Skip to main content

Wikipedia has a gender problem – can it be fixed?

wikipedia equalityWikipedia’s editors have always skewed male, but an illustrator named Santiago Ortiz recently made a chart visualizing how rarely female editors update the Wikipedia page compared to their male counterparts.

This newest digital representation of the gender disparity on Wikipedia drives home the larger problem of having primarily male-driven content – without a more even distribution, topics more popular with men get a disproportionate amount of attention compared to topics that tend to draw female interest. When 9 out of 10 Wikipedia editors are male, women-centric topics can be slighted, and the impartiality of the site is compromised. The inclusion of traditionally feminine topics has incited debate, like when editors tussled over whether an article on Kate Middleton’s wedding dress should be deleted.

Sue Gardner outlined some of the issues women have with Wikipedia in a 2011 blog post called “Nine Reasons Women Don’t Edit Wikipedia,”  and they’re all still relevant problems. And Gardner should know – she’s the executive director of Wikimedia, the non-profit arm of Wikipedia. She used conversations with many different women as the basis of her post, transcribing the reasons women told her they stayed off the site. They ranged from a lack of free time compared to men, to a perception of Wikipedia’s culture as misogynistic, overly sexual, and conflict-based.

There are myriad reasons why women aren’t drawn to Wikipedia in the same way men are, but whatever their reasons, it’s damaging the quality of the site. New York Times columnist Amanda Filipacci recently pointed out what this imbalance is doing to the female novelists section of the website – she penned an op-ed highlighting how female writers can be ghettoized on the site.

But what can be done about this problem, and are any of the root causes fixable?

Lots of effort, little success (so far)

There are groups attempting to right this gender disparity, like the WikiWomen’s Collaborative, an offshoot of Wikimedia devoted to inspiring and encouraging women to participate on the website. “The WikiWomen’s Collaborative conducts outreach programs to attract women to Wikipedia, writes blog posts to celebrate the success of these outreach events, interviews successful WikiWomen and share their stories with the public,” says Netha Hussein, a volunteer with WikiWomen’s Collaborative.

And this includes a social media component, since they also use Facebook and Twitter to share content and conduct surveys. And they also up the ante during women’s history month: “WikiWomen’s Collaborative conducts edit-a-thons and workshops during women’s history month to involve more women in Wikipedia.”

Even more outreach on the horizon

The workshops during women’s history month (which is in March) are one of the cornerstone projects the WikiWomen’s Collaborative works on, but it’s just one of many continued projects in their attempt to boost female engagement. “The most important project as of now is the evaluation of the work done during the women’s history month,” says Hussein. “We are in the process of measuring the success of the various activities we conducted during March. I am involved in writing reports of the Indian events that happened during Women’s History Month. Some of us are actively engaged in promoting our goals at Wikimania, the annual conference of Wikimedians by presenting papers about gender gap and conducting surveys among the attendees.”

So once they figure out whether their efforts during women’s history month yielded success, they may know how to change their campaigns in the future to become more effective. If not, charts like Ortiz’s will continue to showcase the problem with Wikipedia.

However, don’t despair – there’s already proof that pointing out the problem will help alleviate it, at least a little bit. The issue Filipacci had with the way American novelists were sorted on Wikipedia – with people like Harper Lee stuck in the “American Women Novelists” section instead of appearing on the main page – has already been corrected. If people keep calling attention to the problem, it may be the most effective way to both draw some more female editors and make male editors more aware of their bias.

Editors' Recommendations

Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Over 100 more Best Buy Black Friday deals just went live
Digital Trends Best Black Friday Best Buy Deals

Best Buy is one of the key retailers when it comes to offering fantastic Black Friday deals. That means it's the perfect place to check out awesome TV deals, laptop deals, and even great sales on appliances too. With hundreds of options newly available, we've helped you out by picking out some highlights. Below, you'll find all the best Best Buy Black Friday deals on TVs, laptops, gaming PCs, headphones, appliances, and other items too.

Best Buy Black Friday TV deals

Read more
The 32 best early Walmart Black Friday deals still available
Digital Trends Best Black Friday Walmart Deals

Black Friday isn’t far off, and we’ve already seen a huge rush of early Black Friday deals from numerous retailers. You may be wondering if there are still any early Black Friday deals to capitalize on, and the answer is yes. Walmart is one of the most popular retailers when it comes to landing a good deal amongst the Black Friday sales, and there are a lot of deals available to shop there. From TVs to laptops and from small appliances to mattresses, we’ve tracked down all of the best Walmart Black Friday deals you can shop right now.

From an already cheap sticker price of $198, it’s available for just $148, so if you want an upgrade for your home theater setup but you’re on a tight budget, you won't want to miss out on this bargain. Heck, at under $150, it's worth buying just to put in the spare room.

Read more
These are the best microphones for streaming you can buy
Elgato Wave 3 microphone on a desk.

Streaming is as popular today as it's ever been, and if you're interested in giving it a go, you'll need a good microphone for the job. A solid gaming headset will do the trick, but a decent mic will be your best bet. The question is: Do you need to pay for a premium model? Not all mics are built the same, and some are better for the casual environment of streaming than others.

Here are the best microphones for streaming you can buy, with recommendation for a range of price options and use cases.

Read more