Skip to main content

Reports of Google acquiring Akamai are “baseless”

Akamai logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Shares of content delivery network Akamai spiked more than 10 percent overnight on a report from Business Insider that Google was on the verge of acquiring the company—but it appears to have been one of those baseless Internet rumors: today Bloomberg reports the story is not true, citing sources that claim the story is baseless.

Why did the report gain so quickly gain traction with investors? Akamai stock has lost roughly half its value in the last year, and just last week rumors were circulating that the Verizon and even IBM were considering making offers for the company.

Akamai is one of the first Internet content delivery networks, or CDNs. CDNs boost the performance of Web sites and services by parking servers and high-capacity connections at key exchange points on Internet networks, then leasing access to that storage and bandwidth to companies that need to deliver material quickly. Examples of services that benefit from CDNs include companies like Netflix’s streaming video service,and large software companies like Microsoft. In Akamai’s case, the company transparently mirrors a site’s content (either in whole or in part) so it can be served quickly from a data center “close” to a particular Internet user, rather than having to traverse potentially dozens of network nodes—any one of which might be underpowered, overwhelmed, or poorly configured. Akamai currently claims almost 100,000 servers on thousands of networks in more than 70 countries; one of Akamai’s early investors was Apple, and Akamai continues to power downloads from iTunes and Apple’s Web site.

Akamai has been the subject of imminent buyout reports since at least 2005—and none of those reports have had much merit.

(Disclaimer: Digital Trends uses Akamai services to boost the performance of its site.)

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
I finally upgraded my Google One storage. Here’s why I might never do it again
Google Drive in Chrome on a MacBook.

As a technology journalist and food photography enthusiast, I can collect thousands of images at a rapid pace.

And if you’ve also spent a considerable amount of time online, there’s a good chance you’re connected to some sort of paid cloud storage. For me, that system is Google One. I got sucked in back when Google storage was free, but around 2019, the paid Google One subscription service was established. At $20 per year for 100GB of storage, it was a no-brainer for someone like myself, who stores a ton of data online. But a few years on, I'm in the exact same situation I was before. I need more storage space.

Read more
Microsoft Copilot vs. Google Duet: battle of the next-gen AI smart assistants
Microsoft's AI Copilot being used in various Microsoft Office apps.

Microsoft Copilot and Google Duet are the two most prominent artificial intelligence assistants put out by the various tech giants since OpenAI debuted its ChatGPT chatbot in 2022. They're set to bring that powerful natural language assistance into the enterprise in ways that can enhance productivity, improve the digital fluency of workers, and leverage existing data in new and exciting ways.

But which one is best? Both offer comparable features at a comparable cost, but they aren't interchangeable and even getting access to either tool requires a bit of luck. Here's how these two awesome AI tools compare.

Read more
This is how Google Docs is challenging Grammarly’s AI
Google presenting new Docs features.

Google announced a full suite of artificial intelligence enhancements for Workspace at its IO event in May. Now, those advanced features are available as Google Duet, and one stands out as a threat to Grammarly's dominance in AI proofreading.

Google Proofread goes much further than the usual spelling and grammar check that's part of Google Docs. It suggests alternate wording to match the context of the document, listing dynamic or formal alternatives.

Read more