Skip to main content

For Faraday Future, Pikes Peak was both a race and a testing lab

While it is still unclear whether Faraday Future will be able to get its FF 91 electric car into production anytime soon, the company at least proved that the FF 91 is pretty fast. At the recent Pikes Peak International Hill Climb, Faraday Future’s creation set a record for production-based electric cars.

Staged on the Colorado mountain of the same name, the Pikes Peak Hill Climb features a 12.42-mile course with 156 turns that climbs 4,270 feet from the starting line to the finish line. The thin air at Pikes Peak’s high altitude gives electric cars an advantage since, like people, internal-combustion engines do not do very well when deprived of oxygen. Besides the FF 91, recent all-electric entries have included purpose-built race cars, a modified Acura NSX, and a Tesla Model S, among others.

Driven by Faraday engineer Robin Shute, the FF 91 ran in Pikes Peak’s Exhibition Class. It covered the course in 11:25.083, beating the previous record for a production-based electric car by more than 20 seconds, according to Faraday. “Production-based” is key here because the FF 91 isn’t actually on sale yet. Hopefully the eventual production model will feel as fast as the racer looks in the above video, which was posted to the Pikes Peak YouTube channel.

Faraday used a “beta” development vehicle that was largely representative of the eventual production model, albeit with some Pikes Peak-specific hardware and software tweaks. Faraday viewed Pikes Peak as a testing opportunity, with Shute saying that engineers identified “key battery pack relay and system seal issues” that will improve the production process. But the automaker will also get more public exposure from the high-profile race. Pikes Peak is not Faraday’s first motor-sport foray, it also backs a team in Formula E.

“The hill climb at Pikes Peak serves as the ideal setting to further develop the electric propulsion system and supporting thermal systems of FF 91,” Faraday research and development boss Nick Sampson said in a statement ahead of the race. Seeing how components perform under the stresses of racing was a major reason for going to Pikes Peak, Farady engineers explained in a video (see below) produced by the automaker. “Testing the performance of FF 91 in real-world conditions sets the bar even higher as we bring the vehicle to market in 2018,” Sampson said.

Sampson’s confirmation of a 2018 launch date aligns with previous statements from Faraday, but it seems like an optimistic goal. The company has halted work on its North Las Vegas, Nevada, factory indefinitely, and has not announced concrete plans for a new factory. Between building a factory, completing development work on the FF 91, and tooling up for production, Faraday has a lot to finish in a very short amount of time.

Faraday has also had to contend with instability at its main backer, Chinese tech firm LeEco. The company is laying off most of its U.S. workforce, and billionaire founder Jia Yueting said in November that it was running out of cash. Faraday has said it is unaffected by the LeEco cuts, although it is now looking for additional sources of funding.

Updated: Added second video and updated information on Faraday’s Nevada factory.

Editors' Recommendations

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
Tesla’s fix for faulty Cybertruck pedal is simpler than you might think
Tesla Cybertruck

Less than five months after handing over the first Cybertrucks to customers, Tesla has had to recall the electric pickup to fix an issue with the accelerator.

In a notice issued on Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said that the recall impacts Cybertruck vehicles manufactured from November 13, 2023, to April 4, 2024. This suggests that all -- or almost all -- of the 3,878 Cybertrucks being recalled are those that have been manufactured to date.

Read more
Ford Mustang Mach-E 2024 vs. Mach-E 2023: What’s new in Ford’s electric Mustang?
Blue Ford Mustang Mach-E on a rooftop

The Ford Mustang Mach-E is easily one of the best EVs for the price, offering a solid range, sleek design, and pretty good tech on the inside. In recent years, it has gotten even cheaper -- thanks in large part to a price war between it and the Tesla Model 3. And, the company just took the wraps off of the latest and greatest version of the Mach-E, labeled as the 2024 model.

The 2024 Mustang Mach-E is notably different from the 2023 iteration in some meaningful ways. So much so that we decided to take a look at the two head-to-head -- to see if it was better to pay for the 2024 model or save some cash on any remaining 2023 stock.
Design
The Mustang Mach-E looks relatively unique -- in a good way. And thankfully, Ford has largely kept the overall design the same for the 2024 model, at least when it comes to the more consumer-focused models. The car retains the slatted taillights and crossover size. It also offers a large selection of colors, including the very blue Grabber Blue Metallic, as well as Rapid Red Metallic. It's a good selection of colors, and there should be an option for most buyers.

Read more
Tesla to begin production on new, more affordable models
Tesla Model 3

With competition increasing from Chinese and other automakers, Tesla boss Elon Musk revealed on Tuesday that his company is planning to begin production of new, more affordable models in “early 2025, if not late this year.” Notably, that's earlier than the previously stated date of late 2025, though whether Musk actually succeeds in meeting the earlier production time frame is another question entirely.

The news came as Tesla released its latest quarterly figures. Revenue for the electric vehicle maker came in at $21.3 billion, down from the $23.3 billion it reported for the same three-month period a year earlier and also down from the $25.2 billion reported in the previous quarter. Profit reached $1.1 billion, marking a 55% fall compared to the same period a year ago.

Read more