Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Social Media
  4. Web
  5. News

Twitter for web returns after major outage on Wednesday

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter for web experienced serious service issues around the world for several hours on Wednesday evening, preventing users from viewing tweets and other content. The problem started at around 10 p.m. ET and took nearly three hours for the company to fix.  Twitter’s mobile app appeared to be unaffected.

Twitter Support acknowledged the issue at 10:52 p.m. ET, saying: “Profiles’ tweets may not be loading for some of you on web and we’re currently working on a fix. Thanks for sticking with us!”

Recommended Videos

It followed up with another message at 11:38 p.m. ET that said tweets “should now be visible on profiles, but other parts of Twitter for web may not be loading for you,” adding, “We’re continuing to work on getting things back to normal.”

Finally, about an hour later, it said: “Aaaand we’re back. Twitter for web should be working as expected. Sorry for the interruption!”

While it’s good news for the Twitter community that the service is now working properly again, the San Francisco-based company is yet to reveal what caused the problem.

Aaaand we’re back. Twitter for web should be working as expected. Sorry for the interruption!

— Support (@Support) July 1, 2021

The fault meant that anyone visiting a Twitter account’s webpage received the message, “Something went wrong. Try reloading,” but following the instruction simply produced the same message.

Frustratingly, folks seeking more information from Twitter’s support account via the web were greeted with the same response, with the rest of the page devoid of content. At this stage, users who were able to switch to their Twitter mobile app would probably have done so, as this appeared to be functioning as usual.

As you’d expect, disgruntled users quickly hit other online services to complain about the issue. One said, “Disappearing tweets? Anyone else?” while another suggested that some folks will “migrate to other social media platforms, just like they did before,” adding, “Twitter is like a dumpster, if it goes down, the trash spills all over the place.” Another quipped: “OK, who spilled coffee on Twitter’s server?”

Of course, most popular online services suffer issues from time to time, and this wasn’t the first time for Twitter to experience what appeared to be a major outage. Various technical issues have knocked it offline before, though the company is usually quick to respond to the situation and reassure users that it’s working on a fix.

Digital Trends has reached out to Twitter for information on Wednesday’s problem, and we will update this article when we hear back.

Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more