Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. News

NASA just published its official report on last year’s Antares rocket explosion

Add as a preferred source on Google

After spending roughly eleven months independently investigating Orbital ATK’s botched Antares rocket launch, NASA has officially released an 11-page report detailing its findings on the spacecraft’s explosion. Conducted in earnest by twelve investigators (as well as 31 other NASA employees), the examination began a short time after the incident in November of 2014. Among the reported findings, the agency points to an explosion in one of the rocket’s main AJ26 engines, specifically in the engine’s liquid oxygen turbopump, as the catalyst for Orbital ATK’s failed mission.

As seen in the video above, very little went according to plan during the launch for Orbital ATK as its Orb-3 spacecraft succumbed to a fiery explosion mere seconds after takeoff. The rocket, which took off from NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility located in Virginia, was intended for use as a cargo resupply mission headed towards the International Space Station. Luckily for everyone at Orbital ATK and NASA, the Orb-3 was an unmanned spacecraft so no staff were reported injured or killed during the explosion.

Antares launch pad damage after the Orb-3's explosion
Antares launch pad damage after the Orb-3’s explosion NASA

By interviewing essential mission personnel and analyzing telemetry data and documents, NASA was able to piece together an accurate timeline of what exactly went wrong during the launch. Though it concluded which part of the rocket exploded, NASA wasn’t quick to point the finger at one specific reason why the chain reaction started. Unlike Orbital ATK (which believes it’s highly likely that a faulty, 40-year-old Soviet turbopump design led to the crash), NASA admitted to not having the ability to determine a single reason for the failure after concluding its analysis.

Recommended Videos

“The IRT was not able to isolate a single technical root cause for the E15 (the liquid oxygen turbopump) fire and explosion,” the report explains before listing three credible root causes which could’ve potentially led to the blast. “The IRT determined that all three of these technical root causes would need to be addressed as part of any return flight efforts for Antares.”

Though it refrained from crowning a bonafide culprit, NASA’s three potential causes don’t veer wildly from Orbital ATK’s assessment of a faulty turbopump design. The agency pointed to an inadequate design of the AJ26 liquid oxygen turbopump (which featured a sensitive thrust bearing), the possibility of foreign debris getting into the E15 turbopump engine area, and a workmanship or manufacturing defect of the liquid oxygen turbopump as the three likely causes.

“The thorough work of the NASA team is essential to ensure the agency continues to learn and improve,” associate administrator for the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate William Gerstenmaier said in a press release. “This unfortunate event provides a tremendous opportunity for the industry and NASA team to improve vehicle development, acquisition, and operations.”

During NASA’s investigation, Orbital ATK announced its intent to test new engines to replace the AJ26 for future Antares missions. In light of this announcement, the IRT also included several recommendations for supporting the planned testing, and to help reduce risk for Antares’ return to operation. NASA also made it a point to acknowledge Orbital ATK’s acceptance of responsibility for the mission failure and that “good working relationships” exist between Orbital ATK and NASA. That last part is incredibly paramount as the Antares rocket aims to resume mission activity at the Wallops Flight Facility in 2016.

Rick Stella
Former Associate Editor, Outdoor
Rick became enamored with technology the moment his parents got him an original NES for Christmas in 1991. And as they say…
Your holiday photos could help scammers figure out exactly where you are
AI can extract surprisingly precise location clues from innocent-looking Instagram and Facebook posts, making phishing scams much more convincing.
Photo on a holiday during sunset

That innocent holiday snap might be doing more than showing everyone how good the weather is. A new scam highlighted by The Guardian shows how criminals can use AI to analyse photos posted on Instagram and Facebook, work out where they were taken, and then use that information to make phishing messages look frighteningly legitimate.

The trick is surprisingly simple. Imagine posting a few family photos from Porto without mentioning the city anywhere. A few days later, a text arrives claiming that your bank detected unusual card activity while you were travelling in Porto and asking you to verify your details through a link. Because the message contains a detail that only someone who knows about the trip should know, it suddenly feels much more convincing. Except the scammer may never have known about the trip at all. The photo told them.

Read more
Meta and Google just got beaten by an AI giant you might not expect
Alibaba's Qwen AI model running on an Android phone.

The AI race usually revolves around familiar names like OpenAI, Google, Meta, and Anthropic. But when it comes to models developers can actually download and build upon, another company has raced to the front — and by quite some distance. Alibaba says its Qwen family of open-weight AI models has crossed 3 billion downloads globally over the past six months. That puts Qwen ahead of some of the biggest names in AI, including models from Meta and Google.

The difference is especially striking in Hugging Face data for 2026. Google’s open models have recorded around 418 million downloads, while Meta sits at roughly 227 million, according to Hugging Face’s latest State of Open Models report. Qwen, meanwhile, is becoming much more than one popular model. Alibaba has released more than 460 Qwen models, and developers have created over 300,000 derivative models from them.

Read more
Meta promised to stop creepy AI glasses videos, but they’re still all over Instagram
Instagram app

Smart glasses can be genuinely useful, whether you’re taking a hands-free photo, listening to music, or asking an AI assistant about whatever is in front of you. Unfortunately, putting a camera on someone’s face also opens the door to some much less pleasant uses. That’s becoming a problem for Meta.

Instagram head Adam Mosseri said in July that the platform was working to remove videos in which people use Meta glasses to film and harass others secretly. However, a new Business Insider investigation suggests the cleanup isn’t going quite as smoothly as Meta might have hoped. The publication found dozens of pickup and prank videos still available on Instagram weeks after Mosseri’s comments. Some came from popular or verified creators, and several showed women being approached and recorded in public through Meta glasses.

Read more