Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Measuring the Internet’s emotions about the ‘Breaking Bad’ finale

Add as a preferred source on Google

In a total non-surprise, Breaking Bad completely dominated everything everywhere yesterday. The terminal episode aired last night, bringing the ballad of Walter White and co. to a close. So how did the final show fair on social media? Putting it lightly, Breaking Bad took the rest of TV out back and shot it.

Social analytics team Viralheat went ahead and collected some of the more noteworthy bits of data – perhaps most crucial being the fact that Breaking Bad had 373,337 mentions on Twitter last night. But what the firm was also able to track was how we felt about it all. While clearly how we feel is that television as we know it will never be the same and maybe now is the time to cut the cable cords because what’s even the point anymore!?!?, Viralheat got a little more specific. 

Recommended Videos

#BreakingBad

As mentioned, the show itself received 373,337 mentions; 24.5 percent were positive and 59 percent were negative. This is a bit perplexing given that most everything I’ve personally heard, or seen posted to Twitter, Facebook, or (gasp!) actual review sites is heralding the finale as one of the best show wrap-ups of all time. Of course, given that we are talking about analytics technologies reading emotion, it’s incredibly possible that tweets lamenting the end of the show were interpreted as “negative,” but were no such thing.

“Viralheat thinks that the sentiment has a higher percentage of negative due to the strong (sad, upset, etc.) feelings around Breaking Bad ending,” a rep for the company tells me. For example … 

There was also a lot of blatant love.

Of course there is also this camp: 

#WalterWhite

The man, the myth, the legend himself raked in 133,158 mentions; 31 percent positive, 51 percent negative. Why the high negativity for a character that is – generally, and maybe strangely – beloved? Well, Twitter is an overwhelmingly negative place for starters; you know how you’re more likely to review something you hated to warn people than something you thought was okay, or even liked? Yeah, that applies here too. Also, with such a large number, the sentiment is bound to be more diverse. You get a lot of people talking, you’re going to also get a lot of opinions.

#JessePinkman

Aaron Paul has made us all fall in love with him as well as Jesse, even if we know he’s probably no good for us. That heart of gold shines through and we just can’t help it. Jesse Pinkman recieved 43,706 mentions, with 40 percent positive and 41 percent negative.

#SaulGoodman

Naturally, everybody’s favorite character getting a spinoff (okay, he might be the only character getting a spinoff, but with good reason) accumulated 7,248 mentions – and was the most positively tweeted-about of the bunch. Some 48.5 percent of the tweets were positive, and 36 percent were negative.

#SkylerWhite

Oh poor, long-suffering Skyler. She’s always been so strangely hated by fans and labeled a buzzkill – seriously, what a nag, right? Her husband lied about dealing meth and then completely turned their lives into a dramatic Pablo Escobar-themed telenovela. What a relentless harpy!! So of course, of her 5,951 mentions, only 34 percent were positive and a whopping 58 percent were negative.

Also worth noting is the fact that none other than Samuel L. Jackson is the biggest jerk of all time for tweeting a spoiler sans warning.

WARNING: IF YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE FINAL EPISODE STOP READING HERE. ALSO, IT’S SUPER WEIRD YOU READ UP TO THIS POINT; YOU SHOULD BE SITTING IN A CAVE WITH YOUR HANDS OVER YOUR EARS UNTIL YOU WATCH THE SHOW. Also, get this app. 

Now that that’s out of the way, look at what Mr. Jackson if you’re nasty posted today: 

The reactions are … passionate. Here’s one of the more reserved responses.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Snapchat Planets Meaning: Order, Rankings, and How Friend Solar System Works
Snapchat Planets turns your best friends list into a solar system, and yes, your orbit says a lot
Snapchat Planets being shown on the Snapchat app on iPhone.

Snapchat+ includes several exclusive features, but few have generated as much curiosity as Snapchat Planets. Part of the app's Friend Solar System, it transforms your Best Friends list into a planetary ranking, assigning each of your top eight friends a planet based on how often you interact.

From Mercury, which represents your closest friend, to Neptune, which represents your eighth closest, the system offers a quick visual snapshot of your interactions. But what do the different planets actually mean, and how does Snapchat decide who gets which one?

Read more
Instagram lands on Samsung TVs, with episodic series and live TV coming to your screen soon
Instagram for TV adds new features for group watching.
instagram-samsung-tv

Meta just expanded Instagram for TV to Samsung Smart TVs across the US, rolling out a bunch of new features built for group viewing. With Samsung now on board, Instagram for TV has officially landed on the three biggest connected TV platforms in the country.

https://twitter.com/metanewsroom/status/2069062429821026732?s=46

Read more
TikTok’s AI slop problem is worse than you think — and kids are seeing the most of it
TikTok

TikTok has spent years perfecting the art of knowing exactly what you want to watch next. Open the app, scroll a few times, and suddenly it’s serving videos that feel uncannily tailored to your interests. But what happens before TikTok learns who you are? According to new research from video editing platform Kapwing, the answer is increasingly AI slop.

The study found that nearly 60% of the videos shown to a brand-new TikTok account were low-quality AI-generated content. That’s not a niche problem buried in obscure corners of the platform. It’s the first impression TikTok is making on new users before the algorithm even begins personalizing their feed. And if that sounds concerning, the findings around children’s content are even harder to ignore.

Read more