Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

Verizon and Sprint ordered to pay $158 million in fines over cramming charges

Add as a preferred source on Google

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have slammed Sprint and Verizon with a collective $158 million in fines after the conclusion of an investigation over “mobile cramming” allegations. Verizon will be fined $90 million, and Sprint will receive a lesser fine of $68 million.

The investigation hinges on a particularly dastardly method of revenue collection, wherein major carriers add seemingly minor increases to their customers bills for small fines and services. This tactic is referred to as “cramming, and the FCC and FTC have been investigating carriers for a while now. Sprint and Verizon are not the first companies the two agencies have set their sights on. Recently, both T-Mobile and AT&T were fined for cramming charges.

Recommended Videos

The FCC memo states that Sprint and Verizon “billed customers millions of dollars in unauthorized third-party premium text messaging services [PSMS], a practice called ‘cramming.”

“The monthly charge for these third-party premium text messaging services ranged from $0.99 to $14.00, but typically were $9.99 per month,” the memo reads. “Verizon retained 30 percent or more of each third-party charge that it billed, while Sprint received approximately 35 percent of collected revenues for each of its third-party charges.”

The many customers who complained to the FCC stated that they never added the third-party services for which they were charged to their plans, or authorized the charges at all. When the customers contacted their respective carriers for a refund, the carriers refused to reimburse them. When the FCC later sought proof that customers had asked for the services in question, the carriers were “unable to prove that these services were ever requested.” The carriers were thus found guilty of cramming charges.

About $120 million of the total settlements are intended for customer refunds. The carriers agreed to halt the practice in 2013, after being called to the attention of the federal agencies, but the settlements indicate that the companies continued the charges into 2014.

Current and former Verizon customers can submit claims for refunds here, and Sprint customers can do so here. If you have had any un-refunded PSMS charges billed since July 1, 2010, you can submit a claim until December 31, 2015.

Andre Revilla
Andre Revilla is an entrepreneur and writer based in Chicago that has been covering and working in the consumer tech space…
Apple’s Siri AI is free, until you actually start using it
Turns out "unlimited" AI might come with an asterisk and an iCloud+ upgrade prompt.
Siri Ai on iPhone

Apple's latest earnings call had plenty of good news: record iPhone revenue, a record June quarter, and non-stop excitement about Siri AI. But buried inside the analyst Q&A was a detail that caught my attention: Apple all but confirmed that heavy Siri AI users could eventually need a bigger iCloud+ plan to keep using it comfortably.

Will heavy Siri AI users need to pay more?

Read more
Viaim RecDot Review: These AI earbuds sounds great and also take notes for you
These earbuds do the one thing they set out to do, and they do it extremely well.
Viaiam RecDot in-ear

Button Text

Quick Take

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan looks cheap until you remember who owns the device
Apple Upgrade could be perfect for serial upgraders. But most people aren't one
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple has found a great way to make an expensive iPhone more approachable. Apple Upgrade lets customers lease eligible devices through Klarna, with iPhone terms lasting 12 or 24 months. At the end, you can return the device, begin another lease, or pay the remaining amount to own it.

My initial reaction focused heavily on the value customers lose by returning an iPhone they could have sold or traded. While that concern is still valid, the program makes considerably more sense for a select group of people who already replace their iPhones every year. But the question is... how many people actually do that?

Read more