NHTSA misses rearview camera legislation deadline

By Stephen Edelstein January 3, 2013

While all eyes were on the “fiscal cliff” negotiations, another organ of the federal government was doing a little procrastination of its own. Just a couple of weeks ago, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said we wanted a bill mandating rearview cameras in all new cars ready to go by December 31. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the White House missed the deadline.

The bill was supposed to finalize rules for the implementation of a rearview camera mandate. This is the fourth time the NHTSA has failed to meet one of its own deadlines on this matter since Congress approved the rearview camera proposal in 2007.

“The department remains committed to improving rearview visibility for the nation’s fleet and will issue a final rule upon completion of the regulatory review process,” an NHTSA statement reported by the Detroit News said.

The bill is currently in limbo; it is under review by the White House Office of Management and Budget, but no new deadline has been set.

Despite the delays, the NHTSA believes rearview cameras are the best way to prevent drivers from hitting pedestrians and obstacles while backing up.

The NHTSA said that about 100 children age five or younger die in “backover” accidents annually. A previous report stated that 300 total fatalities occurred annually, along with 16,000 injuries.

The agency said rearview cameras could prevent between 95 and 112 fatalities per year, and between 7,072 and 8,374 injuries.

Cameras would also increase a new car’s MSRP. According to the NHTSA, they would add between $58 and $88 to the cost of a new car with a car with a display screen, and between $159 and $203 to a car without a display screen.

The NHTSA calculates that the rearview camera proposal would cost between $11.8 million and $19.7 million per life saved.

A previous study by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers put the cost of implementing rearview camera legislation at $11 million, compared to $9.8 million for roof strength regulations and less than $4 million for side impact regulations.

Stephen Edelstein

Contributing Editor

Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…

Cars

Don’t let the gimmicks fool you. The Ioniq 5 N is a serious track car

2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N drifting.

We’re finally getting to the fun part of automakers’ methodical quest to replicate their lineups with electric cars.

Performance versions of ordinary cars have been a staple of the auto industry for decades. But while we’ve already seen some variants of EVs boasting more power and more impressive stats — think Tesla Model S Plaid or Lucid Air Sapphire — the 2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5 N is the first to truly apply that format to an EV.

Cars

The Maserati GranCabrio Folgore is one of the best-looking EVs yet

Front of the Maserati GranCabrio Folgore

Maserati is adopting electrified vehicles with open arms, and while that could potentially signal an identity crisis for the luxury Italian brand, that’s probably a good thing in the long run.

The company recently took the wraps off of the new Maserati GranCabrio Folgore, which is essentially a convertible version of its already released GranTurismo Folgore electric car. The new EV is its third go at electrified vehicles so far, and it flew us out to Rimini, Italy, to witness the big reveal in person.

Cars

EV warranties aren’t like those for non-electric cars. Here’s what you should know

Close up of the Hybrid car electric charger station with power supply plugged into an electric car being charged.

EVs are on the rise. With awesome new models finally rolling out and charging networks rapidly expanding, it feels like we're at the tipping point of electric cars being as mainstream as non-electric vehicles. But with a whole new type of vehicle come new challenges. One challenge is adapting to charging times. Another is paying closer to attention to range. And another, as some drivers are finding out, has to do with electric car warranties.

Turns out, the warranty that comes with electric cars isn't necessarily quite the same as the one that you might get with your non-electric car. If you really think about it, that's probably not all that surprising -- after all, while they can look the same, electric cars have a completely different makeup under the hood compared to their gas-powered cousins. But understanding an EV warranty could be the difference between winding up having to pay thousands for a battery replacement, or getting one repaired on the house.
It's not all new
Before diving into things like battery warranties, it's worth doing a quick primer on car warranties in general. EVs and internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles usually come with two different warranties -- at least when they're bought new. First, there's the basic warranty (also known as bumper-to-bumper warranty), which covers every part of a car except for basic maintenance, usually for up to three years or 36,000 miles.