Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

Intel Core i9 CPUs are about to get hit with a downgrade, report says

Add as a preferred source on Google
Intel's 14900K CPU socketed in a motherboard.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

High-end Intel CPUs are about to lose some significant performance, according to a new report from BenchLife (via VideoCardz). The outlet claims Intel has sent guidance to motherboard partners to implement the Intel Default Settings on Z790 motherboards, following a wave of reports of instability on recent high-end Intel CPUs.

According to the report, these default settings will enforce a PL2 of 188 watts. Intel maintains power limits (PL) for its processors. PL1 is the base power, or the power that the processor can sustain for long periods of time. PL2 is the maximum boost power, which the processor can hit for brief spurts when under a heavy load.

Recommended Videos

The PL2 for the Core i9-14900K — the main CPU impacted by recent instability, it seems — is 253W. If the report is accurate, motherboard vendors will have to lower the default PL2 to 188W, vastly limiting the performance of high-end Intel CPUs. Gigabyte has already released an update enforcing a PL2 of 188W on the Core i9-13900K and Core i9-14900K, which results in upwards of a 20% reduction in performance based on testing conducted by Hardware Unboxed.

So far, Gigabyte is the only motherboard vendor to enforce this power limit. Asus has released a BIOS update that improves stability while keeping th PL2 set at 253W. It can result in up to a 9% performance drop, but it doesn’t impact gaming performance much. Meanwhile, MSI has released a guide for tweaking BIOS settings to improve stability, and both Biostar and ASRock has released beta BIOS updates with a baseline profile.

An Asus TUF Gaming Z790 BTF motherboard with hidden connectors, shown from the front.
Asus

According to the report, Intel wants these BIOS updates released no later than the end of May. Intel has said it will make a public statement this month regarding the instability situation, but it has been careful not to blame motherboard vendors for the issues up to this point. Digital Trends has reached out to Intel for comment on the report, and will update this story when we hear back.

For now, only Gigabyte is enforcing a PL2 of 188W, and it’s unclear if other motherboard vendors will follow suit. Intel’s official specifications for the Core i9-14900K list PL2 as 253W. If the report is accurate, that has some very serious implications for Intel’s advertised specifications.

The report claims this will be the default setting for Z790 motherboards, though users are free to allow higher power limits through the BIOS if they aren’t experiencing instability issues. Up to this point, most Intel CPUs run in the “Extreme” power profile, which configures the settings for PL1 = PL2. In other words, it allows the processor to run at higher power limits for a sustained period of time.

According to Intel’s data sheet for 14th-gen CPUs, the Core i9-14900K can run in a Turbo or Extreme configuration. That runs the CPU at up to a sustained 253W or 320W, respectively. The base specification simply lists PL1 as 125W without any recommendation for PL2.

All major motherboard vendors have addressed the instability in one way or another. Although there clearly needs to be some distinction about what “default” means for both Intel and motherboard vendors, it’s hard to imagine Intel will limit the power of its high-end CPUs so radically. If that does end up being the case, perhaps the instability issues were more severe than previously thought.

Jacob Roach
Former Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
What’s the Right Laptop for a Student on a $1,000 Budget?
The best college laptop isn't the one with the longest spec sheet. It's the one that fits your budget and the way you'll actually use it.
Dell XPS 14 Review: Sticker

This post is brought to you in paid partnership with Dell

Buying a laptop for college isn't a decision made in isolation. Tuition, textbooks, housing, meal plans, transportation, and course materials all compete for the same budget, leaving most families with one question before the semester begins: how much is enough to spend on a laptop without paying for features that may never get used?

Read more
Siri is about to hear everything you say, but Apple’s privacy approach has me cautiously on board
Apple's new Audio Intelligence features want to hear almost everything you say. A privacy document released alongside them explains why I am mostly okay with that.
Apple Watch Audio Intelligence features

Apple used its September 2026 launch event to enter a feature category it has mostly avoided until now: ambient listening. Siri Recap, Live Rewind, Music Recognition with Shazam, and Sound Recognition all landed on the Apple Watch Series 12 and Apple Watch Ultra 4. All four depend on the watch microphone picking up sound around you far more often than any previous Apple product has.

Siri Recap listens for conversations throughout your day and turns them into short AI summaries you can check later. Live Rewind is smaller in scope but arguably more useful day-to-day. It transcribes the last 15 seconds of whatever was just said with a double-press of the crown. This is perfect for catching a name, a book title, or directions you missed the first time. Music Recognition uses Shazam to identify songs playing nearby without you lifting a finger, much like Now Playing on Google's Pixel devices. Sound Recognition is a useful accessibility feature that listens for sirens, doorbells, and alarms to alert users who have a hearing impairment.

Read more
Can You Turn a Mini PC Into a Local AI Agent?
Furniture, Table, Computer

This post is brought to you in paid partnership with MSI

Not every AI task needs the scale of the cloud. An employee searching company documents, a retail kiosk answering product questions, or a digital sign reacting to customer behavior all need fast responses, but they don't necessarily need to send every prompt to a remote data center. Running those workloads locally reduces latency, keeps sensitive information closer to where it's generated, and can lower the ongoing cost of AI deployments. As a result, many organizations are moving toward hybrid AI architectures that handle routine requests on-device while reserving cloud models for tasks that genuinely need more processing power.

Read more