Skip to main content

Why Apple’s transition to ARM-based MacBooks won’t be a colossal failure

Promotional logo for WWDC 2023.
This story is part of our complete Apple WWDC coverage
 

Apple is planning to ditch Intel processors and switch its Macs to ARM chips. It’s one of the worst-kept secrets in tech right now, and according to the latest reports, the transition will be announced at Apple’s Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) later this month. With the change now looking imminent, people have been questioning whether Apple has what it takes to make the switch a success.

Recommended Videos

After all, the road to ARM-based PCs has been wrought with problems. Microsoft has attempted it a multitude of times, only to fail in key areas like performance and software compatibility. We have every right to be skeptical about Apple’s own attempts, but when you consider the evidence, Apple is as well-equipped as any company to nail this transition.

Not Apple’s first rodeo

Image used with permission by copyright holder

A transition to ARM means a radical change in Mac system architecture. New architecture means new software, which has been Microsoft’s Achilles’ heel in its attempts to transition to ARM. If Apple isn’t careful, its new MacBooks could suffer the same fate as the Surface Pro X. That flagship device couldn’t run many of the apps people expect to use on a Windows laptop due to the change in system architecture.

Fortunately, Apple already has experience tackling this problem. Early on, Apple ditched Motorola processors in favor of PowerPC. More recently, Apple even phased out 32-bit apps on its MacOS platform, which often required developers to rewrite apps for 64-bit compatibility.

The transition from PowerPC processors to Intel, though, is the most relevant example. Apple provided developers with a piece of software called Rosetta. This “dynamic binary translator” worked in the background to seamlessly translate PowerPC apps to software that could run on Intel’s x86 architecture.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Apple is employing a similar methodology in its transition to ARM. The company has already been working toward solving this for years with an app-translation tool called Mac Catalyst ready to go. Currently, this tool is used to port iPad apps across to the Mac. The iPad already runs on an ARM-based architecture, meaning Apple already has access to an impressive ecosystem of apps that can run on on its ARM-based MacBooks.

That is, assuming Catalyst is widely adopted by developers.

While Mac Catalyst has had some early problems, most developers I’ve spoken to have been happy with Apple’s efforts in this area. Many noted how Mac Catalyst made porting an app across to a different architecture fairly simple — far easier than developing a new Mac app from scratch. It is still an ongoing project, though, and I expect to hear more Mac Catalyst news at WWDC alongside Apple’s big ARM announcement.

Example A: The iPad

Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The iPad itself is another example of just how well-positioned Apple is to handle the transition. Reports indicate that the processors used in these new ARM-based MacBooks will be based on Apple’s A-series chips that are used in its mobile devices like the iPhone and iPad Pro. We don’t know exactly what chips will be used, but Apple is rumored to be switching  to its first 5nm processors across many devices later this year. Regardless, Apple’s A-series processors are absolutely fantastic.

Let’s look at the raw numbers. When we tested the iPhone 11 Pro, it scored 455,778 in the AnTuTu benchmarking app, the highest score we have ever recorded for a smartphone. The 2020 iPad Pro? That scored 717,717 — more than double what Samsung’s best effort, the Galaxy Tab S6, managed to achieve. In other words, Apple knows exactly how to create incredibly powerful processors, scaled across different devices with a wide range of performance requirements.

Granted, it’s one thing to make a successful mobile processor and quite another to make one that performs well in desktop machines. Microsoft’s attempts at replicating the performance of Intel laptops haven’t provided the most convincing results so far, even with Qualcomm as a committed partner.

So no, we don’t have any real sense as to how well Apple’s ARM chips will run in MacBooks. But at the very least, Apple has a head start over its rivals.

World’s first? Nope

Apple's WWDC 2020 promotional imagery
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Being first has never been in Apple’s ethos. Many companies rush to market with new products just so they can claim the title of “world’s first,” regardless of how well these products actually perform. We see it with advanced new form factors like the Samsung Galaxy Fold, as well as new technologies like 5G. Apple wasn’t the first to make a smartphone, tablet, or smartwatch, but it’s made the most successful device in each of those categories.

The company seems happy to wait on the sidelines until it can nail the product and make what it feels is the world’s best version. Remember AirPower? Apple scrapped it because it did not meet expectations. It probably could have launched a mediocre charger, but that is not Apple’s style. We can argue about whether Apple always achieves its lofty goals, but rushing products to be first has never been its guiding principle.

When Apple launches its ARM-based MacBooks, they won’t be the first laptops to have given it a shot. But as far as I can tell, these MacBooks just might be the first to pull it off successfully.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
I went hands-on with Apple’s M4 MacBook Air and the app performance blew me away
M4 MacBook Air

Apple is marching in with new products for the spring, including a new MacBook Air featuring the M4 chip, a new iPad Air, uniquely featuring the M3 chip, and a new Mac Studio desktop, with M4 Max and M3 Ultra chip options. While enthusiasts await the launch of the coveted M5 chip series devices, including the MacBook Pro and iPad Pro later this year– the tech brand has brought in the expected refresh of its early-year devices. Notably, the MacBook Air and iPad Air see yearly upgrades, while the Mac Studio is getting its first revamp since 2023.

While largely maintaining their external designs, most changes to the devices can be found by way of hardware and AI support upgrades. Apple is looking to showcase Apple Intelligence app integration as functional and accessible to users. The brand is competing on the market with many on-device AI experiences, such as Microsoft’s Copilot+ PCs and Chromebooks inundated with Google Gemini. 

Read more
My Mac Pro hopes have been dashed, and Apple can’t save it this year
A person uses an Apple Mac Pro alongside three monitors and an editing console in a darkened room.

Last week, Apple revealed a new Mac Studio equipped with M4 Max and M3 Ultra chips. No, that’s not a typo -- the company really did launch a new Mac with chips from two different generations, where the less powerful chip is from the newer iteration. As I’ve written before, it’s a confusing, ridiculous situation, and one that must be driving Apple’s marketing division mad.

But at first, it seemed like there was a glimmer of reasoning behind the decision: Apple could save the rumored M4 Ultra chip for the Mac Pro and bring back some proper differentiation to the Mac lineup. Instead of having the Mac Studio and the Mac Pro offer the same maximum performance (as we have now), the Mac Pro would finally get a sizeable boost to tempt power-hungry pro users.

Read more
10 years ago today, Apple launched a revolutionary MacBook that failed spectacularly
An Apple 12-inch MacBook on a desk.

Ten years ago today, Apple unveiled the 12-inch MacBook to the world, claiming it had “reinvented the notebook” for the better. The laptop almost instantly divided opinion, with fans and detractors at each other’s throats from the start. And sure, it was by no means perfect, but look a little closer and I think you’ll find a device that has had a monumental impact on the world of computing -- not just on Apple, but on the industry as a whole.

The 12-inch MacBook is often seen as a flop and as a product emblematic of the excesses of Apple’s Jony Ive era, where the design guru’s penchant for thinness and lightness ruled all. The fact that this MacBook was discontinued after just four years is seen as proof of this idea.

Read more