Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Google Voice Lets Users Add Voicemail to Existing Phone Numbers

Add as a preferred source on Google
Google Voice logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Plenty of folks have been intrigued by Google Voice but haven’t been too keen on getting a new phone number—even if that phone number can act as a front end for everything else they want to do. Google seems to have understood that, and has now introduced a “lighter” version of Google Voice that lets users tap into Google Voice’s voicemail system from their existing phone numbers using the magic of call forwarding.

“Google Voice is about giving you more control over your communications,” Google wrote in its company blog. “We hope this new option makes it easier for you to manage your messages and personalize your voicemail experience.”

Recommended Videos

If users sign up for Google Voice using an existing phone number, they can use Google Voice’s voicemail feature instead of a carrier’s voicemail option. Google Voice voicemail offers unlimited message storage, and also provided text transcriptions of voice messages: users can tap into voicemail messages from a Web browser, read them in an email inbox or via text message, and manage their voicemail in many of the same ways people are accustomed to managing email.

The feature bypasses a carrier’s voicemail option by using call-forwarding; although mobile carriers might not be thrilled about Google doing an end-run around their voicemail systems, those forwarded calls are still consuming mobile minutes and racking up carrier charges. However, carriers may find Google Voice users are not using mobile minutes as frequently to check messages, opting instead for text versions of managing voicemail via the Web.

Google Voice is currently in an invitation-only beta, although anyone can request an invitation.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more