Skip to main content

Intel beefs up NUC roster by loosing details of Core i7 variant

dont look now but intel unveiled the first ever core i7 nuc mini computer 3
Image used with permission by copyright holder
“Smaller is better” is the direction most PC manufacturers are headed for. But with an abundance of mini-desktops, full-fledged stick PCs, and even computers that look like rodents floating around, it’s getting harder and harder to stand out from the pack.

Good thing standout is Intel’s middle name, as the chip maker extraordinaire manages to steal the spotlight away from HP, Gigabyte or Zotac in pint-sized desktop décor as well.

Their latest NUC (short for Next Unit of Computing) is the family’s first Core i7-powered member, and is “coming in Q2 2015,” according to a teaser that popped out of nowhere on the Santa Clara-based outfit’s website.

You may recall Intel pulled a similarly vague, low-key publicity stunt back in December, when a new generation of NUCs was “unintentionally” disclosed. In the meantime, the fifth-gen Broadwell-packing product roster has been confirmed as including a Core i3 model, and two i5s, one slim-case edition and a larger model with 2.5-inch drive support.

The just-outed Core i7 configuration is itself part of the big, happy, ultra-fast Broadwell family, and rumor has it an i7-5557U processor will be found inside.

Coupled with Iris 6100 graphics, this processor is capable of flying at clock speeds up to 3.4 GHz, so it’s substantially zippier than what you usually find in tiny computers. But it’s not exactly a desktop-grade or gaming-friendly CPU.

It might be enough to make you abandon a multipurpose laptop, as long as you cough up for storage and memory, plus a decent Full HD+ monitor. If the i7 Broadwell NUC is anything like the larger i5 (and it should be), up to 16GB RAM will be supported, alongside solid state storage.

Four USB 3.0 ports are squeezed in most NUCs, as well as mini-HDMI and mini-DP connectors, 802.11ac Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 4.0 capabilities, and 7.1 surround audio. If Intel finds a way to slap the upgraded NUC with a reasonable price it’ll have a stunner on its hands.

Editors' Recommendations

Adrian Diaconescu
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Adrian is a mobile aficionado since the days of the Nokia 3310, and a PC enthusiast since Windows 98. Later, he discovered…
Microsoft’s Surface Laptop Studio 2 might get a massive performance boost
The new Bing preview screen appears on a Surface Laptop Studio.

A mysterious laptop was spotted in an impressive Geekbench 5 benchmark, and many signs point to it being the next-gen Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio 2.

The test gives us the first bits of insight into the laptop's specifications. If everything checks out, we're going to see a huge performance jump in this upcoming generation.

Read more
Intel’s Core i9-13900KS hits 6GHz out of the box, but there’s a catch
Intel Core i9-13900K held between fingertips.

Intel has just launched the Core i9-13900KS, a CPU to end all CPUs -- at least in this generation. This is Intel's most powerful chip right now, fully poised to top the list of the best processors on the market.

This doesn't just mark yet another entry into Intel's impressive CPU arsenal. The Core i9-13900KS stands out as the first consumer processor to hit 6GHz out of the box without extra overclocking. To hit that peak, however, it's going to consume a whole lot of power.

Read more
Head-to-head: Intel Core i7-12700H vs. AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Lenovo Slim 7 Pro X front view showing display and keyboard deck.

Two of the top laptop processors in 2022 are the Intel Core i7-12700H vs AMD Ryzen 6900HS, but with so many other factors impacting laptop performance, it's hard to compare them head to head. So, when Lenovo offered me the opportunity to run the Intel version of its excellent Slim 7 Pro X laptop, which I had previously reviewed in its AMD incarnation, I jumped at the chance to pit two very similar laptops against each other.

I say "very similar" because, unfortunately, they're not identical. Importantly, they both used the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 GPU, which means we're directly comparing the CPUs themselves. The most important difference, beyond the processors, was that the AMD version running the Ryzen 9 6900HS CPU enjoyed 32GB of 6400MHz LPDDR5 RAM. The Intel Core i7-12700H version was loaded with "just" 16GB of slower 5200MHz LPDDR5 RAM. That means that while our benchmark results are likely to be close enough to gauge the performance differences, we can't be truly scientific. And the Ryzen 9 6900HS is a lower-power version of that chip while the Core i7 is full-power.

Read more