Skip to main content

Acer takes a loss in Q4 as execs accept slash in pay

Acer Aspire R7 tablet 1
Image used with permission by copyright holder
These days, times are tough for Acer, the manufacturer of typically budget-friendly PCs and tablets. It turns out that the firm has reported a $251 million loss for the fourth quarter of 2013. As a result of the big dip, multiple Acer executives agreed to a big slash in their paychecks as well — 30 percent to be exact. Part of this downturn in Q4 resulted due to a $43 million write off for raw materials and assorted business costs.

This comes as no surprise to us. While Lenovo and Dell upped their shipment levels in Q4 2013 when compared to Q4 2012, Acer’s shipments fell significantly. In Q4 2012, Acer shipped 7,703,752 units, while shipping only 6,474,738 systems during the fourth quarter of 2013. As a result, growth between the two quarters dipped to -16 percent.

When speaking recently at a press conference in Taiwan, newly-appointed Acer CEO Jason Chen commented on what he thought the company’s biggest mistakes have been as of late with respect to the PC business. Here’s what he had to say.

“We wanted to stimulate demand using new technology and we took the initiative more aggressively than anybody else, to the point where we got hurt,” Chen said. “Hopefully we won’t repeat the same mistake we made before.” Chen also stated that “We need to dig ourselves out of a hole,” according to Bloomberg.

It’ll be interesting to see what moves Chen will make as Acer’s new head cheese to help boost the company’s fortunes as we march deeper into 2014.

What do you think? Do you think Acer can rebound? Why or why not? Sound off in the comments below.

Editors' Recommendations

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more