Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Business
  4. News

Ashley Madison agrees to $17.5 million fine, will pay $1.6 million for now

Add as a preferred source on Google

There are a number of ways that hackers can impact an individual or an organization. They can steal personal and private information and use it for identity theft and they can run ransomware that holds data hostage unless a ransom is paid. The impact on individuals and businesses can be devastating.

Another impact of attacks and data breaches can be legal and regulatory, namely when an organization is found guilty of negligence in protecting user information. That is exactly what occurred with the Ashley Madison data breach, where the records of 36 million users were leaked — the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has agreed to a $17.5 million settlement with the site’s operators, Ars Technica reports.

Recommended Videos

Ashley Madison is a site aimed at matching individuals who are looking for discrete relationships. The very nature of the site means members do not want their information shared and the August 2015 hack was particularly egregious for those whose identities were revealed. The hackers let loose usernames, full names, passwords, and some other identifying information such as addresses and credit card information.

It wasn’t just the leaked information that caused the FTC to impose the fine. In addition, Ashley Madison was found to have failed to follow up on the terms of a $20 “Full Delete” fee whereby user information was supposed to be purged and was not. In addition, the site operators were dinged for creating fake “female” user accounts to attract new members.

While the total settlement is $17.5 million, the FTC agreed to allow Ashley Madison’s operators to pay only $1.6 million after considering what they could actually afford to hand over. There is an “avalanche clause,” however, that remains in effect and whereby the entire $17.5 million will become due if the operators are found to be able to pay more. They will also be required under the terms of the FTC’s ruling to implement new data security protocols and to submit to third-party auditing to ensure that user data is being protected.

The FTC cannot easily determine how much to fine sites like Ashley Madison because it is difficult to determine monetary damages based on the harm caused by such data breaches. In this case, the FTC also cannot return the $20 fee customers paid to have their data deleted. In the end, the most that members can hope for is that the fine was sufficient to compel the site’s operators to lock things down more tightly.

Mark Coppock
Former Computing Writer
Mark Coppock is a Freelance Writer at Digital Trends covering primarily laptop and other computing technologies. He has…
The 10 best VPN services for 2026, reviewed by experts
Our 2026 picks cover everything from privacy and streaming to speed, free plans, and unlimited device support.
VPN on a phone

In 2026, there is no shortage of choices when it comes to a VPN service. Most of the big names now offer strong encryption, large server networks, streaming support, and apps for nearly every major platform. The differences show up in speed, privacy policies, ease of use, pricing, device limits, and the extra features bundled on top.

We tested and compared leading VPN services to find the best options for different users, whether you want fast streaming, more privacy features, unlimited device support, or a free service that doesn't make too many compromises.

Read more
Safari’s biggest tab-management upgrade in years could finally end your browser clutter with iOS 27.3 
Safari learns to tame tabs and dim bright pages.
Safari logo on MacBook

Here’s a confession: I never close my browser tabs. I just let them pile up until my browser looks like a Tetris game I’ve already lost. Well, it looks like Apple is finally ready to help me clean up.

Apple’s first iOS 27.3 developer betas are here, and they add three new Safari features: Vertical Tabs, Adaptive Dark Mode, and Siri commands. It’s the one I’m most excited about. 

Read more
Google is making schools choose between AI and access to its Search engine
Google is using its Search dominance to armtwist schools into accepting AI
Google Search

Google says it wants to give schools more control over how students use AI. But its proposed solution comes with a rather extraordinary condition: schools that opt to block AI entirely will also lose access to Google Search on student accounts. The conclusion is that schools can say no to Google’s AI, but they may have to give up one of the most fundamental tools students use to learn and research online.

The change, reported by The New York Times, is expected to take place early next year. Google is responding to concerns from parents and educators who want more control over how children interact with AI, the company said. But linking access to Search to acceptance of AI raises an uncomfortable question: is Google really giving schools a choice, or making it harder for them to say no?

Read more