Skip to main content

The Big Tech antitrust hearing is today. Here’s why it matters

The CEOs of four of the biggest tech companies in the United States — Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google — will testify before Congress on Wednesday, which is investigating whether those companies are violating antitrust laws. It’s a dramatic escalation of the “techlash” that has been brewing the last few years, one that could lead to a massive shakeup of Big Tech. But what exactly is going on, and why should you watch?

What is antitrust?

Antitrust laws are how the United States regulates “the concentration of economic power,” as Cornell Law puts it. In the 19th century, numerous interstate industries were dominated by powerful monopolies (or “trusts” as they were called). These companies controlled so much of the markets for things like steel and oil that it was effectively impossible for competitors to challenge them, and they could dictate the market prices for products. That’s bad for small businesses and consumers.

Recommended Videos

The foundations of antitrust law in the U.S. are the Sherman Act of 1890 and the Clayton Act of 1914, which outlawed practices like price-fixing or mergers that remove competition from the markets.

Early in the 20th century, the government aggressively enforced antitrust regulations, but from the 1970s onward, economists, lawmakers, and the courts have been less enthusiastic about enforcement.

What’s behind this hearing?

Big Tech companies have grown vast and powerful over the last decade, and it seems as if lawmakers have only recently awoken to just how mighty they are. The House Judiciary Committee has launched an investigation of anticompetitive conduct in the tech space, and Wednesday’s hearing will be a chance for lawmakers to question the CEOs of these companies on their conduct. It’s the first time that all four of these executives will be testifying before Congress at the same time. Although it’s merely a hearing (the committee can’t break up Facebook at the end of it), information from this hearing it could swing the future of antitrust measures against these companies.

The CEOs, and why they’re under fire

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Tim Cook, Apple

The big issue with Apple is its App Store. For app developers who want to reach iOS users, the App Store is the gateway, and Apple charges a hefty entry fee of 30% of revenue. On top of that, Apple releases its own apps that compete with independent sellers on its marketplace. Spotify, for example, has argued that Apple’s 30% fee forces Spotify to increase the price of its app above that of Apple Music. Apple gets to sell a product and while effectively dictating what its competitors can charge.

Amazon Founder and CEO Jeff Bezos
Eric Baradat / AFP / Getty Images

Jeff Bezos, Amazon

Amazon is one of the world’s largest online platforms for merchants, and it also sells its own products on that platform. An investigation by The Wall Street Journal found that Amazon employees “used data about independent sellers on the company’s platform to develop competing products,” despite the company’s policy against doing that.

The antitrust argument against Amazon is that it uses its platform to figure out what products are working for independent sellers, then uses that data to develop similar products and box out their smaller competitors.

Mark Zuckerberg
Chip Somodevilla / Getty Image

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook

One major antitrust argument against Facebook is its habit of buying up competitors. According to The New York Times, that’s one angle the FTC is taking in its probe of the company: Facebook has bought more than 80 companies in 15 years, including Instagram, WhatsApp, and Giphy.

In gobbling up smaller social media platforms, Facebook ensures it has dominance over even users who don’t want to use Facebook. As Dina Srinivasan writes for Berkeley Business Law Journal, “Consumers effectively face a singular choice — use Facebook and submit to the quality and stipulations of Facebook’s product or forgo all use of the only social network used by most of their friends, family, and acquaintances.”

Facebook is also a dominating presence in advertising. Facebook and Google together control about 60% of the online ad market, according to Adweek. That duopoly effectively squeezes out the competition.

Google & Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai
Josh Edelson/Getty Images

Sundar Pichai, Google

Like Apple, Google has its own app store where it is both a player and the party making the rules. According to a report by The Information, Google employees monitor data on the usage of third-party apps on Google devices, then use that data to design Google-owned competitors.

Google is also an advertising juggernaut that, along with Facebook, consumes most of the pie in the ad industry. Attorneys general across the U.S. have launched probes into Google’s ad business, with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton saying that Google dominates “the buyer side, the seller side, the auction side, and the video side with YouTube.”

Will Nicol
Will Nicol is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends. He covers a variety of subjects, particularly emerging technologies, movies…
Sebastian Stan lays out Bucky’s future after Thunderbolts
Sebastian Stan in Thunderbolts.

There are some spoilers ahead for the ending of Marvel's Thunderbolts. Stop reading now if you don't want to be spoiled.

Earlier this year, Captain America: Brave New World briefly introduced a new direction for James "Bucky" Barnes, a character Sebastian Stan has been playing since 2011 in Captain America: The First Avenger. In Brave New World, the former Winter Soldier apparently retired from being a reformed hero and went into politics by running for Congress. Thunderbolts reveals that Bucky won his election to the House of Representatives. But his stay in Congress was short.

Read more
Jeep Compass EV breaks cover—but will it come to the U.S.?
jeep compass ev us newjeepcompassfirsteditionhawaii  4

Jeep just pulled the wraps off the all-new Compass EV, and while it’s an exciting leap into the electric future, there's a catch—it might not make it to the U.S. anytime soon.
This is a brand new electric version of the Jeep Compass, and being built on Stellantis' STLA platform—the same architecture underpinning models like the Peugeot E-3008 and E-5008—it looks much slicker and packs a lot more inside than previous versions of the Compass.
Let’s start with what’s cool: the new Compass EV is packing up to 404 miles of range on a single charge, a 74 kWh battery, and fast-charging that gets you from 20% to 80% in about 30 minutes. Not bad for a compact SUV with Jeep's badge on the nose.
There are two versions: a front-wheel-drive model with 213 horsepower and a beefier all-wheel-drive version with 375 horsepower. That AWD setup isn’t just for looks—it can handle 20% inclines even without front traction, and comes with extra ground clearance and better off-road angles. In short, it’s still a Jeep.
The design's been refreshed too, and inside you’ll find the kind of tech and comfort you’d expect in a modern EV—sleek, smart, and ready for both city streets and dirt trails.
But here’s the thing: even though production starts soon in Italy, Jeep hasn’t said whether the Compass EV is coming to America. And the signs aren’t promising.
Plans to build it in Canada were recently put on hold, with production now delayed until at least early 2026. Some of that might have to do with possible U.S. tariffs on Canadian and Mexican vehicles—adding a layer of uncertainty to the whole rollout.
According to Kelley Blue Book, a Stellantis spokesperson confirmed that the company has “temporarily paused work on the next-generation Jeep Compass, including activities at” the Canadian plant that was originally meant to build the model. They added that Stellantis is “reassessing its product strategy in North America” to better match customer needs and demand for different powertrain options.
So while Europe and other markets are gearing up to get the Compass EV soon, American drivers might be left waiting—or miss out entirely.
That’s a shame, because on paper, this electric Jeep hits a lot of sweet spots. Let’s just hope it finds a way over here.

Read more
Charlie Cox singles out his least favorite Daredevil: Born Again episode
Charlie Cox in Daredevil: Born Again.

Daredevil: Born Again season 1 was largely reconceived after the 2023 actor and writer strikes. Dario Scardapane -- a veteran of The Punisher series on Netflix -- was brought in to be the new showrunner and he made a lot of changes to the series that were well-received. However, there's one episode that Scardapane didn't really change at all, and it happens to be the least favorite episode of Daredevil: Born Again's leading man, Charlie Cox.

During an appearance on The Playlist, Cox noted that he wasn't very fond of the season's fifth episode, "With Interest," which was a largely standalone episode that featured his character, Matt Murdock, in a bank during a hostage crisis.

Read more