Skip to main content

States reach $553 mln settlement for LCD price fixing

Sharp Aquos LCD TVs
Image used with permission by copyright holder

New York State Attorney General A.G. Schneiderman has announced a multi-state settlement proposal that would see seven major LCD display manufacturers paying $553 million to settle charges they conspired to fix prices of flat-panel displays. The settlement has the companies paying a combined $538 million to settle price fixing charged; in addition, five of the companies will pay another $14 million to settle civil claims and penalties from states involved in the case. Some $501 million of the total will be used to offer partial refunds to consumers in the states participating in the case; $37 million will compensate governments and other public entities for their damages.

“This price-fixing scheme manipulated the playing field for businesses that abide by the rules, and left consumers to pay artificially higher costs for televisions, computers, and other electronics,” said Schneiderman, in a statement. “Protecting the integrity of the marketplace is the only way to ensure the best outcome for New York’s consumers.”

The case covers TFT-LCD panels sold from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2006 and includes charges brought by Arkansas, California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New York, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. In all, consumers in some 24 states and the District of Columbia could be eligible for partial refunds. The settlement must still be approved by a court; if that happens, details of how consumers can claim partial refunds will be worked out and publicized “at a later date.”

The companies involved in the settlement are Chi Mei Innolux, Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Epson Imaging Devices, HannStar, Hitachi Displays, Samsung, and Sharp. Samsung is responsible for the largest payment under the proposed settlement: some $240 million. Sharp comes in next with a $115.5 million payment, followed by Chi Mei Innolux at $110 million.

Three other defendants in the case are not part of the settlement: Toshiba, LG, and, Taiwan’s AU Optronics.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more