Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

ICANN Approves First Non-Latin Top-Level Domains

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Earlier this year, the International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) approved a plan to enable top-level domains using non-Latin writing systems, for the first time making it possible for speakers of those languages to specify Internet addresses entirely within their own script. Now, four countries and two territories have won preliminary approval for their non-Latin top-level domains, which means the ability to use completely non-Latin Internet addresses could be up and running by mid-year.

So far, Hong Kong, Palestine, Qatar, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Tunisia have completed the fast-track evaluation process. Support for additional top-level domains in Arabic and Cyrillic are expected soon. Although Hong Kong has already been approved in Han (Simplified Traditional), top-level domains in Simplified Chinese and Traditional Chinese are still being worked out: rules need to be put into place so addresses written in either script resolve to the same Web site. Hong Kong lucked out because it’s written the same way in both script systems.

Recommended Videos

Prior to ICANN’s plans to enable non-Latin script systems in top-level domains, the last part of Internet domain names—the .com, .net, and .org part—have been limited to the letters A through Z and the numerals zero through nine. The ability to use non-Latin suffixes means Internet users with little to no knowledge of English will be able to enter and read Internet domain addresses in their native script.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more