Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Photography
  3. Legacy Archives

Kodak quits the camera business

Add as a preferred source on Google
Kodak Logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Kodak has announced it plans to stop making digital cameras, camcorders, and digital picture frames, phasing out the products by the middle of the year. The move marks the end of an era for Kodak, taking the company out of the photography business it virtually defined during the 20th century. Kodak is currently in bankruptcy protection; it says it plans to seek out partners to license the Kodak brand for other products, and the company will still offer photo printing, desktop inkjet, and online/software services printers directly to consumers.

“For some time, Kodak’s strategy has been to improve margins in the capture device business by narrowing our participation in terms of product portfolio, geographies, and retail outlets,” said Kodak’s chief marketing officer Pradeep Jotwani, in a statement. “Today’s announcement is the logical extension of that process, given our analysis of the industry trends.”

Recommended Videos

Kodak says it will work with retailers to ensure a smooth transition, and the company will honor service and warranty agreements for its existing products.

For Kodak, the decision is all about trying to improve the company’s bottom line and create a sustainable business. Kodak has already sold off major segments of its operations, and (after suing the likes of Apple, RIM, and HTC) is looking to sell some of its substantial patent portfolio to raise cash.

Kodak says getting out of the camera business will save as much as $100 million a year, although it will incur a charge of about $30 million to make the change. The company has not said how many jobs it expects to cut.

Kodak was founded by George Eastman all the way back in 1880, and became world-famous for its Brownie and Instamatic cameras that were among the first products to bring photography to everyday people. However, despite literally inventing the digital camera (Kodak engineer Steve Sasson built the first camera to use a CCD at Kodak back in 1975) and building some of the first consumer digital cameras to come to market (Apple’s early QuickTake cameras were built by Kodak), the company had difficulty competing with Japanese camera makers back in the days of film, and never managed to successfully transition its business to digital imaging.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Fujifilm Instax Mini 13 review: This instant camera won me over with its no-frills retro charm
From printing instant memories to rediscovering the fading charm of polaroids, Fujifilm's camera offers a budget route to a simple indulgence.
Fujifilm Instax mini 13 camera.

See at Amazon

Quick review

Read more
Want to try film photography? Kodak’s new $35 camera is a great place to start
This retro inspired Kodak EC35 camera keeps film photography refreshingly simple.
Kodak-EC35

If you've been curious about film photography but didn't want to spend a fortune, Kodak has a new camera worth checking out. The new Kodak EC35 is a reusable 35mm point-and-shoot camera that costs just $34.99, making it one of the most affordable ways to try shooting on film.

Developed by Reto Project under the Kodak brand, the EC35 keeps things simple with a lightweight design, automatic flash, and a pocket-friendly body. It also arrives as interest in analog photography continues to grow, offering beginners an inexpensive alternative to disposable film cameras.

Read more
The FCC’s latest crackdown could put more than DJI drones at risk in the US
Robot, Person, Face

DJI may have found creative ways to keep some of its products flowing into the US, but those efforts are now drawing increased attention from regulators. According to The Verge, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has started cracking down on several companies it believes could be helping DJI continue selling products in the country. These businesses have been described by industry observers as "DJI front companies" because they market or import products that appear to be closely tied to the Chinese drone maker while operating under different brand names.

DJI's alleged back door may be closing

Read more