Skip to main content

Will outdated regulations force the U.S. to ban complex in-dash tech systems?

u s looks to ban complex in car infotainment systems bmw idrive
BMW iDrive joystick Image used with permission by copyright holder
Reports are circulating that the Nation Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is considering a ban on complex infotainment controls like BMW’s iDrive.

According to Autocar, NHTSA said, “We seek [public] comment on whether the selection of some controller/multi-task display combinations are, or could become, too complex for some drivers.”

Recommended Videos

Presently, U.S. law requires in-car displays and controls to be side-by-side, which is supposed to make the systems easier and safer to use. The BMW iDrive system skirts that regulation by having a joystick-based system located beneath the screen near the shifter. Lexus and Mercedes use similar setups in some of their cars.

Both Porsche and Mazda have asked regulators for clarification on the rules governing combination multi-function switch/rotary dial systems.

I, for one, think such a ban would hugely hinder the growth of automotive tech, as it would effectively keep automakers from bringing the latest and greatest in-dash tech systems to the U.S.

In the case of iDrive and many other systems, operating the tech using a mouse-like rotary controller using the right hand in a relaxed position atop the center tunnel is actually much more intuitive (it can be done without looking down) for anyone who has ever used a computer. At least it’s a lot more natural than poking at myriad buttons in the middle of the dash while driving.

The innovative Audi Matrix Beam LED headlight system is a another perfect example of old regulations holding back worthy technological advances. The Audi system is safer than conventional headlights but isn’t allowed stateside due to current statutes designed to regulate incandescent headlights and other older technologies. Hopefully, that will change.

Instead of holding back on cutting-edge infotainment tech, we should rather incentivize automakers to include more safety tech alongside their advanced infotainment. How cars work is rapidly changing. We shouldn’t hinder, but rather inspire.

Legislators should be looking at mandating more vehicle autonomy, which will exponentially improve roadway safety. A freeway full of autonomous vehicles will be far safer than cars operated solely by people without the distraction of any complex infotainment. We’ve been there. We don’t need to scale back tech for safety, we need to instead ramp it up.

I love driving but I reckon most Americans would much rather own a car loaded with tech goodies that can drive itself than one that they are in full control over but is bereft of high-tech gadgets.

Legislators: do the right thing. Don’t ban the iDrive. Instead, focus on requiring partial or full vehicle autonomy features. We’ll be far safer that way.

What do you think? Are in-dash tech centers becoming too distracting, or can better driver control systems return focus to the road? Leave a comment.

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Toyota announces site for its first U.S. battery plant
2019 Toyota Corolla hatchback

Toyota is doubling down on its electric vehicle ambitions with the building of a $1.3 billion battery production plant in North Carolina, its first such facility in the U.S.

The Japanese automaker announced the plan on Monday, December 6, revealing that it will build the plant in the Greensboro-Randolph area about 80 miles northeast of Charlotte.

Read more
Faraday Future could unveil lowest-priced EV yet at CES 2025
Faraday Future FF 91

Given existing tariffs and what’s in store from the Trump administration, you’d be forgiven for thinking the global race toward lower electric vehicle (EV) prices will not reach U.S. shores in 2025.

After all, Chinese manufacturers, who sell the least expensive EVs globally, have shelved plans to enter the U.S. market after 100% tariffs were imposed on China-made EVs in September.

Read more
Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs. Tesla Model Y: Does electric SUV beat the bestselling EV?
Hyundai Ioniq 9 driving

The long-awaited Hyundai Ioniq 9 is finally on the way, after months of waiting for what many hope will be a  true competitor to the Kia EV9. The electric SUV is likely to be one of the go-to options for those who want a larger EV at a lower price than the likes of the Rivian R1S. But, while it's larger than the Tesla Model Y, it's also likely to be a little more expensive.

The two vehicles are a bit different when it comes to things like performance, range, and charging. Is the Hyundai Ioniq 9 worth the extra cash, or should you go for the cheaper, yet smaller car? We put the two head-to-head to find out.
Design
The overall designs of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and Tesla Model Y are pretty different, and that may be enough to sway your buying decision. The Ioniq 9 is a true SUV; it's big and boxy, and while it looks a little sleeker than some SUVs thanks to its curved roofline, it's clearly larger than the Tesla Model Y. At the front of the Ioniq 9 is a long light bar separated into pixel-like blocks that helps give the vehicle a unique design motif. At the rear of the Ioniq 9, you'll also find pixel lights curving around the sides and top of the trunk. The Ioniq 9 measures 199.2 inches long, 78 inches wide, and 70.5 inches high.

Read more