Skip to main content

‘Mirror’s Edge: Catalyst’ review

Mirror's Edge leaps for a sequel with 'Catalyst', but trips on the landing

mirrors edge catalyst review mirror s
‘Mirror’s Edge: Catalyst’
MSRP $59.99
“'Mirror's Edge: Catalyst' still has fun parkour, but fails as a compelling open-world game.”
Pros
  • Still has that fun parkour gameplay
  • A diverse cast of characters
Cons
  • Little variation in side-content
  • Bad “runners vision” UI
  • Extra modes and multiplayer feels tacked on
  • Open world doesn’t work for this game

The original Mirror’s Edge is one of the few games that truly deserves the title of “cult classic.” The 2008 first-person action game successfully adapted parkour to gaming during the height of the urban free-climbing sensation, which wowed critics and a small group of fans, but failed to reach a larger audience. For years, that small group of loyal, vocal fans have asked for more Mirror’s Edge; hoping, against all odds, that EA would allow DICE to shift some its resources away from Battlefield and give Mirror’s Edge another shot.

Be careful what you wish for.

Mirror’s Edge Catalyst, a narrative reboot of the original, gives fans pretty much everything a fan of the original could have asked for: More insight into its vaguely futuristic dystopia, a mega city called Glass, and the freedom to just run around and climb all over the world. There’s a little more combat, but not so much that it’s a “beat-em-up” or a “fighting” game. Most importantly, it returns to and builds on the first-person parkour mechanics that made the original so compelling.

And yet, by expanding Catalyst to meet fan expectations (and check off some game marketing bullet points), developer DICE turned a fresh experimental game concept from eight years ago and made it into a very modern open-world sandbox game. The original Mirror’s Edge was special in its time. Mirror’s Edge: Catalyst is not.

Wiping the mirror clean

Catalyst re-introduces players to heroine Faith Connors, an outlaw “runner” who eschews the control of the Conglomerate, a set of mega-businesses who employ, govern, and track the majority of the city. Where the original pretty much left it at that, Catalyst dramatically raises the stakes, putting Faith in the middle of a conspiracy that could lead to the end of free will for everyone in the world.

The open world does more harm than good, diluting the free-running experience.

Though DICE deserves kudos for cleverly remixing story elements from the original to fit and matter in the context of Catalyst’s more grandiose tale, it is very much a by-the-numbers “rebels fighting the empire” fare common among big-game storylines.

Narratively, the game’s strong suit is its refreshingly diverse cast: Faith and many of her core confidents are female and/or non-white. Though many of Catalysts’ characters aren’t there to generate any kind of narrative payoff, the world is simply more believable because it is so diverse.

Born to run

Like the narrative, the core construction Mirror’s Edge: Catalyst creates a much larger world for players to exercise and play with the game’s core mechanics. Instead of optimizing your path through a set level, Faith can now run freely throughout Glass.

Mechanically, it’s as simple as pressing the jump button whenever you plan to scale up — whether its jumping and launching off a railing, or running along a wall — or the crouch button to scale down, mostly by sliding under pipes. No matter the story context or the ultimate goal, most missions boil down to free running in the most effective, efficient way possible by quickly reading and reacting to the terrain. The game provides clues to let you when Faith should perform certain types of moves: If you see dirty footprints aligned horizontally, for example, chances are you should wall-run across them to reach a new path.

Independent of any other factors, free running across Glass feels intuitive and flows well. You will naturally leap from building to building, cutting through offices and rooftop patios to move forward. The few new mechanics, like swinging between large gaps using a grappling-hook-like MAGrope, are all natural additions to Faith’s core abilities.

Annoyingly, though the gameplay of Mirror’s Edge remains impressive, the new open-world, go-anywhere nature of the game often impedes your ability to find that true future-parkouring nirvana. The open world does more harm than good, diluting the free-running experience.

Wrong turn

While the game does leave clues suggesting how to traverse specific obstacles, there are no good options for communicating, on a macro level, how to get from point A to point B. Make no mistake: There are tools designed to help you get around, they just don’t work very well. The map, while useful for setting waypoints and fast travelling, does not show the actual paths and obstacles you need to figure out your way around.

In addition to the standard world map, Faith has “runner vision,” a point-by-point navigation system. Runner vision, as the game explains, shows you a route to your destination, but never the fastest one. At first glance, this seems like a perfect compromise: If reading the terrain is part of the game’s challenge, then it should be left to you to find the optimal path. This never works out, though, because the game does not do an adequate job setting mission-specific for you to riff on, or even clearly showing Faith’s next destination. Plus, Even if the runner’s vision were an efficient guide, the UI often focuses on smaller objects or a path that is not in your view.

The problems with runner’s vision make most of the game’s optional mission types quite frustrating, because the vast majority of them are timed. Whether you are running a “distraction” mission and bothering groups of security guards, or simply running a plain old timed “dash” route, so much of this game revolves are players figuring out paths that aren’t necessarily clear. It makes sense that a game whose primary mechanic is efficient movement would lean heavily on time trials, but there are only so many ways you can reframe the idea of quickly moving from point A to point B before you look desperate for ideas. The best missions are, uniformly, based around figuring a way or down a complex structure, without time constraints.

To counter-balance the repetitive nature of free running, Catalyst also features a slightly expanded combat system. In addition to taking down enemies with running and jumping attacks, Faith can simply fight enemies head-to-head with a pair of context sensitive attacks. In the context of running, the combat does work — seamlessly getting the jump on a guard mid-run feels very slick — but the game occasionally asks Faith to purposefully take down an area full of guards, which is just too much combat at once. While its clear you are supposed to figure out a sort of run that allows Faith to take out all of her enemies on the fly, some arena-like environments don’t lend themselves to that approach, and can turn into a messy 3D version of Punch-Out, with you figuring out which combination of punches and kicks won’t get blocked.

In general, many of Catalyst’s mechanics feel forced, or maybe included so that the marketing department can say they exist. Faith, for example, can earn experience, level up, and earn new abilities, but the progression feels bloated. Some of the skills, like the ability to roll at the bottom of a long jump, feel like they should be available from the beginning. Other mechanics, like a set of cards that explain each enemy-type’s strengths and weaknesses, feel like they were put in just to make the skill tree appear full.

Similarly, the game’s asynchronous multiplayer, which allows players to create their own runs and share them with friends, simply does not compare in scope or substance to the user-generated content features found in other games — even single-player focused ones.

Conclusion

Some games aren’t supposed to spawn sequels. Or reboots. Or become massive franchises. Not every idea can support the weight that falls on series like Call of Duty, The Legend of Zelda, or Assassin’s Creed. (Truth be told, even some of those franchises can’t really carry it, either.) By trying to make Mirror’s Edge: Catalyst attractive the wide audience it didn’t grab the first time around, this game lost some of its spark. Catalyst will not make you feel the thrill of the original Mirror’s Edge, nor will it make you feel something new. The parkouring that Mirror’s Edge fans want is in Catalyst, but you’ll have to climb over a lot of steep problems to enjoy it.

Editors' Recommendations

Mike Epstein
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Michael is a New York-based tech and culture reporter, and a graduate of Northwestwern University’s Medill School of…
TopSpin 2K25 serves up a fun, but safe tennis simulation revival
Serena Williams plays Tennis in TopSpin 2K25.

The first video game console I ever owned was an original Xbox that came bundled with two games: NCAA Football 2005 and Top Spin. My appreciation for both Madden and tennis games can be traced back to those being two of my first-ever console gaming experiences.

That’s why I was very excited to hear that Mafia 3 developer Hanger 13 and publisher 2K were bringing the Top Spin tennis series back with TopSpin 2K25 after a 13-year dormancy. Unfortunately, I'm disappointed with how underwhelming the overall product is. Even though it’s the series’ grand return after over a decade, it feels like an extremely iterative sequel to Top Spin 4. It’s certainly approachable, thanks to great tutorials and new meter systems to help players learn proper timing, but TopSpin 2K25's light content offering doesn't make for the strongest opening serve.
Top Spin returns
Developer Hanger 13 hasn’t been coy about the fact that it used 2011's Top Spin 4 as the base to build TopSpin 2K25. Top Spin 4 is a fantastic tennis game that people still play to this day, as it perfected the series’ timing-based gameplay. This isn’t like Mario Tennis Aces, where a special ability can shoot you across the court and hit timing doesn’t matter. TopSpin 2K25 is a true simulation, so learning proper positioning on the court, when to release a button to swing your racket, and how to aim your shot properly are all critical to success.

Read more
Embracer Group is splitting into 3 companies. Here’s who owns what
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Embracer, the embattled gaming company that went through a massive restructuring over the past year, just announced that it will split up into three different companies: Asmodee, Coffee Stain & Friends, and Middle-earth Enterprises & Friends.

If you need a refresher, Embracer Group gained a reputation for acquiring gaming IPs and studios, including everything from Borderlands' Gearbox Entertainment to Tomb Raider developer Crystal Dynamics to The Lord of the Rings' rights holder Middle-earth Enterprises. It functioned as one massive company separated into several operating groups. After a deal with Saudi Arabia's Savvy Group fell through last year, Embracer went through a massive period of "restructuring" where it laid thousands of developers off, shut down studios, and sold the likes of Saber Interactive and Gearbox. Now, it seems the saga of Embracer Group is nearing its end, as the company admitted in a press release "that the current Group structure does not create optimal conditions for future value creation both for Embracer Group’s shareholders and other stakeholders."

Read more
Hades 2: release date prediction, trailers, gameplay, and more
Melinoe standing in a stone circle.

Just like Zagreus' never-ending quest to escape the Underworld in Greek mythology, it seems we too are destined to continue fighting through new levels of demons and monsters in the sequel to the amazing roguelike Hades. We're not complaining, as that game was one of the best games released in 2020, and no one expected a sequel at all, let alone one announced so soon. Hades 2 will be the first sequel studio Supergiant Games have ever made, and it makes sense given how successful and popular the first game ended up being. Aside from some notable exceptions like Rogue Legacy 2 and Spelunky 2, not many roguelikes ever get a direct sequel, so there's a lot of mystery surrounding how Hades 2 will be different from the first game. But there's no need to dive into the depths of the Underworld yourself in search of answers, as we've pulled all the information we could from the jaws of Cerberus.
Release date

Hades 2 has no release date quite yet. However, the team has apparently been working on it since early 2021, and, just like the first, will come out first in early access. Supergiant has stated that details about this early access period would be revealed in 2023, however, that does not guarantee it will actually begin in 2023. The first Hades was in early access for almost two years, but we know that a slightly bigger team is working on Hades 2 from the start so this game may hit 1.0 a bit faster.
Platforms

Read more