Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

Bloomberg thinks other Democrats want to break up big tech ‘just to be nasty’

Add as a preferred source on Google

Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg thinks Big Tech companies have too much power, but doesn’t believe that breaking them up is the answer. 

In an interview published by the San Francisco Bay Area’s Mercury News on Friday, the former mayor of New York City said that he disagrees with other candidates like Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders on how to handle Big Tech. 

Recommended Videos

“Breaking things up just to be nasty is not an answer,” Bloomberg said. “You’ve got to have a good reason and how it would work, and I don’t hear that from anybody, the senator or anybody else.”

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Bloomberg himself owns a massive tech and media conglomerate, Bloomberg L.P., and owes his billions to the Bloomberg Terminal, a computer system that provides financial data to stock traders and other financial professionals.

While he did say some tech companies have too much power, he added that he would want to look more closely at how antitrust regulations could apply to those companies.

“It’s probably true that we shouldn’t have let Facebook buy the last big acquisition they made,” he said.

Bloomberg gave more insight into his tech policy during a supporter rally in Monterey, California. The Mercury News reports that he said he wants to see tech companies have similar legal requirements and policies as media outlets. 

“The rules that apply to your publication, in terms of what your responsibilities are for whatever you distribute to the public, should also apply to [tech companies],” he said. “And when they say, ‘Well, our system is such that we have a million-billion things coming through it, we can’t do it,’ well, change your business model.”

Bloomberg’s views on Big Tech differ from some of the Democratic front-runners. 

Warren has been vocal about her stance on Big Tech and made a call to break the companies up a part of her presidential campaign. Warren’s proposal would explicitly break up bigger companies, including forcing Amazon to give up control of Whole Foods and splitting Instagram and WhatsApp from Facebook. Sanders has similar ideas, saying he would appoint an attorney general who could both investigate and break up the biggest tech companies. 

Pete Buttigieg, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, said last week that there’s a strong case for breaking up Facebook, and added that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has too much power. 

Some Democratic presidential candidates, including Sanders and entrepreneur Andrew Yang, are calling for more regulation of Big Tech.

Digital Trends reached out to Bloomberg’s campaign to find out specifics about how he would regulate Big Tech if he was elected President. We will update this story once we hear back. 

Allison Matyus
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Allison Matyus is a general news reporter at Digital Trends. She covers any and all tech news, including issues around social…
Anthropic’s sensitive internal data was exposed, and AI helped make it happen
Even the company behind Claude isn't immune to AI-powered security threats, as researchers discovered some worrying vulnerabilities.
Claude Anthropic Featured

AI companies spend enormous amounts of time convincing us their technology is safe and secure. But what happens when those same companies become targets of increasingly sophisticated AI-powered attacks? Anthropic, the company behind Claude, is now facing that question. According to a Washington Post report, cybersecurity startup Cathedral discovered vulnerabilities that let its researchers access sensitive information in Anthropic's internal systems.

The researchers used AI agents to identify potential entry points in less than 12 hours. Interestingly, they didn't need to crack Claude itself. Instead, they exploited weaknesses in third-party business applications that Anthropic uses for everyday operations. Anthropic's security testing program disclosed the findings, which allows outside researchers to identify and report vulnerabilities.

Read more
A new startup wants to fix the military’s working-dog shortage with cloning and gene editing
Promising pitch, plenty of unanswered questions about the dogs.
a new startup wants to fix the militarys working dog shortage with cloning and gene editing warhound featured image

Military working dogs charge into places the rest of us would flee. So, I understand why anyone would want to breed tougher, healthier dogs for the job.

Warhound, a new startup from Colossal Biosciences co-founder Ben Lamm and Anduril co-founder Palmer Luckey, has stepped out of stealth with $200 million to clone and gene-edit working dogs for American troops, police departments, and emergency services (via TechCrunch).

Read more
AI can describe a picture, but it still struggles to understand blind users
A University of Maryland study finds that Be My AI often buries useful answers in lengthy descriptions, leaving blind users to work harder to get the information they need.
Blind Man using walking stick

AI can describe a picture, identify objects, and answer questions about what a camera sees. But when a blind user needs a quick answer, getting an entire spoken essay about the scene isn't exactly helpful. Researchers at the University of Maryland (UMD) have found that AI-powered visual assistance can leave blind users doing too much work to get the information they actually need.

The study, titled Say It My Way: Exploring Control in Conversational Visual Question Answering with Blind Users, examined how people interact with Be My AI, an AI-powered feature of the Be My Eyes app. The researchers found that users often received lengthy descriptions that didn't adequately address their immediate goals, forcing them to ask follow-up questions or find ways to steer the AI towards a more useful answer.

Read more