Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Apple
  4. Evergreens

Samsung Galaxy Book S vs. MacBook Air

Galaxy Book S vs. MacBook Air: Samsung's newest takes on Apple's stalwart

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Apple’s MacBook Air is the go-to lightweight laptop for legions of people around the world. But now there’s a new challenger in the form of the Samsung Galaxy Book S, which has swaggered onto the stage with a whole host of eye-catching claims.

Can it beat the Air? We haven’t fully tested the laptop yet, but let’s take a first look at how these two machines compare.

Recommended Videos

Design

Macbook Air (2018) Review
Riley Young/Digital Trends

Samsung scores a win with its keyboard — although that’s not difficult given the ongoing fiasco that is Apple’s butterfly keyboard. In our hands-on review, we noted the keys on Samsung’s laptop are nice and clicky, although perhaps a little too loud. But when you consider Apple’s butterfly keyboard is so bad people are suing the company — well, a little noise doesn’t seem so bad, does it?

However, Apple strikes back with its port offering. While both the Galaxy Book S and the Air have two USB-C ports, the Air’s are supercharged with Thunderbolt 3 goodness, making them by far the faster of the two.

We also have to give the points to Apple for the Air’s build quality. It both looks and feels like a truly premium laptop that’s built to last. While the Galaxy Book S certainly looks lovely and sleek, it feels a tad flimsy; we could hear clicking when we held the edges, for example.

We’re reserving judgement on Samsung’s trackpad until we’ve had more time to test it, but it’ll be hard pressed to beat the one you’ll find on the MacBook Air. Apple makes the best trackpads in the biz, and paired with MacOS’s extensive gesture support, it really is the one to beat.

Finally, the display. Samsung’s giving you a 13.3-inch 1,920 x 1,080 TFT display that doubles as a touchscreen. In contrast, the 13.3-inch Air comes with a higher resolution (2,560 x 1,600) and a higher quality IPS panel. It’s not a touchscreen, but its bound to be the sharper and more color-accurate option.

Performance

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

The Galaxy Book S comes with Qualcomm’s eight-core Snapdragon 8cx processor. It looks like a very capable competitor to Intel’s Core i5, but bare in mind Intel’s Ice Lake chips are just around the corner.

We don’t yet know much about the graphics capability of the Snapdragon processor. Qualcomm says the 8cx’s Adreno 680 GPU is the fastest graphics chip it’s ever made, with up to twice the performance of the Snapdragon 850. We’ll report back when we’ve had a chance to fully test the Galaxy Book S.

What we do know is that you’ll get a 256GB SSD and LTE connectivity — perfect if you need to work pretty much anywhere.

Things are much clearer when it comes to the MacBook Air. This comes with an Intel Core i5-8210Y that blitzes through single-core tasks, handily beating rivals like the Dell XPS 13 and HP Envy x2.

In multi-core tests, though, the Air’s dual-core chip can’t keep up. The XPS races ahead here, as does the Huawei MateBook X Pro — both nearly doubled the Air’s score in our Geekbench test.

Apple offers two configurations of the Air, both with a 1.6GHz dual-core 8th-generation Intel Core i5 processor with Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz, 8GB of memory and Intel UHD Graphics 617. The only real difference is that the base model has a 128GB SSD, while the upgraded version has a 256GB SSD.

Portability

Apple MacBook Air 2018
Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

It’s clear Samsung is going all-out for lightness here. The Galaxy Book S weighs a mere 2.1 pounds — noticeably lighter than the 2.75 pounds MacBook Air. It’s achieved this while achieving a remarkably similar footprint to the Air: 30.52 x 20.32cm to the MacBook’s 30.41 x 21.24cm.

Samsung is also pulling out all the stops when it comes to battery life. The company claims an eye-popping 23 hours for the Galaxy Book S — but there’s a catch. Samsung achieved this number by disabling both Wi-Fi and LTE, which make quite a dent in your battery life. So it’s not exactly a real-world test, then. Even so, the battery in Samsung’s portable is likely to be miles ahead of the Air — we’ll have a clearer picture once we’ve been able to test it.

How does the MacBook Air do? Well, we were pretty disappointed by its battery life. Apple rates it for up to 13 hours of iTunes movie playback and up to 12 hours of wireless web browsing. But in our testing, we only managed to get eight hours of web browsing and 10 hours of video playback. That makes it fairly average for a laptop.

Conclusion: Samsung’s laptop has more on offer

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Apple recently dropped the price of the Air, meaning you can pick one up for $1,099. In return you get a laptop that’s both portable and incredibly well-build, with an excellent trackpad and Apple’s solid software.

But is it enough to beat the Galaxy Book S?

We won’t know for sure until we get our hands on it for a full review, but the Galaxy Book S is lighter, has a much better keyboard, and comes in at $100 cheaper, too. Even if its battery life doesn’t match the claimed 23 hours, you can still expect it to clock in far ahead of the Air. It’s also got LTE support and a touchscreen, if that’s your jam.

Of course, we can’t yet say much about the Galaxy’s performance (aside from the promising hints we’ve been getting about the Snapdragon 8cx), but even without that, the Air has some serious competition on its hands.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names
Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.
DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Read more
A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI
This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.
ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more