Skip to main content

Intel will leverage its chip-making expertise for quantum research

Intel has detailed plans to forge its own path toward a chip that can facilitate quantum computing. The company will apparently eschew the strategies being implemented by other organizations working in this space in an attempt to adapt the silicon transistors commonly used in traditional computers to the task.

This represents a significant diversion from other groups looking to further the current state of quantum computing. At present, the superconducting qubits process seems to be the frontrunner in terms of popularity, while an implementation based around trapped ions has also demonstrated promising results.

Recommended Videos

Quantum computing diverges from traditional computing because qubits aren’t confined to the “on” and “off” states that restrict a standard bit. Intel’s silicon qubits would be able to represent data via electrons trapped inside modified versions of the transistors used in the company’s commercial chips, according to a report from Technology Review.

Intel hopes that its silicon qubits will be more reliable than the superconducting qubits being utilized elsewhere. Moreover, the fact that the company is applying its silicon qubits to standard chip wafers should help accelerate the research and development process.

Intel’s advantage over its competitors — assuming that its silicon qubits can stand up to the competition — is that the company is already very familiar with the process of manufacturing chips on an industrial scale. “The hope is that if we make the best transistors, then with a few material and design changes we can make the best qubits,” said its director of quantum hardware, Jim Clarke.

We’ll see how Intel’s project progresses compared to the many other groups currently working on quantum computing hardware. At present, the company is pursuing its silicon-based implementation, but it’s keeping its options open — research into superconducting qubits is also being conducted in-house.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
AMD buying Intel? It’s on the table
A tray of Intel Core Ultra CPUs.

We think of AMD and Intel as exactly what they are -- fierce rivals. However, the U.S. government is encouraging Intel to consider a merger with a rival, such as AMD, to counteract the intense financial trouble the company has been in over the past several months, according to a report from Semafor.

Intel just released its earnings for the third quarter of the year, where the company revealed that it had lost $16.6 billion. Year-over-year, Intel's net profit margin has dropped by 6,064.76%. That's not a typo. Intel is bleeding money, and according to the report, the U.S. government sees the chipmaker as too important to go under. At the moment, Semafor reports that talks between the government and Intel are "purely precautionary," but multiple options to recover the brand are on the table.

Read more
The sales numbers for Intel’s new chips are just depressing
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's latest Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 200S processors have been off to a rocky debut, receiving middling reviews from hardware testers, including from our own testing.

But according to recent sales data from Mindfactory, Germany’s leading online PC hardware retailer, not a single Core Ultra 200-series CPU has been sold so far. Meanwhile, AMD continues to dominate with 95% of Mindfactory’s CPU market share.

Read more
AMD vs. Intel: which makes the best CPUs?
Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.

When it comes to desktop and laptop processors, the two biggest names in town are Intel and AMD. Qualcomm is making inroads, but if you want peak performance, Intel and AMD make the best processors for gaming and serious productivity.

Still, it's not all sunshine and rainbows for these industry titans. AMD's most recent Ryzen 9000 CPUs were met with a lukewarm reception, but then Intel's Core Ultra 200-series were even less impressive. It may be up to X3D CPUs and turbo modes to save the day.

Read more