Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Dell To Stop Free Home Delivery Oct 10

Add as a preferred source on Google

Only a few days after announcing its XPS line of computers with premium support aimed at luxury buyers, computer maker Dell is rolling back service for customers purchasing its low-end and basic systems: beginning October 10, 2005, Dell will no longer offer free deliver of low-end and basic models. Customers instead will have 10 days to pick up their systems at the post office, or can pay extra for home delivery.

Dell’s policy shift is built upon the United States Post Office’s new "Hold for Pickup" program, in which the Post Office holds packages at local post offices until the customer arrives to collect it. The USPS is promoting the service as a lower-cost option for mailers shipping high-value or heavy items who may not want the packages simply left at the customer’s door.

Recommended Videos

Both Dell and the Post Office argue the new service model is more convenient for customers who can’t be home when deliveries are scheduled; now they can pick up their systems at the Post Office at their convenience after work or on Saturdays during normal USPS branch hours.

However, "Hold For Delivery" presents new challenges to customers who can’t make themselves available during post office branch hours, potentially endure long waits to pick up their merchandise, or who aren’t able to move the items because they don’t have appropriate transportation or because they’re physically unable to do so. For these customers, Dell will still offer home delivery of purchases for an additional, as-yet-unspecified charge.

Dell has been successful based on its model of direct sales and service, including final delivery to customers. However, the company is now seeking to cut costs and increase operating margins, in part because it missed revenue forecasts for revenue growth during its most recent fiscal quarter.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more