the perfect incentive structure for all of it. Reposting someone else’s content was often faster, easier, and more profitable than making anything original in the first place. That’s exactly why this crackdown probably had to happen eventually, because if actual creators stop benefiting from their own work, the platform slowly turns into an endless feed of stolen content fighting for ad revenue.

Varun Mirchandani
Varun is an experienced technology journalist and editor with over eight years in consumer tech media. His work spans…
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more