Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Business
  4. News

If you’re not ready to ‘invent the internet,’ don’t look for a job at DARPA

Add as a preferred source on Google

If you’re thinking it could be a big notch on your career belt to work at DARPA, the U.S. military’s advanced technology and innovation group, you’re right, if you can score a position. But don’t think that if you do get a job there, you can settle in for a lengthy, secure career, because that is not going to happen, according to CNN Money.

DARPA is short for Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. All employees have an “expiration date” on their ID badges. With 220 employees in six offices, the agency has a 25-percent annual turnover. Most people stay no longer than four or five years.

Recommended Videos

DARPA has had roles in developing some significant technologies, including the computer mouse, early versions of GPS and of Apple’s Siri, parts of the Hubble Space Telescope, and high altitude in-flight refueling. So DARPA takes on big projects. And it expects results. The rapid job turnover policy means a steady influx of people who are up on current technologies.

DARPA was formed after the Soviet Union beat the United States to the Moon in 1958. It’s therefore appropriate that the agency was engaging in “moon shots” before Google started using the term to stand for tough projects that could take 10 years or more. But DARPA doesn’t want to wait for 10 years for you to perfect your assignment, you won’t be around that long.

The assignments are all big, and normally deemed impossible. And that’s why the agency doesn’t keep employees for a long time — if they stick around and have an institutional history of failure, they’re more likely to dismiss new ideas as impossible. And there are failures. Failure is an option because DARPA is about innovation, which isn’t just moving the rock down the road a few feet.

DARPA program manager Phillip Alvelda said, “If half the people don’t respond to a publicly announced challenge saying it’s impossible, we haven’t set the bar high enough.”

“No idea is too crazy. The reaction is never, ‘That’s impossible.’ We say, ‘How would you do that? How would you get there? Write down the steps,'” said DARPA’s deputy director of the biological technologies office Barry Pallota.

To work at DARPA you have to want to create something big and it has to work. DARPA program manager Matt Hepburn summed it up: “If you don’t invent the internet, you get a B.”

So if you still quiver in anticipation of the chance to work at DARPA, go for it. Just get ready for your own personal “best-used-by” date.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
The Apple Car may be dead, but it became the foundation of Apple Intelligence
A decade of work on a canceled car project reportedly laid the groundwork for Apple Intelligence.
Apple Intelligence in Apple Car

The Apple Car may have never left the garage, but it apparently gave birth to Apple's AI ambitions. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple's canceled autonomous vehicle project, one that consumed more than a decade of work and over $10 billion before being scrapped in 2024, ended up laying the technological foundation for Apple Intelligence. In a rather ironic twist, one of Apple's most expensive failures may also become one of its most important long-term investments.

The Apple Car forced Apple to think like an AI company

Read more
Researchers hid a prompt injection inside a PNG, and AI fell for it
Hacker

AI coding assistants like Claude are becoming every developer's favorite coworker. They can review code, explain confusing functions, and even write entire features with a single prompt. But new research suggests that this growing trust could also become their biggest weakness.

A team of security researchers (professor Sudipta Chattopadhyay and researcher Murali Ediga) has demonstrated an unusual attack that doesn't target the AI model directly. Instead, it targets what the AI doesn't pay enough attention to during code reviews. Rather than hiding malicious instructions in lines of code, the researchers tucked them inside an image file. Since many AI review tools treat images as decorative assets rather than as something worth inspecting, the pull request can appear perfectly harmless and sail through the review.

Read more
AI has already fallen into the wrong hands and they’re using it to make bombs
Logo, Text

Artificial intelligence has quickly become the go-to tool for everything from writing emails and summarizing meetings to helping students study or developers debug code. But the same technology that saves people time can also be misused, and a new report suggests that terrorist organizations are finding ways to do exactly that.

According to a research paper shared with The New York Times ahead of its publication, researchers found evidence that members of Boko Haram have been using popular AI chatbots to support both day-to-day activities and combat-related tasks. Interviews with 27 former members conducted in Nigeria over the past two years suggest that tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, Meta AI, and DeepSeek were used to gather technical information, troubleshoot weapons, and even assist with planning attacks.

Read more