Skip to main content

VeriSign Buys Certicom Out from Under RIM

In late 2008, BlackBerry maker RIM was all set to take over Canadian security software firm Certicom…but right at the end of the year things suddenly got strange with Certicom claiming RIM’s bid to take over the company was too low. Now, VeriSign has swooped in and inked its own takeover deal for Certicom, in a transaction valued at about $73 million…or, really, about $40 million once Certicom’s cash-on-hand and short-term marketable securities transfer over to VeriSign.

VeriSign’s takeover of Certicom comes after RIM withdrew its takeover offer on Tuesday after an Ontario court granted Certicom’s request for an injunction on the deal. RIM offered CDN $1.50 per share for Certicom (about $1.22 USD); VeriSign is paying CDN $2.10 (about $1.67 USD) per share for the company.

VeriSign’s primary interest in Certicom is Elliptic Curve Cryptography (EEC) technology, a form of public key encryption that uses mathematics that, in theory, enable higher levels of security with shorter key lengths.

“This transaction combines the strengths of both companies in a unique, strategic fit,” said VeriSign executive chairman and interim CEO Jim Bidzos, in a statement. Certicom’s leadership in Elliptic Curve Cryptography technology allows VeriSign to develop adjacent market opportunities closely aligned with our core SSL business. We expect our customers and the market will benefit from the combination of Certicom’s high quality encryption technology and VeriSign’s proven certificate services infrastructure.”

Licensees of Cericiom’s EEC technology include RIM, Motorola, and General Dynamics.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
ICANN, VeriSign Sued Over Control of .com

World Association of Domain Name Developers, a trade group apparently representing a small group of online businesses, has filed suit (PDF) against ICANN and domain registrar VeriSign, challenging the two organizations' October settlement deal over VeriSign's Site Finder service and the ongoing control of the lucrative .com top-level domain. The lawsuit, filed in San Jose on Monday, claims the settlement between ICANN and VeriSign violates federal antitrust laws, by creating a monopoly on the .net and .com top-level domains. The suit alleges the agreement further fixes the price of registering .com and .net domains far above market rates—with guaranteed price increases for VeriSign at 7 percent per year—and contests VeriSign's management of the .com domain until 2012, saying that the terms of the agreement effectively grant VeriSign perpetual control of .com through automatic renewals. The complain reads in part, "The proposed 2005 Registry Agreement contravenes competition, the primary purpose for which ICANN was formed, and affirms and grants in perpetuity VeriSign's monopoly over the .com and .net domain name registration market." The 2005 Registry Agreement between ICANN and VeriSign permits VeriSign to retain control over administering the lucrative .com top-level domain (which contains some 35 million registered domains, from each of which VeriSign earns approximately $6 per pear) in exchange for VeriSign agreeing to a formal 90-day review process for any new services VeriSign plans to introduce regarding domain name resolution. In late 2003, VeriSign arbitrarily changed the way its top-level domains resolved invalid addresses, directing so-called "junk traffic" to a Site Finder service from which VeriSign generated revenue. The change broke a number of services, especially antispam technologies, and engendered a howl of protest from the Internet community. VeriSign reluctantly shut down Site Finder, and suing ICANN for preventing it from developing new business opportunities. ICANN countersued, and the 2005 Registry Agreement was intended to settle the dispute. The World Association of Domain Name Developers is a trade group of online businesses with unspecified membership, associated with, and apparently concerned with online promotion, search engine optimization, affiliate marketing, and pay-per-click programs. Part of the group's stated purpose is "make sponsors and advertisers more money by educating them to the fact that not all traffic is created equal even though they are likely priced the same."

Read more
ICANN and VeriSign to End Site Finder Suits

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Numbers and Names (ICANN) and registration services provider VeriSign have reached a tentative agreement to end their long-standing lawsuits against each other over how VeriSign resolves non-existent domain names for top-level domains it controls, like .com and .net. The agreement must still be approved by ICANN's board after a period of public comment; you can see both ICANN's and VeriSign's announcements of the agreement at their sites. The dispute dates back to late 2003, when VeriSign rolled out a new service called Site Finder which altered the way non-existent domains under VeriSign's purview were resolved. When users typed in or clicked a link pointing to certain sites which didn't exist

Read more
Nvidia defies pushback, defends 8GB of VRAM in recent GPUs
RTX 4060 Ti sitting on a pink background.

Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang is defending the recently-launched RTX 4060 Ti, and in particular, its 8GB of VRAM. The executive spoke about gaming and recent GPU releases in a roundtable interview with reporters at Computex 2023, where he faced questions about the limited VRAM on Nvidia's most recent GPU.

PCWorld shared a quote in which Huang defended the 8GB of VRAM and told gamers to focus more on how that VRAM is managed: "Remember the frame buffer is not the memory of the computer -- it is a cache. And how you manage the cache is a big deal. It is like any other cache. And yes, the bigger the cache is, the better. However, you’re trading off against so many things."

Read more