Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

FBI’s facial recognition database holds records on 1/3 of all Americans

Drew Prindle
By
FBI facial recognition
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the FBI has just released new documents that show the Bureau is making steady progress on its facial recognition database.

The lawsuit called on the FBI to release information pertaining to Next Generation Identification (NGI) — a massive biometric database that the FBI has been amassing for quite some time, and that may hold records on up to a third of the U.S. population.

Recommended Videos

NGI is essentially a sophisticated new identification database built upon the FBI’s existing fingerprint database, which already contains more than 100 million individual records. In addition to fingerprint data, the system has been built up to include other forms of biometric data, including palm prints, iris scans, and facial recognition info. The NGI system takes all this biometric information and links it to personal details like name, address, driver’s license number, age, race, etc.

Related

The new NGI system will reportedly lump criminal and non-criminal facial information together into a single database.

The records that the EFF received indicate the facial recognition component of NGI has been rapidly expanding over the past few years, and may hold as many as 52 million face images by 2015. In 2012, the NGI contained about 13.6 million different images, representing about seven or eight million individuals. By 2013, that number was up to about 16 million. Due to the fact that the system will be capable of processing 55,000 direct photo enrollments on a daily basis, the database is poised to expand at a drastically accelerated rate.

Aside from its rapid growth, what’s most troubling about the facial recognition database is the fact that the Bureau doesn’t reveal where all of the images are coming from. According to the released documents, the NGI may include over a million face images from “New Repositories” and the “Special Population Cognizant” categories — two places the FBI doesn’t explain anywhere in the documents.  This is a problem because, without this information, we don’t know what rules govern these categories, where the data comes from, how the images are gathered, who has access to them, or whose privacy is impacted.

Even more troubling is the fact the new NGI system will reportedly lump criminal and non-criminal facial information together into a single database, and change the way that records are searched. Previously, criminal and non-criminal databases were searched separately, but NGI gets rid of any separation, giving every record –criminal or non– a Universal Control Number, and running every search against all records in the FBI’s database.

Check out the EFF’s full report for further details.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Drew Prindle
Drew Prindle
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Drew Prindle is an award-winning writer, editor, and storyteller who currently serves as Senior Features Editor for Digital…
First, it was San Francisco. Now, the U.K. is fighting facial recognition
facial recognition gyfcat race fbi face mugshot 970x644g

It’s been a bad few weeks for facial-recognition technology. San Francisco became the first city in the U.S. to effectively ban the use of the controversial biometrics technology by groups like the police, and now the first legal battle over police use of the technology is taking place in the U.K.

The case involves a citizen named Ed Bridges, who is taking action against South Wales Police, alleging that live facial-recognition technology was used against him in a breach of his personal privacy. His case, a three-day hearing being heard at the Cardiff Civil Justice and Family Center, also claims that facial-recognition use by the police is in breach of data protection and equality laws in the United Kingdom. The complaint notes that certain studies have shown facial recognition as disproportionately likely to misidentify women and people of color, resulting in potentially discriminatory action being taken against them.

Read more
San Francisco won the battle, but the war on facial-recognition has just begun
could ai based surveillance predict crime before it happens us technology artificial intelligence

San Francisco has become the first city in America to ban facial recognition. Well, kind of.

In fact, the ban -- voted on this week by the city’s Board of Supervisors -- bars only the use of facial recognition by city agencies, such as the police department. It doesn’t affect the use of facial recognition technology in locations like airports or ports, for example, or from private applications orchestrated by private companies. Oh yes, and because the San Francisco police department doesn’t currently use facial recognition technology, this ruling bans something that wasn’t actually being used. While the department tested the technology on booking photos between 2013 and 2017, it has not implemented this use-case on a permanent basis.

Read more
How facial recognition is changing life as we know it – for better or worse
Facial recognition software showing faces and the amount of times they've appeared.

Ask any celebrity what the biggest downside is of being famous and you will likely hear some variation regarding how difficult it is not to be able to go anywhere without being recognized. For better or worse (and there are plenty of instances in which both effects exist), having a famous face means continually attracting the attention of those around you.

To some extent, all of us are celebrities in 2019. We’re not all rich and famous, with personal stylists and screaming fans, but we are known in a way that would have been impossible in past decades. Social media encourages us to curate our lives, turning even something as humdrum as eating a meal into an envy-inspiring narrative to be “liked” by our “followers.” Almost all of us are discoverable using Google, nearly always accompanied by photos. And, just as it’s difficult for Robert Downey Jr. or Taylor Swift to walk down the street without being swarmed, increasingly our own faces will mean that we are identified tens, hundreds, or maybe even thousands of times each day.

Read more