Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Evergreens

Samsung vs. LG: Whose TV belongs in your living room?

Add as a preferred source on Google

Who makes the best HDTV: LG or Samsung? Samsung or Sony? Toshiba or Panasonic? We hear these questions all the time. So, if those questions are so common, why are the answers so uncommon? Well, the trouble is that such queries are extremely broad. Answer one way or the other and you can count on getting branded as a fanboy/fangirl.  You can’t just say “brand X is the best.” That’s ridiculous. The best at what? Everything? We don’t think so.

But we recognize that anyone asking these questions clearly needs some kind of nudge in one direction or the other, or maybe just some guidance with their research. With that in mind, we’ve decided to pit one brand against the other in an ongoing vs. series until we’ve exhausted as many variations as possible; because the truth is, different brands do exhibit distinct characteristics and understanding those characteristics can help make a buying decision easier. Here we go.

Recommended Videos

Related: LG TV reviews, Samsung TV reviews, Digital Trends’ TV buying guide.

LG vs. Samsung

It’s no mistake that we’ve started with LG and Samsung. These two South Korean TV manufacturers are extremely competitive. Like, espionage and spying and mud-slinging kind of competitive. And while that might seem a little hard core, it turns out intense competition tends to motivate intense innovation – and that’s a good thing. LG and Samsung may be rivals, but they are both at the top of their game. The rivalry has also resulted in some different approaches to TV design and engineering.

Aesthetic design

You can talk about how picture quality is the main priority all you want, but we both know that the thinner and sexier a TV is, the more you’re going to want it. Unfortunately for you, Samsung and LG are almost tit for tat in this department. Let’s take a couple samples from each brand’s line-up to illustrate:

Samsung’s F8000 and LG’s LA8600 are the top-of-the-line series for both companies. As you can see, both offer extremely tiny bezels and very thin profiles. LG’s stand comes forward in a sort of ‘U’-shape while Samsung’s retreats to the back of the set in a gentle curve. LG’s stand swivels, Samsung’s does not. Otherwise, they’re both striking TV’s.

Stepping down to the Samsung FH6030 and the LG LA6200, we see more of the same. Bezel sizes on each are about the same size, but where the Samsung uses a traditional rectangular stand, LG uses a swooping semi-circular base. The depths are very close, too, with Samsungs just .75-inches deeper than LG’s in this case.  In other comparisons, though, you’ll find the reverse to be true.

Again, LG and Samsung are really close up and down their respective TV lines. Which looks better is a matter of personal preference, not brand superiority.

Picture quality

For LED LCD televisions:

Again, making a blanket statement here would be totally irresponsible, but based on our most recent review experiences, we’d say Samsung TV’s tend to have slightly better black levels, while LG’s sets generally exhibit superior color accuracy out of the box. Screen finishes (matte vs. glossy) tend to vary by model, so we can’t make a call there. We can say, however, that Samsung’s LED edge-lighting control seems to be just a bit ahead of LG’s at this point. From our reviews of the top-of-the-line models listed above, Samsung’s set has less blooming at the edges than LG’s does.

For plasma television:

Based on our conversations with LG, plasma is a technology the company is in the process of slowly phasing out. While LG’s plasmas do perform well, Samsung has spent a lot of time developing a plasma that can compete with the best in the world. Frankly, if the superior picture quality of a plasma TV is what you seek, you should be comparing Samsung and Panasonic televisions.

Smart TV

While LG’s Smart TV interface has shown a lot of improvement recently and stands to make a quantum improvement in the next couple of years, for now we have to lean toward Samsung’s Smart TV interface – again, this is a personal preference. You may disagree and that is just fine.

Samsung Smart UIWe prefer the way Samsung has broken down its Smart UI into five distinct segments, and we prefer the graphical layout for its richer, more colorful appearance. Also, Samsung currently supports Amazon Instant’s VOD app where LG does not, and that’s no small deal for us.

User interface

Not only does the user interface vary from tier to tier within each manufacturer’s line-up, but the term user interface is itself very broad. So, for the sake of this piece, let’s say the user interface has to do with the experience of navigating through a TV’s various menus in order to make changes to the settings. In that regard, the contest is a draw. Both companies have gone through a lot of effort to make the process of getting through all the menus and sub-menus as pain-free a process as possible. Neither has reached perfection, but considering how complex these TVs can get, we’d have to say both brands have done a pretty terrific job. There are some manufacturers with terrible user interfaces, and we’ll be getting to them soon enough.

Remote control

Simply put, LG’s Magic motion remote control is our favorite stock remote right now. While Samsung’s trackpad-style clicker may resonate better with others, we prefer the point-and-click, Wii-style action of LG’s remote. It’s just more fun to use and younger kids tend to take to it quickly.

LG Magic Motion remoteBoth of these remotes come with each manufacturer’s upper mid-tier TV’s on up. As for the standard clickers on the lower-end models, we prefer anything that’s back-lit, otherwise they’re pretty much the same.

Internet connectivity

At this point, both Ethernet and Wi-Fi connections are standard on both LG and Samsung’s Smart TV. This really shouldn’t be a consideration.

Now go look at some TVs, will ya?

We sincerely hope you’ll walk away from reading this with some sense of how LG and Samsung compare with each other. But we think the most valuable takeaway here is that you get out there and go put your hands on a TV and its remote for a while to get the feel of things. In our home theater crash course, we suggest you forget about the sales guys on the floor and just start playing around. That’s what those TV displays are for.

Caleb Denison
Caleb Denison is a sought-after writer, speaker, and television correspondent with unmatched expertise in AV and…
Nothing’s next budget earbuds are coming for boring AirPods clones
Nothing Ear (3a) may bring back some personality to budget earbuds
Nothing Ear (a) deal

Budget wireless earbuds are the most popular kind of wearable tech in the market. But just like smartphones, a lot of these hearables basically look quite similar to one another. Nothing has actively worked on avoiding that trap, and its next affordable earbuds are expected to keep the track going.

The company has just confirmed that Nothing Ear (3a) will launch on July 7 at 11:00 BST, sharing the stage with the upcoming Nothing Phone (4b). The teaser does not reveal the full spec sheet yet, but it does show the earbuds in four colors: White, Black, Yellow, and Pink. Nothing’s audio lineup has always leaned on transparent styling and playful color choices to stand out in a sea of AirPods clones.

Read more
Sony’s WH-1000XM6 headphones just became more tempting for gamers who hate gaming headsets
The new update adds Bluetooth LE Audio's Gaming Audio Profile, giving Sony's premium noise-canceling cans a lower-latency trick for compatible gaming devices.
Sony WH-1000XM6.

Sony's WH-1000XM6 gaming mode is rolling out through firmware version 3.1.5, adding support for Bluetooth LE Audio's Gaming Audio Profile, or GMAP. The same update also includes general performance improvements, so WH-1000XM6 owners have a real reason to open the Sony Sound Connect app.

It's a handy upgrade for headphones built more for commutes or office silence than late-night matches. Bluetooth lag can make games feel faintly wrong, especially when a footstep or button press lands a fraction too late.

Read more
Acer’s 1,000Hz gaming monitor is real, expensive, and stuck waiting on a launch date
The Amazon listing confirms the $699.99 price, while the display remains temporarily out of stock.
Electronics, Screen, Computer Hardware

Acer’s 1,000Hz gaming monitor has moved from announcement to Amazon listing. The XV273U F5 is priced at $699.99, giving competitive players a real number to weigh before one of the fastest displays headed to North America actually ships.

Availability is still the problem. Amazon lists the monitor as temporarily out of stock, and Acer has previously pointed to a Q4 North America launch window instead of a firm release date.

Read more