Skip to main content

Intel will leverage its chip-making expertise for quantum research

Intel has detailed plans to forge its own path toward a chip that can facilitate quantum computing. The company will apparently eschew the strategies being implemented by other organizations working in this space in an attempt to adapt the silicon transistors commonly used in traditional computers to the task.

This represents a significant diversion from other groups looking to further the current state of quantum computing. At present, the superconducting qubits process seems to be the frontrunner in terms of popularity, while an implementation based around trapped ions has also demonstrated promising results.

Recommended Videos

Quantum computing diverges from traditional computing because qubits aren’t confined to the “on” and “off” states that restrict a standard bit. Intel’s silicon qubits would be able to represent data via electrons trapped inside modified versions of the transistors used in the company’s commercial chips, according to a report from Technology Review.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

Intel hopes that its silicon qubits will be more reliable than the superconducting qubits being utilized elsewhere. Moreover, the fact that the company is applying its silicon qubits to standard chip wafers should help accelerate the research and development process.

Intel’s advantage over its competitors — assuming that its silicon qubits can stand up to the competition — is that the company is already very familiar with the process of manufacturing chips on an industrial scale. “The hope is that if we make the best transistors, then with a few material and design changes we can make the best qubits,” said its director of quantum hardware, Jim Clarke.

We’ll see how Intel’s project progresses compared to the many other groups currently working on quantum computing hardware. At present, the company is pursuing its silicon-based implementation, but it’s keeping its options open — research into superconducting qubits is also being conducted in-house.

Brad Jones
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
The sales numbers for Intel’s new chips are just depressing
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's latest Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 200S processors have been off to a rocky debut, receiving middling reviews from hardware testers, including from our own testing.

But according to recent sales data from Mindfactory, Germany’s leading online PC hardware retailer, not a single Core Ultra 200-series CPU has been sold so far. Meanwhile, AMD continues to dominate with 95% of Mindfactory’s CPU market share.

Read more
AMD vs. Intel: which makes the best CPUs?
Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.

When it comes to desktop and laptop processors, the two biggest names in town are Intel and AMD. Qualcomm is making inroads, but if you want peak performance, Intel and AMD make the best processors for gaming and serious productivity.

Still, it's not all sunshine and rainbows for these industry titans. AMD's most recent Ryzen 9000 CPUs were met with a lukewarm reception, but then Intel's Core Ultra 200-series were even less impressive. It may be up to X3D CPUs and turbo modes to save the day.

Read more
Intel’s next laptop chips may have a secret weapon
Intel Core Ultra Series 2 Lunar Lake chipset.

An upcoming Intel graphics solution, namely the Intel Arc 140T, has recently been spotted on GFXBench. The most interesting bit is that it offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Xe2-based Arc 140V iGPU that recently made its appearance on Intel’s latest Lunar Lake mobile CPUs.

A post by X (formerly Twitter) user Michael (@miktdt) compares GFXbench scores of the Arc 140T with two Arc 140V SKUs—one with 16GB memory and the other with 8GB. The 8GB Arc 140V reached 6,613 frames with an average of 106.7 framers per second (fps), while the 16GB version achieved 6,839 frames at 110.3 fps. However, the Intel Arc 140T, equipped with 16GB of memory, excelled with 11,056 frames at an average of 178.3 fps, surpassing the 16GB Arc 140V by 62%, despite both GPUs sharing eight Xe cores.

Read more