Skip to main content

Fisker owners: Join us or kiss your $100K bricked Karma goodbye

Fisker Karma
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Recently, a story began to circulate around the web that a mysterious company calling itself Hybrid Support Solutions (HSS) had been sending unsolicited emails out to Fisker Karma owners asking for nearly $4000.

For that subscription money, HSS claimed, owners would buy into a ‘subscription’ with the HSS team comprising the original Fisker support system. Some owners showed interest in the deal while other balked assuming HSS was a scam.

Recommended Videos

We contacted HSS through its finicky webpage and found that while the HSS subscription might not immediately pass the smell test, it’s well intentioned. To explain, we’ll have to go back a few months.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

When Fisker furloughed its workforce, many of its former employees found work elsewhere. A select few – ten to be exact – held back from the job search realizing that there might still be work to be had supporting the some 2200 Fisker Karmas rolling around the planet.

Hybrid Support Solutions was born.

Composed of former Fisker engineers, parts suppliers, and technicians, HSS aimed to pick up where Fisker abruptly left off.

“As it, stands no one is honoring Fisker warranties,” said John Walden, HSS co-founder. “Without us, no Karma owner is going to get their car fixed.”

For just shy of a $4,000 subscription fee, Karma owners will be able to access the wealth of knowledge within the computers and minds of the men at HSS. “Fisker’s documentation was deplorable. A lot of essential information about the Karma only exists inside our engineers heads,” Walden added.

When owners buy into the HSS subscription program, they receive support across a whole host of realms from online or phone step-by-step diagnosis and repair instructions to hands-on repairs of leaky battery packs (we’ll touch on that in a minute).

Walden and his team aim to create a tablet-based scan-tool app, which they wager will alone cost $2 million to create, the use of which would be included with in the aforementioned subscription fee.

Additionally, while parts won’t be free with the subscription, Walden plans to have aftermarket parts built from original spec and sell them to subscribing owners at dealer cost.

There are former factory Fisker technicians willing to travel around the country to fix one Karma at a time. Without a parts supply, like that of HSS, they can only do so much.

Walden figures owners will easily spend another $25,000 keeping their Karma on the road in parts alone – far more if they try to go it alone, without the help of HSS.

Where will the bulk of that $25,000 ballpark estimate go? Most likely into as-of-yet unknown problems. A good chunk will go into fixing the leaky batteries.

According to Walden, 96 percent of the Karmas on the planet have faulty battery packs. Supplied from A123 systems, the highly specialized lithium-ion battery packs leak prismatic fluid. “When the battery finally gives out, they’ll be driving down the road and their car will go from 50-percent charge to suddenly dead,” Walden explained.

When A123 Systems originally realized it had sold faulty batteries, long before Fisker went belly up, A123 turned to the Federal Government for additional money to implement fixes. It set aside the $55-million it had been loaned by the Fed and only fixed some 100 faulty Karma battery packs.

After several months of stalled repairs by A123, Fisker sued A123 for $47-million in damages and $92-million in lost manufacturing opportunities. A judge threw out the $92-million suit and a company called Core Opportunities bought the $47-million suit from Fisker for $10-million. Core Opportunities then settled with A123 for $15-million.

All the while, 2100 Fisker Karmas hit the market with fatally flawed batteries.

“You can buy a replacement Karma battery pack on the open market right now for $20,000. I guarantee you it’s a bad one, though. We (HSS) plan to fix battery packs for our subscribers for around $8,000,” Walden said.

Ultimately, Hybrid Support Solutions doesn’t appear to be the scam some accused it of being. It might have come at the market in a confusing and seemingly duplicitous manner, but HSS seems to have Fisker Karma buyers’ best interests at heart.

It seems that Fisker Karma owners are stuck between a rock and a hard place. They can either write off their $100,000 plug-in electric luxury sedan and park it – or scrap it. Or they can try to get it fixed, either through HSS or from some other third-party repairman.

Even though HSS has a strong game plan, nothing is set yet in stone as Fisker has not officially gone bankrupt and several parties are interested in buying what’s left of the defunct automaker. There’s also no telling that Wanxiang, the new owner of A123 Systems – now somewhat ironically called “B456 Systems –  will support HSS with new battery parts.

“If Li, the Chinese billionaire who is reportedly looking to buy the remnants of Fisker, gets the company, few of us will go back,” Walden said. “And if Henrik Fisker joins him, no one will go back. Li can have the company if he wants, but he won’t get the brains and the knowledge that made Fisker.”

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Faraday Future could unveil lowest-priced EV yet at CES 2025
Faraday Future FF 91

Given existing tariffs and what’s in store from the Trump administration, you’d be forgiven for thinking the global race toward lower electric vehicle (EV) prices will not reach U.S. shores in 2025.

After all, Chinese manufacturers, who sell the least expensive EVs globally, have shelved plans to enter the U.S. market after 100% tariffs were imposed on China-made EVs in September.

Read more
Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs. Tesla Model Y: Does electric SUV beat the bestselling EV?
Hyundai Ioniq 9 driving

The long-awaited Hyundai Ioniq 9 is finally on the way, after months of waiting for what many hope will be a  true competitor to the Kia EV9. The electric SUV is likely to be one of the go-to options for those who want a larger EV at a lower price than the likes of the Rivian R1S. But, while it's larger than the Tesla Model Y, it's also likely to be a little more expensive.

The two vehicles are a bit different when it comes to things like performance, range, and charging. Is the Hyundai Ioniq 9 worth the extra cash, or should you go for the cheaper, yet smaller car? We put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The overall designs of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Tesla Model Y are pretty different, and that may be enough to sway your buying decision. The Ioniq 9 is a true SUV; it's big and boxy, and while it looks a little sleeker than some SUVs thanks to its curved roofline, it's clearly larger than the Tesla Model Y. At the front of the Ioniq 9 is a long light bar separated into pixel-like blocks that helps give the vehicle a unique design motif. At the rear of the Ioniq 9, you'll also find pixel lights curving around the sides and top of the trunk. The Ioniq 9 measures 199.2 inches long, 78 inches wide, and 70.5 inches high.

Read more
Volvo EX90 vs Tesla Model Y: Is Tesla’s cheaper EV also better?
2025 Volvo EX90 front quarter view.

The Volvo EX90 is finally here. The all-electric Volvo SUV was first unveiled a few years ago, but after some delays, the sleek Scandinavian vehicle is now available for order. As an electric SUV, it will go up against the likes of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Kia EV9. However, it will also have to compete with the most popular electric vehicle out there: the Tesla Model Y.

There are some clear differences between the two vehicles. While the Volvo EX90 is noticeably larger, the Tesla Model Y is significantly cheaper. Should you spend the extra cash for Volvo’s electric SUV, or should you opt for the Tesla?
Design
Perhaps the most obvious difference between the two vehicles lies in their design. The EX90 is more of a traditional SUV, featuring a big, boxy build that’s larger than the arguably crossover-sized Tesla Model Y. Beyond basic dimensions, however, there are plenty of other design differences. For instance, the Volvo EX90 has a more traditional appearance compared to the Model Y, which, despite being on the market for some time, remains relatively unique when compared to vehicles from other manufacturers. That’s not to say the EX90 looks dated — on the contrary, it’s sleek and stylish, showcasing Volvo’s signature design.

Read more