Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Security researchers publish code that can be used to exploit BadUSB flaw

Add as a preferred source on Google

Adam Caudill and Brandon Wilson, a pair of security researchers, published code that could be used to exploit a security flaw dubbed BadUSB.

BadUSB, which was detailed earlier this year by researchers from German firm SR Labs, could be exploited to infect a computer with malicious code and software. However, SR Labs stopped short of releasing code to the public as Caudill and Wilson did. SR Labs opted not to release code in order to give companies that make firmware which controls USB devices time to figure out how to combat the threat posed by BadUSB.

Recommended Videos

Caudill and Wilson believe that by releasing the code to the public, it could force tech firms to scramble and tighten security on USB devices at a faster rate.

While speaking with the BBC, Karsten Nohl of SR Labs said that this move could have the desired effect, but also warned that addressing such a problem is a bit more complex than one might think.

“In the case of BadUSB, however, the problem is structural,” he said. “The standard itself is what enables the attack and no single vendor is in a position to change that.”

What can a hacker do with BadUSB?

A flash drive with BadUSB loaded onto it, when inserted into a computer, can act has a virtual keyboard. This then permits a hacker to execute malicious commands. BadUSB can also infect controller chips in USB devices which are hooked up to that system.

A USB stick with BadUSB on it can also behave like a network card, and redirect a target’s traffic to malicious websites. Plus, during bootup, a BadUSB-loaded flash or external hard drive can infect a computer’s operating system with a virus before it finishes booting up. These are just a handful of ways that BadUSB can make things miserably for you and your computer.

BadUSB isn’t easily uprooted either, unfortunately.

“Cleanup after an incident is hard: Simply reinstalling the operating system – the standard response to otherwise ineradicable malware – does not address BadUSB infections at their root,” SRLabs says. “The USB thumb drive, from which the operating system is reinstalled, may already be infected, as may the hardwired webcam or other USB components inside the computer.”

Right now, your best defense against BadUSB is to be completely sure that any USB device you plug into your computer comes from a trusted source.

It will be interesting to see what happens now that the code is out there for anyone to download.

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Computing Editor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more