Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Australia Post is set to test mail delivery by quadcopters

Add as a preferred source on Google

It’s not the dog the mailman needs to be wary of any longer — rather, it’s the drone. And not because these quadcopters will attack, but because they might be taking over the mailman’s job. The Australia Post, a delivery service Down Under, is beginning a two-week trial that will employ drones for the purpose of parcel delivery. The test run, set to take place in Melbourne, was announced on Friday, and the Australia Post says that it’s using drones from ARI Labs, a domestic drone applications firm.

“We’re exploring the viability of adding this to our multiple methods of delivery,” said Ahmed Fahour, chief executive at Australia Post. “We’re pretty confident that if we can get through this [trial] we’ll be able to offer this experimental service towards the end of this year.”

Recommended Videos

Capable of delivering packages that weigh around 2.5 pounds, the drones won’t be making any lengthy journeys in their maiden voyage. The total flight time for these quadcopters will stand at around 15 to 20 minutes, and will be conducted throughout 50 locations two times a week in “an outer metropolitan location,” according to general manager of Australia Post’s e-commerce platforms, Ben Franzi.

Ultimately, the goal of these initial tests is to determine just how reliable drones may be in terms of delivering people’s mail and packages — key to their success will be the amount of distance these unmanned devices can cover, and what sorts of objects they can safely pick up and drop off. If they prove useful, the Australia Post sees a great opportunity to use these drones in delivering packages to individuals in more rural parts of Australia, especially those whose mailboxes may be further from their front door.

But Australia assures its citizens that it’s not rushing into any sort of drone-centric mail plan. “We take safety very seriously,” Fahour said. “We’ll only bring it into play once we are 100 percent sure that it’s safe and reliable.”

Lulu Chang
Fascinated by the effects of technology on human interaction, Lulu believes that if her parents can use your new app…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more