Intel and AMD Quad-Core Rhetoric Heats Up

By Geoff Duncan Published July 21, 2006

Processor makers AMD and Intel are already engaging in a war of words over the not-yet-born quad-core processor market, each claiming in their quarterly financial statements that their quad-core products are on track for strong debuts. However, despite a substantial internal restructuring aimed at streamlining the company’s internal processes, Intel is expected to be out the door with its Kentsfield and Clovertown quad-core designs by the end of 2006, with AMD vowing to demonstrate its quad-core solutions in the same timeframe.

For its part, Intel announced disappointing quarterly earnings (down 57 percent from the same period last year) along with an internal shakeup designed to cut costs and streamline the company’s internal development and decision-making processes. The moves involve shuffling around high-level management so simplify the overall corporate structure, ahead of expected layoffs among Intel’s rank-and-file. Intel’s management isn’t giving any numbers, but analysts put overall pending layoff figures around ten percent of the company’s overall workforce, or about 10,000 employees. These cost-cutting moves are probably the only thing keeping investors from further eviscerating Intel’s stock price in the face of gloomy earnings outlooks for future quarters: Intel’s Core 2 Duo (aka Conroe and Merom) processors might tip the overall processor performance battle in Intel’s favor, but Intel’s battle with AMD is forcing the company to price the technology at painfully low levels

Former Contributor

Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…

Computing

Apple will finally stop making iPhone-to-Windows copy-paste such a chore

Your iPhone may finally copy and paste with a Windows PC like it should

Apple Universal Clipboard feature

Copying something on an iPhone and pasting it onto a Windows PC should be one of the least remarkable features imaginable. While this simple process seems effortless between an iPhone and Mac, Windows users are still left waiting.

Now, Microsoft is formally asking Apple to provide interoperable clipboard access through the company’s European Union interoperability process. The request, submitted on March 25, argues that iOS restrictions prevent third-party platforms from creating an experience comparable to Apple’s Universal Clipboard. Apple has now reached Phase III and committed to developing a solution.

Computing

Chrome wants more extension reviews, but good ratings won’t keep malware out

Google is testing built-in extension review prompts, but good ratings can still hide malware

malicious-google-chrome-extensions-on-web-store

Google is preparing to add extension review links directly inside Chrome, putting feedback closer to the menus people already use to manage their add-ons.

A Chromium change, first spotted by Windows Report, points to review options in the Extensions menu, the chrome://extensions management page, and extension context menus. Only eligible Chrome Web Store extensions in good standing would qualify, and the feature is still under development.

Computing

Passkeys were pushed as a safer future. Hackers have figured out ways to break those synced to Google

Google’s “uncopyable” passkeys may be easier to steal than promised

google-lawsuite-AI-Scams

Passkeys have been pushed as the safer successor to passwords. It promised protection from phishing, credential reuse, and password leaks. Google even claims that it cannot be copied or accidentally handed to someone else. But it might not be as secure as the company wants it to be.

Security researchers (Via BleepingComputer) have now found three ways malware can undermine those promises for passkeys synced through Google Password Manager. The techniques, collectively named Pass-ta-key, target Google Password Manager inside Chrome on Windows computers equipped with a Trusted Platform Module. Every attack requires malware to already be running on the victim’s computer.