Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Anthropic aims to fix one of the biggest problems in AI right now

Add as a preferred source on Google
the Anthropic logo
Anthropic

Hot on the heels of the announcement that its Claude 3.5 Sonnet large language model beat out other leading models, including GPT-4o and Llama-400B, AI startup Anthropic announced Monday that it plans to launch a new program to fund the development of independent, third-party benchmark tests against which to evaluate its upcoming models.

Per a blog post, the company is willing to pay third-party developers to create benchmarks that can “effectively measure advanced capabilities in AI models.”

“Our investment in these evaluations is intended to elevate the entire field of AI safety, providing valuable tools that benefit the whole ecosystem,” Anthropic wrote in a Monday blog post. “Developing high-quality, safety-relevant evaluations remains challenging, and the demand is outpacing the supply.”

The company wants submitted benchmarks to help measure the relative “safety level” of an AI based on a number of factors, including how well it resists attempts to coerce responses that might include cybersecurity; chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN); and misalignment, social manipulation, and other national security risks. Anthropic is also looking for benchmarks to help evaluate models’ advanced capabilities and is willing to fund the “development of tens of thousands of new evaluation questions and end-to-end tasks that would challenge even graduate students,” essentially testing a model’s ability to synthesize knowledge from a variety of sources, its ability to refuse cleverly worded malicious user requests, and its ability to respond in multiple languages.

Anthropic is looking for “sufficiently difficult,” high-volume tasks that can involve as many as “thousands” of testers across a diverse set of test formats that help the company inform its “realistic and safety-relevant” threat modeling efforts. Any interested developers are welcome to submit their proposals to the company, which plans to evaluate them on a rolling basis.

Andrew Tarantola
Former Computing Writer
Andrew Tarantola is a journalist with more than a decade reporting on emerging technologies ranging from robotics and machine…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more