Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

Google: IP spoofing on the rise

Add as a preferred source on Google
Google Safe Browsing/IP Spoofing
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google has been running its Safe Browsing service for about four years, with a goal towards providing an open service that Web browsing applications can check against to see if a particular site is suspected of hosting malware or phishing scams. Now, Google has published an analysis (PDF) of more than 160 million Web pages on more than 8 million sites to look for trends in how malware is distributed—and finds that while social engineering tricks play a small role and plug-in and browser exploits are still common, malware distributors are increasingly turning to IP spoofing in hopes of avoiding detection.

Overall, Google finds that malware distributors rely on exploiting a vulnerability in a browser or a plug-in to install malware on users’ systems in what are known as drive-by attacks: typically, all users need to do is load a Web with the malicious code, and their systems are compromised. Google’s Safe Browsing initiative has automated tools that scan sites looking for these attempted exploits, and adds them to its database of questionable and dangerous sites if they’re found.

Recommended Videos

However, malware authors are increasingly turning to IP spoofing to avoid detection. In this case, the technique doesn’t involve using router trickery in order to make traffic from one source look like it comes from another; instead, the malware distributors try to detect connections from Google’s Safe Browsing survey (and services like it) and serve perfectly safe, innocuous Web pages to those services…saving its nasty payload for visitors they believe to be real users.

“The concept behind cloaking is simple: serve benign content to detection systems, but serve malicious content to normal Web page visitors,” wrote Lucas Ballard and Niels Provos in the Google Online Security blog. “Over the years, we have seen more malicious sites engaging in IP cloaking.”

Google emphasizes it is constantly adjusting its scanners with “state-of-the-art malware detection” to compensate for IP cloaking techniques, but notes malware distributors and security services will always be in an arms race…with security folks most often trying to play catch-up.

Google also notes that, with only a couple exceptions, browser and plug-in vulnerabilities used by malware distributors are only used for a comparatively short period of time: as soon as a new vulnerability is discovered—or an old one is patched—malware authors quickly move on to another exploit.

Google also notes that while getting people to install malware using social engineering—tricking people into downloading dangerous software, usually by promising a plug-in or antivirus package—is still common and on the rise, it’s employed by only about two percent of sites that distribute malware.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Researchers develop a new forensic tool that can recover deleted AI chats from your phone’s memory
Pressing delete on your AI chat doesn’t mean it’s actually gone. ORISA can recover deleted conversations from your local AI apps.
recovering-deleted-ai-chats

Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.

How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?

Read more
Apple’s “Pro and Tell” October 28 event: Everything we expect from touchscreen MacBooks to a new iMac
Prepare for a touchscreen MacBook that costs around $3,000.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind. 

The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year). 

Read more
Those cute delivery robots could be the new Flock surveillance menace
Dinner is served, but who asked for a biometric scan?
Food delivery robots

Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?

According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.

Read more