Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

NASA delays InSight mission, says we won’t be going to Mars again until at least 2018

Add as a preferred source on Google

Updated March 9, 2016 by Lulu Chang: Crushing our dreams of colonizing the Red Planet (at least for the time being), NASA today announced that we’ll have to wait to revisit Mars until at least May of 2018. The impressively named InSight mission (which stands for the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) aims to take a closer look at the “deep interior” of our closest neighbor planet, with hopes of better understanding how celestial bodies (like Earth) evolved. The launch date has been pushed back to May 5, 2018, and a scheduled landing wouldn’t take place until November 26 of that year.

Despite the fact that previous plans had NASA on track for a launch this month, apparently unfixable vacuum leaks in the “prime science instrument” forced the agency to delay its mission.

Recommended Videos

“The science goals of InSight are compelling, and the NASA and CNES plans to overcome the technical challenges are sound,” said John Grunsfeld, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. “The quest to understand the interior of Mars has been a longstanding goal of planetary scientists for decades. We’re excited to be back on the path for a launch, now in 2018.”

Original Post: We may be getting closer to 3D-printing rocket engines that can take us to Mars, but we’re not actually getting any closer to going back to Mars anytime soon. Following the discovery of minuscule leaks in a vacuum sphere that contains the lander’s seismic instrument, NASA has been forced to delay the mission by at least two years. The leak, initially discovered at the beginning of December, have proven surprisingly stubborn, and now, John M. Grunsfeld, the associate administrator for NASA’s science directorate says, “we just have run out of time.”

The seemingly minor problem apparently has rather major implications, as the previously scheduled launch date of March 2016 will no longer be possible. While Science reports that the space agency will have to wait “at least 26 months before it can try to launch again,” it is unclear whether InSight will ever leave Earth. NASA has not offered any details as to future plans, stating simply, “After thorough examination, NASA managers have decided to suspend the March 2016 launch of the Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations Geodesy and Heat Transport (InSight) mission. The decision follows unsuccessful attempts to repair an air leak on a key component of the mission’s science payload.”

Still, CNES, the French space agency, is optimistic about the feasibility of a quick fix. “We’re not giving up resolving NASA Mars Insight lander instrument leak [sic],” CNES president Jean-Yves Le Gall said in an interview with SpaceNews. “We have till 5 January to nail it down.”

But he may be alone in his thought process. The director of the Toulouse Space Centre, Marc Pircher, expressed doubts in a statement of his own, saying, “It’s the first time ever that such a sensitive instrument has been built. We were very close to succeeding, but an anomaly has occurred, which requires further investigation. Our teams will find a solution to fix it, but it won’t be solved in time for a launch in 2016.”

Sorry Mars — don’t expect an earthly visit anytime soon.

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more