Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

The end of illegal file sharing? Netflix, YouTube push P2P Web traffic down 66 percent

Add as a preferred source on Google

How’s this for a surprise: That file sharing problem that the movie and music industries have been freaking out about for years? Apparently, it’s significantly less prevalent now in North America than it was just five years ago.

According to a report released by Sandvine, a broadband networking firm, less than 10 percent of total daily North American web traffic stems from P2P file sharing activities. That’s down significantly – by roughly 66 percent. Five years ago, P2P file sharing accounted for over 31 percent of all daily Internet traffic throughout North America. And 11 years ago, P2P file sharing accounted for an even larger share of North American ‘net traffic: 60 percent, to be exact.

Recommended Videos

So what accounts for this consistently downward trend in P2P file sharing? According to Sandvine CEO David Caputo, it’s all about Netflix, YouTube, and other easily accessible streaming media.

“Since 2009 on-demand entertainment has consumed more bandwidth than ‘experience later’ applications like peer-to-peer file sharing and we had projected it would inevitably dip below 10 percent of total traffic by 2015,” wrote Caputo. “It’s happened much faster. This phenomena, combined with the related rise in video applications like Netflix and YouTube, underscores a big reason why Sandvine’s business has grown beyond traffic management to new service creation.”

So YouTube and Netflix apparently play a big role in the decreasing popularity of file sharing. Here are some numbers for you to chew on: Netflix is the top dog in terms of downstream North American Web traffic, accounting for 31.6 percent. YouTube makes up 18.6 percent of downstream traffic in North America. Combined, the two represent more than half (50.2 percent) of all downstream Web traffic on our continent.

The rise of affordable video entertainment alternatives have clearly set file sharing on a downward path, and will likely continue to, assuming Netflix and similar services like Hulu Plus don’t experience substantial rate hikes.

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Computing Editor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
Researchers develop a new forensic tool that can recover deleted AI chats from your phone’s memory
Pressing delete on your AI chat doesn’t mean it’s actually gone. ORISA can recover deleted conversations from your local AI apps.
recovering-deleted-ai-chats

Did you think hitting delete on your AI chatbot conversation actually makes it disappear? Georgia Tech researchers just proved that's not entirely true. They have built a forensic tool called ORISA that can dig deleted conversations from your phone and even rebuild them into a working chatbot session you can keep talking to.

How can ORISA bring deleted AI conversations back?

Read more
Apple’s “Pro and Tell” October 28 event: Everything we expect from touchscreen MacBooks to a new iMac
Prepare for a touchscreen MacBook that costs around $3,000.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Touchscreen laptops have been around for years. You can get them in all sizes and shapes. Just not from Apple. For years, the Cupertino giant has treated the idea of a touchscreen MacBook the way I treat a meeting that could have been an email: with open contempt. However, Wednesday looks like the day the company could finally change its mind. 

The latest Apple invite puts the “Pro and Tell” showcase in Los Angeles at 10 a.m. PT (1 p.m. ET) on October 28, 2026. Instead of a regular live-streamed keynote, it is an invitation-only, hands-on event for a handful of press and creators (similar to what the company did for the MacBook Neo earlier this year). 

Read more
Those cute delivery robots could be the new Flock surveillance menace
Dinner is served, but who asked for a biometric scan?
Food delivery robots

Two residents of Chicago have filed a lawsuit in the US over claims that robots run by Coco Robotics and Serve Robotics captured their facial and hand measurements without consent, bringing renewed attention to the food delivery robots. The cases raise a troubling question: If a robot delivers food to your door, can it also be gathering sensitive information about you?

According to a report by The Associated Press, the proposed class-action lawsuits were filed in Cook County on Oct. 9 and allege violations of Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act. The complaints claim that the robots’ cameras and LiDAR sensors captured information on customers’ faces and hands as they approached the machines to pick up their orders. Both have denied the allegations.

Read more