Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

HP Settles Pretexting Charges for $14.5 Mln

By
Add as a preferred source on Google

Resurgent computer maker Hewlett-Packard has announed it has agreed to pay $14.5 million to settle civil charges that the company used pretexting to obtain telephone records of board members and journalists as part of an investigation to stop leaks to the press.

“We are pleased to settle this matter with the Attorney General and are committed to ensuring that HP regains its standing as a global leader in corporate ethics and responsibility,” said HP CEO Mark Hurd in a statement.

Recommended Videos

Under the settlement, HP admits to no liability or wrongdoing, and the California Attorney General agrees not to pursue civil claims against HP or its current or former employees in regard to this case. Some $13.5 million of HP’s money will go towards creating a Privacy and Piracy Fund to be used by California prosecutors to pursue cases involving copyright infringement and privacy violations. Another $650,000 will pay statutory damages, and another $350,000 will reimburse the Attorney General’s costs.

Former HP board chair Patrician Dunn, counsel, Kevin Hunsaker, and three contractors still face felony criminal charges related to the investigation; they have all pleaded not guilty.

The charges in the civil complaint alleged HP used “false and fraudulent pretenses” to obtain confidential information about HP employees, board members and their family members, as well as journalists and their family members, as part of an internal investigation to find how HP information was leaking to the press. HP’s alleged actions are commonly called “pretexting,” and involve knowingly access computerized telephone records and other account information without permission. The complaints also alleged HP violated California’s identity theft laws by obtaining personally identifiable information about individuals, and using that information for an unlawful purpose.

To date, no federal legislation bans pretexting.

HP also plans a comprehensive review of its investigative practices, and will create a Compliance Council which will oversea ethics and compliance programs.

Geoff Duncan
Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Apple will finally stop making iPhone-to-Windows copy-paste such a chore
Your iPhone may finally copy and paste with a Windows PC like it should
Apple Universal Clipboard feature

Copying something on an iPhone and pasting it onto a Windows PC should be one of the least remarkable features imaginable. While this simple process seems effortless between an iPhone and Mac, Windows users are still left waiting.

Now, Microsoft is formally asking Apple to provide interoperable clipboard access through the company’s European Union interoperability process. The request, submitted on March 25, argues that iOS restrictions prevent third-party platforms from creating an experience comparable to Apple’s Universal Clipboard. Apple has now reached Phase III and committed to developing a solution.

Read more
Chrome wants more extension reviews, but good ratings won’t keep malware out
Google is testing built-in extension review prompts, but good ratings can still hide malware
malicious-google-chrome-extensions-on-web-store

Google is preparing to add extension review links directly inside Chrome, putting feedback closer to the menus people already use to manage their add-ons.

A Chromium change, first spotted by Windows Report, points to review options in the Extensions menu, the chrome://extensions management page, and extension context menus. Only eligible Chrome Web Store extensions in good standing would qualify, and the feature is still under development.

Read more
Passkeys were pushed as a safer future. Hackers have figured out ways to break those synced to Google
Google’s “uncopyable” passkeys may be easier to steal than promised
google-lawsuite-AI-Scams

Passkeys have been pushed as the safer successor to passwords. It promised protection from phishing, credential reuse, and password leaks. Google even claims that it cannot be copied or accidentally handed to someone else. But it might not be as secure as the company wants it to be.

Security researchers (Via BleepingComputer) have now found three ways malware can undermine those promises for passkeys synced through Google Password Manager. The techniques, collectively named Pass-ta-key, target Google Password Manager inside Chrome on Windows computers equipped with a Trusted Platform Module. Every attack requires malware to already be running on the victim’s computer.

Read more