Skip to main content

Did Apple just cryptically hint that a touchscreen Mac is coming?

Apple’s software chief Craig Federighi has refused to rule out the possibility of a touchscreen Mac, potentially opening the door to the type of device Apple has long disdained. However, there are reasons to be doubtful it will ever happen.

During an interview with the Wall Street Journal’s Joanna Stern at the outlet’s Tech Live event, Federighi was asked whether Apple would ever release a touchscreen laptop. His reply? The cryptic, “Who’s to say?”

Apple executive Craig Federighi speaks at the company's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in June 2022.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

It’s a much more ambiguous stance than the company usually gives on the topic. Apple executives from Steve Jobs to Phil Schiller have long decried the idea of releasing a laptop with a built-in touchscreen, stating using it can be awkward, uncomfortable, and lead to arm fatigue. They have reiterated that multiple times over the years, including in 2018, 2020, and in 2021.

For example, speaking in 2010, Steve Jobs explained Apple’s thinking: “We’ve done tons of user testing on [a Mac touchscreen], and it turns out it doesn’t work. Touch surfaces don’t want to be vertical … After a short period of time, you start to fatigue, and after an extended period of time, your arm wants to fall off.”

Federighi himself has previously denied the viability of a touchscreen Mac, saying that “Grafting touch on something that fundamentally was designed around a precise pointer really compromises the experience.”

Don’t get too excited

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Those historical statements make Federighi’s response to Stern’s question all the more interesting. Is Apple softening its stance on the idea of bringing a touchscreen to the Mac? Does the company have active plans to introduce such a device? Or was Federighi simply hedging his bets against an uncertain future in a world where technology moves at a lightning pace?

Personally, my bet is on the latter. Apple has such a long history of excluding touchscreens from its Macs that the idea is probably deeply ingrained in the company’s DNA by now. It has resisted the calls to add touchscreen functionality even in recent years as rivals like the HP Spectre x360 13.5 have adopted it, standing firm that it has no place in MacBooks and iMacs.

Even when Apple did add a small element of touchscreen capability to its Macs in the form of the MacBook Pro’s Touch Bar, it’s telling to note that it was a horizontal touch surface, not the vertical kind that Steve Jobs believed caused arm fatigue. And even that experiment didn’t last long before being unceremoniously dropped.

All that’s to say that I wouldn’t get too excited about Federighi’s latest statement. Apple has tested touchscreen Macs in the past, according to Federighi, and maybe one day Apple will work out a way to make touch surfaces work on its computers. But that day is a long way off — if it ever comes.

Editors' Recommendations

Alex Blake
In ancient times, people like Alex would have been shunned for their nerdy ways and strange opinions on cheese. Today, he…
A major era in MacBook history is finally over
A MacBook Pro 13-inch on a table.

We're living in a golden age for MacBooks.

The MacBook Airs are faster, thinner, and more accessible laptops than ever, while the Pro models have the best display, speakers, keyboard, trackpad, and battery life of any competitive laptop. They're on their A game.

Read more
Here’s why people are raising concerns about the M3 Pro MacBook Pro
The 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 Max chip seen from behind.

I published my review of the M3 Max MacBook Pro earlier this week, and suffice it to say, I was pretty impressed. I'm fond of the Space Black color, and the GPU performance in particular blew me away.

But one configuration of the new MacBook Pro went a bit more under the radar -- the M3 Pro model. Apple wasn't keen on sending this exact unit out to reviewers, instead leading with its much stronger foot, the M3 Max. And while the M3 Max and Pro were a bit closer in performance in the M2 generation, this time around, it seems as if there's more of a disparity.

Read more
Here’s more proof that Apple is wrong about MacBook memory
The keyboard and trackpad of the MacBook Pro.

Apple has made some big claims about its unified memory over the past few years. That was made explicit this week when an Apple representative was asked why it has begun to sell an 8GB starting configuration of its new M3 Pro MacBook Pro, a laptop that's already been under scrutiny recently. The interviewee responded by saying that 8GB on a MacBook was equivalent to 16GB on a comparable system. But is that really true? It's been hard to test so far, but a recent video posted by Max Tech suggests that in practice, at least, it's not so simple.

M3 MacBook Pro 8GB vs 16GB RAM - How BAD is base model?

Read more