Skip to main content

Apple's troubles in Japan continue as antitrust watchdog may spring into action

Apple iPhone 7
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends
Japan’s Fair Trade Commission seems to have had enough of alleged antitrust activities involving Apple and its carrier partners in the country, since the agency is considering taking action, reports Reuters.

In August, the FTC released a report that implicated the likes of NTT Docomo, KDDI Corp., and Softbank Group, alleging these top carriers within Japan are inhibiting the ability of smaller competitors to compete by refusing to sell them older surplus iPhones. More specifically, the three aforementioned carriers have deals in place that have them send older, surplus iPhones to other regions.

Furthermore, they reportedly buy iPhones in bulk and sell them at a discount, which gives Apple an advantage over competitors like Samsung. For example, the iPhone 7 and Galaxy S7 Edge can be purchased through NTT Docomo without a contract for 93,960 yen ($932), but the iPhone 7’s price drops to 38,232 yen ($379) if you opt for a two-year contract. By comparison, the Galaxy S7 Edge drops to 54,432 yen ($539).

As such, regulators are also interested in taking a look at Apple’s supply agreements with NTT Docomo, KDDI Corp., and Softbank Group, even though the U.S.-based company was not named in August’s report.

According to unnamed officials, the FTC wants to put enough pressure on these carriers to eliminate any antitrust violation, even if this involves renegotiating their contracts with Apple. “We are getting closer to taking action,” said an unnamed official. All three carriers have denied any wrongdoing on their part.

It’s worth noting that Apple is already under scrutiny in Japan over its tax practices. According to the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau, the company underreported its income in 2014 and 2015 by sending portions of its income to Ireland, where Apple did not pay taxes on the international transaction. As a result, Japan ordered the company to pay $118 million, and Apple has since complied.

Editors' Recommendations

Williams Pelegrin
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
Apple responds to troubling iPhone 14 Pro camera issue
An image of two iPhone 14 Pro Max's laying on top of one another.

Soon after Apple’s new iPhone 14 Pro began landing in customers’ hands on Friday, reports started surfacing of a troubling issue with the handset's camera.

When using the phone's camera within apps such as TikTok, Instagram, and Snapchat, some owners saw the camera mechanism starting to vibrate rapidly and also make a weird buzzing sound, causing an unstable and blurry image to appear on the display.

Read more
Apple’s Ceramic Shield may change your mind about an iPhone 14 screen protector
iPhone 13 Pro side view.

Just how much do you need a screen protector on your new iPhone 14? Screen protectors are like cases — we don’t always want to buy and use them but feel we should protect our investment from harm. But with that comes the expense, the awkwardness of fitting the things, and sometimes a change in the feel of the glass under our finger.

The iPhone 14 Pro uses a special type of protective glass Apple calls Ceramic Shield, which it says offers scratch resistance and four times the drop protection versus iPhone models without the special glass. Is there any point in fitting a screen protector to it, and if you don’t, what will your phone look like after a year? That’s what we’ve found out.
What is Ceramic Shield?
Ceramic Shield glass was introduced on the iPhone 12 series, was used on the iPhone 13 series, and is fitted to the new iPhone 14 models, too. It doesn’t matter whether you buy a regular iPhone 14, the iPhone 14 Pro, or the iPhone 14 Pro Max — it has Apple’s Ceramic Shield glass on the front. Like the familiar Gorilla Glass fitted on many Android devices, Apple’s Ceramic Shield has also been developed by experts at Corning.

Read more
Apple settles class-action lawsuit over iPhone 4S throttling
daily app deals ios 03 17 2016 iphone 4s owners sue apple

Apple has reached a settlement on a class-action lawsuit filed in December 2015 over claims its iOS 9 update throttled the performance of the iPhone 4S. According to MacRumors, the company is willing to pay $15 to each iPhone 4S owner for their poor performance claims.

The lawsuit was filed by Chaim Lerman and 100 other customers from New York and New Jersey who accused Apple of planned obsolescence of the iPhone 4S by knowingly slowing it down following the iOS 9 update. The plaintiffs claimed the company misrepresented the iOS 9 update as being compatible with the iPhone 4S (which came out in 2011) on its website, promising to bring faster performance to the device along with the newer models at the time. Instead, they said the update throttled all the apps, including the Phone app, and rendered their iPhone 4S devices completely useless.

Read more