Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Emerging Tech
  3. Features

Digitizing your brain: Sci-fi pipe dream, or scientific possibility?

Add as a preferred source on Google
brain with computer text scrolling artificial intelligence
Chris DeGraw/Digital Trends, Getty Images

Imagine you’re nearing the end of your life. Your situation is dire, but you’re not ready to let go. Modern medicine can’t help you, so scientists digitize your brain and transfer your consciousness onto a computer so that you can continue on in the digital realm. Perhaps, as seen in the Black Mirror episode “San Junipero,” you’re transported to a digital city where you can mingle with other digital versions of people and live out your life as if nothing ever changed.

It sounds like science fiction, and as things currently stand, it is. Despite recent advances in both neuroscience and computing, we’re nowhere near being able to digitize a human brain — but many futurists are hoping we’ll get there within the next few decades. There’s even a nonprofit organization called the 2045 Initiative that’s dedicated to making it happen by (you guessed it) 2045.

Recommended Videos

Is such a thing even possible, though? To get an answer, we spoke with Susan Schneider, associate professor of philosophy and cognitive science and director of the A.I., Mind and Society (AIMS) Group at the University of Connecticut. She tells Digital Trends that people who believe we could one day literally transfer our minds to a computer may be misunderstanding the human mind.

“We’re still learning about the brain. We’ve learned a lot in the past two decades, but we still have a lot to learn.”

“When these transhumanists talk about uploading to survive death, they’re probably wrong,” Schneider says. “Even if the technology was perfect—I have a lot of qualms with the idea that it’s even something we can develop. I don’t think you would really survive. It would be like a computational duplicate of you. It wouldn’t really be you.”

Schneider says that there may be uses for creating a digital duplicate of yourself, and acknowledges that many people might want to do so before they leave this planet, but she’s skeptical that we could actually put anyone’s mind inside a computer. In fact, she’s not even sure if the digital duplicate would be truly possible.

“We’re still learning about the brain. We’ve learned a lot in the past two decades, but we still have a lot to learn. It’s not even clear, to be honest, if we will ever be able to measure all of the salient properties of the brain,” Schneider says. “If thinking depends upon quantum mechanical properties of the brain in some deep way, then it’s not clear that we could ever create a computational duplicate of you — even setting aside the issue of whether it’d really be you.”

John MacDougall / Getty

Schneider contends that the mind isn’t just a program that scientists or engineers can deconstruct and put back together in the digital space. She says it’s much more complicated than that, and therefore creating a perfect duplicate isn’t something we’re going to be capable of anytime soon.

To be fair, scientists have made some progress toward brain digitization, but the work that remains is staggering. In 2017, neuroscientists were able to map a worm’s 302 neurons and then simulate a worm brain to operate a Lego robot. It was an impressive feat, but it’s also hardly comparable to mapping a human brain and re-creating it digitally. The human brain has nearly 90 billion neurons. If you’re bad at math, that’s roughly 30 million times as big as the aforementioned worm brain.

Though Schneider isn’t currently convinced we’ll ever be able to transfer our minds onto a computer or duplicate our minds on a computer, she does admit it would be great if everyone could live as long as they choose to.

“Some people who believe that we should maybe not want to be immortal will say, ‘What would we do? We would grow bored. The mortality that we have is what makes life interesting—the fact that it’s short. Literally any minute, something could happen.’ I have to tell you I don’t appreciate that point,” Schneider says.

All things considered, it seems that the jury is out on whether we’ll ever be able to transfer or duplicate our minds with computers. What is clear, though, is that if we’re ever going to get to that point, it likely won’t be in our lifetimes. For now, digital immortality remains out of reach.

Thor Benson
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Thor Benson is an independent journalist who has contributed to Digital Trends, The Atlantic, The Daily Beast, NBC News and…
Claude Code can now browse the web without opening Chrome
The desktop app now includes an in-app browser that can read websites, click links, and interact with web apps.
Claude Code Featured

Developers spend a surprising amount of time bouncing between their code editor, browser tabs, API documentation, GitHub issues, and design files. Anthropic thinks Claude Code should simply do all of that without constantly asking users to switch windows. The company has announced a new in-app browser for Claude Code on desktop, allowing its AI coding assistant to open websites, read documentation, inspect designs, and interact with web pages directly from within the application.

A browser built into Claude Code

Read more
Apple is suing OpenAI over theft of trade secrets in blockbuster lawsuit
The lawsuit claims OpenAI recruited Apple employees and obtained confidential information about unreleased products.
Apple store Apple Building Apple Logo

For the past two years, Apple and OpenAI have been presented as close AI partners. ChatGPT powers key Apple Intelligence features, Siri can hand complex queries over to OpenAI, and together the two companies helped bring generative AI to millions of Apple devices. Now, that partnership has taken a dramatic turn.

What is Apple accusing OpenAI of?

Read more
Home robots can already walk. The hard part is stopping them from crushing your glassware
1X’s NEO uses tactile sensing and force control to handle fragile objects, aiming at the kind of household work humanoids still struggle to do.
Baby, Person, Electronics

A robot can look convincing while walking across a stage and still be useless in a kitchen. Picking up a wet glass demands precision, quick corrections, and enough restraint to avoid squeezing too hard. 1X is tackling that problem with new tendon-driven hands for NEO, its humanoid home robot.

1X says each hand has 25 degrees of freedom, with 22 across the fingers and palm and another three in the wrist. Its joints can yield when pushed instead of staying rigid, giving NEO a better chance of handling household objects without treating every collision like a wrestling match.

Read more