Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Robocup hopes robots can beat professional soccer players by 2050

Add as a preferred source on Google

The Messis, Ronaldos, and Neymars of the world may have competition from robots in a few years — at least that’s the goal of Robocup, an annual robot soccer competition that kicks off today in Leipzig, Germany. More than 3,500 participants from 40 countries descend upon the pitch, bringing 500 teams of humanoid, wheeled, and Nao robots to compete in four different leagues with one shared mission.

“The ultimate goal of Robocup is to develop humanoid soccer-playing robots that can beat the FIFA world champion team,” General Chair of Robocup 2016, Gerhard Kraetzschmar, tells Digital Trends. “We hope to reach that goal by 2050.”

Recommended Videos

Since the Robocup’s creation in 1996, the robots’ abilities have significantly improved but they’re still hardly cut out for the pee-wee league. The humanoid robots’ movements tend to be clunky and sporadic. They’ll make the occasional impressive kick or save, but they’re nothing compared to what you’d watch in this year’s UEFA Euro tournament. “They are far from being able to execute a shot like Xherdan Shaquiri of the Swiss national team,” Kraetzschmar says. “That was the most beautiful goal so far in this championship.”

The reason for these difficulties boil down to three handicaps: physical agility, stamina, and perception.

Developing physical agility in robots requires inventing “radically new actuation concepts,” according to Kraetzschmar. “Artificial muscles have been a somewhat eclectic research topic for well over 20 years, but most of the concepts developed so far are not ready for use in our robots.”

As far as stamina is concerned, current batteries are heavy and barely keep the robots active for half the match. Where professional teams stretch and review strategies during halftime, the robot squads have battery swaps.

Lastly, programming perception into a robot is a hurdle for the engineers behind the autonomous machines. “Allowing the robots to behave predictably especially while encountering unforeseen situations is critical,” Steve McGill, captain of the UPennalizers (Robocup reigning champions) tells Digital Trends. “When developing robotic systems, it is important to field test a tremendous amount of conditions. In soccer, this means evaluating, for instance, tricky ball positions along the edges of the field or nearby obstacles that could topple the robot.”

Robo
Robocup / Tom Schulze
Robocup 2016 / Tom Schulze

“Just as in real soccer, a good robot soccer team is very good in the fundamentals — seeing the ball and field well, making fast, good decisions, and moving the ball quickly and effectively,” UPennalizer coach Daniel Lee adds. “We’ve had a lot of experience making smarter robots over the years to excel at those skills.”

The UPennalizers have decided to hang up their cleats this year after five consecutive championship wins. Instead, they’ll demonstrate at the Robocup Rescue arena, where robot teams are challenged to respond to and navigate simulated disaster scenarios such as earthquakes and tsunamis. Here the robots will be exposed to the elements outdoors to challenge their sensors and movement. Rather than training machines to defeat humans, the goal of the rescue arena is to develop machines that save us and keep us safe.

Robocup’s 2050 goal may seem far fetched but, as McGill puts it, “You have to dare to dream.”

Kraetzschmar meanwhile gives a more thorough answer. “Like anyone else, I think that this idea is really crazy, and that it could probably not be achieved,” he says. “But I am also a researcher working on solving this challenge and, if I look at the progress made in the past 20 years, I must say that it is absolutely not impossible that we may actually achieve it.

“Yes, some major breakthroughs are still necessary, but if there is a community likely to achieve these breakthroughs, it is the RoboCup community.”

Good luck to all the teams and may the best bots win!

Dyllan Furness
Former Contributor
Dyllan Furness is a freelance writer from Florida. He covers strange science and emerging tech for Digital Trends, focusing…
Yet another study says AI is bad for elections, and the rabbit hole gets worse
AI may be an election bomb waiting for someone to light the fuse
Voters cast their ballots on Election Day

Another election, another study has concluded that asking an AI chatbot for political guidance is a spectacularly bad idea. Research conducted during Hungary’s 2026 parliamentary election found that ChatGPT and Google Gemini offered not just inaccurate but also inconsistent and unreliable voting advice. The chatbots misclassified voter profiles, overlooked relevant parties, recommended parties absent from the ballot, and sometimes produced materially different answers when given the same information repeatedly.

AI keeps failing the voter test

Read more
Samsung’s humanoid robot ambitions are real, but factories come first
Samsung’s new robotics division has humanoids in its sights, although its immediate business is far more practical factory automation
Robot Touch Human Finger

Samsung wants a place in the humanoid race, but its new robotics push begins with machines built for factories rather than homes.

The CEO-led RX robotics division will initially focus on manufacturing robots. Samsung has separately identified humanoids as a priority, although it hasn’t announced a commercial model or explained where one fits into the division’s immediate plans.

Read more
The future of AI may depend on this one behind-the-scenes change
Running Claude on Android.

Whenever a new AI model arrives, it's easy to get caught up in the bells and whistles. We talk about how much smarter it is, how quickly it answers questions, or how realistic its images have become. But here's the thing: none of that matters much if the AI can't reliably work with the apps and services people use every day.

That's why an upcoming update to the Model Context Protocol (MCP) caught my attention. It isn't a new chatbot or a fancy AI model. In fact, most people will never even know it's happening. But it could quietly make the AI ecosystem a lot healthier. If you've never heard of MCP before, don't worry. Think of it as a shared language that lets AI assistants safely talk to apps like Gmail, Slack, calendars, databases, and countless other services. Instead of every company inventing its own way to make those connections, MCP gives everyone a common rulebook.

Read more