Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. Legacy Archives

Injunction Puts BlueBeat Out of the Beatles Business

Add as a preferred source on Google
Beatles (MBE presser; photographer unknown)
Image used with permission by copyright holder

U.S. District Judge John F. Walker has issued a preliminary injunction barring online music sites BlueBeat and BaseBeat from streaming or selling any tracks from EMI artists—and that includes the Beatles, along with popular acts like Coldplay.

Record label EMI had filed suit against BlueBeat and its owner Hank Risan for streaming and selling tunes by the Beatles and other EMI artists without the labels’ permission. While the vast majority of recordings from EMI’s artist are available for purchase and streaming via other online music services, the Beatles are perhaps the most famous hold-out from the digital music scene: although the Fab Four are now the stars of their own video game, their music catalog is not legally available for purchase through any online music store. BlueBeat drew EMI’s ire when it began offering Beatles’ recordings for $0.25 a pop—substantially below the going rate for single tracks from most online music services.

Recommended Videos

BlueBeat apparently justified its actions by claiming it was selling “psycho-acoustic simulations” of Beatles tracks, rather than original recordings, using a process that allegedly improved the quality of the recordings and simulated how a live listener might perceive a performance. BlueBeat also claimed that by embedding images in the digital downloads, they became new works to which it controlled copyright.

Most industry watchers have dismissed BlueBeat’s claims as completely implausible.

Judge Walker’s injunction will remain in place until the case goes to trial…if it ever gets to trial.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more