Skip to main content

Apple ordered to pay university $234M after losing iPhone chip patent case

apple store
Image used with permission by copyright holder
Just a few days ago we heard how Apple had lost a patent case against the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), protector of the University of Wisconsin’s intellectual rights and patents.

A Madison, Wisconsin jury had on Tuesday decided that Apple’s A7, A8, and A8X processors, found in recent versions of the iPhone, as well as several iPad models, violate a WARF patent for improving chip efficiency.

According to Reuters, the same jury on Friday ruled that Apple should pay the university $234 million in damages for the infringement. While still a substantial amount, it’s nearly half of the $400 million WARF was claiming, and well down from the $862 million it was originally seeking.

As is usual in such cases, Apple said it plans to appeal the decision.

WARF managing director Carl Gulbrandsen described the jury’s decision as “great news,” adding that it was vital to defend the university’s inventions from unauthorized use by other companies and organizations.

The patent at the center of the case was granted in 1998 and was invented by a number of current and former researchers at the University of Wisconsin.

WARF’s legal team had demanded a royalty payment of $2.74 per device sold, while the iPhone maker, referring to a case in 2008 regarding the same patent where Intel settled for $110 million, said the rate should be just 7 cents per unit.

According to calculations made by the Wisconsin State Journal, the jury ended up choosing a royalty rate of around $1.60 per unit sold.

The court’s decision will boost the confidence of WARF lawyers who’re currently working on a second patent-related case against Apple. Launched last month, it centers on the latest A9 and A9X chips used inside the recently released iPhone 6S and 6S Plus devices, as well as the iPad Pro.

Editors' Recommendations

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
3 reasons why I’ll actually use Anker’s new iPhone power bank
A person holding the Anker MagGo Power Bank.

Power banks are a necessary evil, and even if you don’t consider yourself a “power user” who's likely to drain a phone’s battery in less than a day, there will be times when one comes in handy. And when I am forced to carry one, I want it to be as helpful and versatile as possible.

I’ve been trying Anker’s MagGo Power Bank 10K -- meaning it has a 10,000mAh cell inside it -- and there are three reasons why I'm OK with it taking up valuable space in my bag.
It has a screen on it

Read more
Here’s how Apple could change your iPhone forever
An iPhone 15 Pro Max laying on its back, showing its home screen.

Over the past few months, Apple has released a steady stream of research papers detailing its work with generative AI. So far, Apple has been tight-lipped about what exactly is cooking in its research labs, while rumors circulate that Apple is in talks with Google to license its Gemini AI for iPhones.

But there have been a couple of teasers of what we can expect. In February, an Apple research paper detailed an open-source model called MLLM-Guided Image Editing (MGIE) that is capable of media editing using natural language instructions from users. Now, another research paper on Ferret UI has sent the AI community into a frenzy.

Read more
There’s a big problem with the iPhone’s Photos app
The Apple iPhone 15 Plus's gallery app.

While my primary device these days continues to be my iPhone 15 Pro, I’ve dabbled with plenty of Android phones since I’ve been here at Digital Trends. One of my favorite brands of phone has been the Google Pixel because of its strong suite of photo-editing tools and good camera hardware.

Google first added the Magic Eraser capability with the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, which is a tool I love using. Then, with the Pixel 8 series, Google added the Magic Editor, which uses generative AI to make edits that wouldn’t be possible otherwise. There are also tools like Photo Unblur, which is great for old photographs and enhancing images that were captured with low-quality sensors.

Read more