A group of American computer science and security experts have performed a hack on an e-voting machine similar to ones which will be used on Election Day in 2012.

Voting machines that could be used by up to a quarter of the US electorate on Election Day next year can be hacked, says a group of computer science and security experts at the Vulnerability Assessment Team at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. In fact, they’re not only saying it. They’ve done it.

A Salon report says that the hack can be performed “with just $10.50 in parts and an 8th grade science education.” Even more alarming, it’s believed that the hack, which could alter voting results, can be carried out without any trace of tampering having occurred.

The leader of the assessment team, Roger Johnston, said they believed such attacks were possible on a number of e-voting machines.

The hack was performed by the team on a Diebold voting machine, though two years ago the same group also managed a similar hack on a Sequoia e-voting machine.

The hack is performed by inserting a cheap electronic device into the e-voting machine. The device allows the machine to be controlled via a remote control unit at a distance of up to half a mile. The device could be put inside machines while they’re in storage prior to an election.

When the voter makes their selection and presses the Vote Now button, the person with the remote control can intercept and change the vote.

A member of the assessment team, John Warner, explained how carrying out the hack costs next to nothing. “The cost of the attack…..was $10.50 in retail quantities. If you want to use the RF [radio frequency] remote control to stop and start the attacks, that’s another $15. So the total cost would be $26.”

Despite the concerns raised by the team, touch-screen Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) machines, or something similar, are scheduled to be used on Election Day in the US next year .

Sean Flaherty, a policy analyst for VerifiedVoting.org, a nonpartisan e-voting watchdog group, said that nearly all voters in states such as Georgia, Maryland, Utah and Nevada, as well as the majority of voters in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Indiana and Texas, will vote using DREs on November 6, 2012. Voters in cities such as Houston, Atlanta, Chicago and Pittsburgh will also use them.

Johnston, the leader of the assessment team, told Salon: “The machines themselves need to be designed better, with the idea that people may be trying to get into them. If you’re just thinking about the fact that someone can try to get in, you can design the seals better, for example.”

He added: “This is a national security issue. It should really be handled by the Department of Homeland Security.”

[Image courtesy of fantazista / Shutterstock]

Showing 11 comments

  1. Moonrider at 10:52am 30th September 2011 It isn't just hackers, those machines can be programmed to alter votes before anyone even casts the first ballot on them. We need to go back to paper ballots filled out by hand, counted by hand, the count openly and closely watched by 2 selected observers from EACH and EVERY political party (not just the two major ones). The totals for each precinct should be posted at the precinct counting area before it is transmitted to the county auditor, who should prominently post the totals from all precincts in the county before passing those totals on to the State auditor. Only in that way will be fairly certain the count is correct and the election fair.
  2. Fe Loreta Gamel Estrella at 4:41am 30th September 2011 republicans better stay alert... Obama might win thru this kind of cheating
  3. Adam Hughes at 12:10pm 29th September 2011 Great article dt
  4. PresidentObama at 1:16am 29th September 2011 As an elections poll assistant manager in Georgia let me say this is just one more reason for paper printouts. Not receipts for people to take with them as that has lead to selling votes in the past.But with a printout a voter can verify visibly their vote. (If they messed up, that's too bad.) Then they put the printout in a sealed box before they leave the polls.If there is ever a question the Diebold machine aggregrated totals could be compared to a manual count of the printouts.We have a medium prescinct. In the last presidential election we had something like 20 electronic voting machines. So the vote fraud folks would have to gain access to 20 machines, just for our prescinct at a cost of $10.50 per machine = $210 + $15 for the transmitter. And that's just one prescinct with about 1500 registered voters. Multiply that by the thousands of machines in all the prescincts in the state and someone would have to come up with a pile of money. Also every prescinct would need a person to remotely perpetrate the fraud. And anyone who has watched TV cop shows knows the more people who are involved in a crime means someone will talk and the crime be discovered.So, sure, if the article is right it *may* be possible to hack the Diebold machines it would cost too much to make a difference and involve too many bad people.Tom Lee Election Poll Assistant Manager DeKalb County Georgia
  5. Stephen LeatherFace Popa at 7:57am 29th September 2011 this is hows it should be http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/david_bismark_e_voting_without_fraud.html
  6. Damon Schmitt at 7:35am 29th September 2011 "You could design the seals better."This implies to me, they don't even do something simple like most consumer electronics, and just put a sticker over 'the part that opens'. You know, the "Warranty Void If Broken" stickers. Pathetic.
  7. Angelina Christopher at 7:19am 29th September 2011 http://www.365socialmedia.co.uk
  8. Bart Tredway at 5:52am 29th September 2011 'Anonymous' needs to do something useful, and see to it that we vote in George Carlin in 2012.Or Boobies. President Boobies. Everyone likes boobies, and they're good for our blood pressure.
  9. Zackery Brown at 5:37am 29th September 2011 The foundation for corrupt elections everywhere. Yet I'm sure we will figure out a way to fix it.
  10. Mose Karanja at 5:35am 29th September 2011 Double click to rig
  11. Stephen Mark Monteith at 5:19am 29th September 2011 Well, I'm glad we did this now.
Close Suggestion Amazon Kindle Touch unveiling and hands-on photos
View Article