Skip to main content

Nintendo’s Switch looks exciting, but here’s why I’m not going to buy it

Nintendo Switch
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Nintendo’s new console sounds pretty cool. Almost cool enough to buy.

It reminds me a lot of the time I spent in college with Nintendo’s momentarily game-changing motion-controlled experiment, the Wii, a console for which I camped out overnight in a Target parking lot during a near-freezing, mid-Michigan winter.

The Wii was instant fun, always sure to reel in a few friends on any given night of the week. With its motion-controlled games, it offered something other video games didn’t — a new kind of play experience that was novel and inventive. I was excited to see Nintendo pushing the envelope of what video games could be.

Watching Nintendo’s Tokyo press conference about the Switch, I was struck by that same initial excitement. It’s the Switch’s “Joy-Con” controllers that carry all the innovation, just like with the Wii. They’re packed with tech, sporting accelerometers and gyroscopes, infrared sensors and “Rumble HD,” which Nintendo says is precise enough to let you feel the difference between a virtual glass with one ice cube in it, and a glass with two.

I realized that Nintendo had created an interesting console, but probably not one I’d ever actually buy.

Nintendo also discussed titles like 1-2 Switch, a party game that’s fully dependent on its controllers and, letting you play out gunslinger duels and other quick, goofy activities. It looked like a fun experience — maybe fun enough to try to get a few friends in the same room to play a game, something I’ve struggled to do since Guitar Hero fell out of fashion.

The idea of using the Switch’s controllers to play with people, and not with digital representations of other people, also seems as though it could potentially open a breadth of new experiences. It’s the sort of idea that encourages game developers to reevaluate what they can do with digital interactive media.

But then the bit about Joy-Con ended, and my excitement dwindled. Soon, I realized that Nintendo had created what might be an interesting console, but probably not one I’d ever actually buy.

Good ideas going nowhere

The rest of Nintendo’s announcement showed game after (old) game. Hey, there’s Skyrim. And Minecraft. Oh nice, Mario Kart 8. And plenty of other games we’ve already seen.

Nintendo has been touting The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild for what feels like forever, but seeing as it’s also a Wii U title, there doesn’t seem to be anything about it that’s geared toward the Switch. We don’t know much about the newly announced Super Mario Odyssey, either, but we have no reason to believe it’s making special use of Joy-Con capabilities.

Switch packs a lot of the same tech as the Wii, but Nintendo doesn’t seem to be using it to field new game ideas. Despite the time spent talking about the Joy-Con controller, most of the Switch announcement was video game business as usual. Old games in the standard style, and sequels of the same.

I’ve already got a copy of Skyrim, and a copy of Minecraft. The console’s portability is nice, but not essential. If not the weird controllers, what’s Switch got for someone like me? It’ll be the only place to get Zelda and Mario — but does that mean it’ll be a console I fire up twice, and then consign to a corner of the entertainment center?

Deja vu

The tragic part about the Switch announcement is that Nintendo does come up with cool console ideas, and I often look back fondly on the early days of the Wii. I had a lot of fun with the machine, one that popped up at a perfect moment in my life to take advantage of nearby friends without a lot of obligations, and offered motion control as an exciting new development.

But 10 years later, motion control has been downgraded from wave of the future, to fleeting gimmick that pops up now and then. The tech is best used in games made for smartphones. Add to this the fact Nintendo hasn’t done a great job of keeping its consoles stocked with strong games. The last few Nintendo consoles have always been thin on titles, from birth to death, compared to Sony’s PlayStation or Microsoft’s Xbox.

Switch packs a lot of the same tech as the Wii, but Nintendo doesn’t seem to be using it for unique games.

By the end of the Switch announcement, I wasn’t thinking of my fun days with the Wii. I was thinking of its years collecting dust, years that started too soon after launch. There are good ideas in Nintendo’s new console, certainly, and maybe clever uses of technology that could offer something new to the video game landscape, but nothing Nintendo executives said on stage was enough to sell the idea that dropping more than $300 on this gaming machine would be a good investment.

The Switch needs more. A killer game, more imaginative than yet another take on Zelda, that warrants offering up the big cost of a new console — and one that specifically focuses on providing an experience that is unique, wholly, to Switch. Or a library that suggests a strong long-term return on the investment. Or other offers that add value, like free online play, or lower-cost accessories. So far, Nintendo’s offering none of those.

A lot of what Nintendo showed of its new console seems intriguing, and there’s no denying that there’s potential in the Switch. But I’ve banked on Nintendo potential before. And it wasn’t worth standing out in the cold

Editors' Recommendations

Phil Hornshaw
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Phil Hornshaw is an author, freelance writer and journalist living in Los Angeles. He is the co-author of The Space Hero's…
Oh no, I’m already obsessed with Nintendo Switch Sports golf
A golfer prepares to hit a ball in Nintendo Switch Sports.

After a grueling seven-month wait, golf has finally come to Nintendo Switch Sports. Better late than never, right?

Like the rest of the games included in Switch Sports, the version of golf included here is fairly straightforward. Players swing the joy-con to hit their golf ball, being careful not to overswing. There’s a little technique with curving, but it’s mostly a standard game loop of reading the wind, lining up a shot, and letting it rip. Nothing here is fundamentally different from the version of golf that was included in Wii Sports a decade and a half ago.

Read more
Nintendo’s mobile games are more influential than you might think
Alear and Marth open a door in Fire Emblem Engage.

Nintendo’s mobile games don’t get enough credit. While Nintendo had some undeniable hits like Pokémon Go and Fire Emblem Heroes, many consider the rest of its mobile efforts fairly underwhelming and even somewhat disappointing for a video game company of Nintendo’s stature. While nothing ever quite reached the high bar Pokémon Go set in 2016, Nintendo’s mobile games are a bit more influential than they get credit for.
Over the past few years, games like Pokémon: Let’s Go! Pikachu and Eevee, Animal Crossing: New Horizons, and Mario Kart 8 Deluxe have built upon their mobile counterparts. Then, during the September 13 Nintendo Direct, Fire Emblem Engage’s announcement and main gimmick cemented that Nintendo isn’t just viewing mobile games as a mostly failed side experiment. While they might not be the most successful games out there, their DNA is creeping into the Nintendo Switch’s bestselling titles.
Mediocre mobile returns
Nintendo’s mobile gaming efforts kicked off in the mid-2010s. Niantic created the AR game Pokemon Go, which quickly became a smashing success in 2016. In the six years since, the game has generated around 678 million installs and $6 billion in player spending, according to data from Sensor Tower.
While working with Niantic proved fruitful for The Pokemon Company, Nintendo partnered with DeNA for most of its initial mobile games. Unfortunately, none of these quite reached the heights analysts and Nintendo expected. Super Mario Run was a smash hit at launch but failed to sustain much interest and consistent revenue, so it’s considered a disappointment by Nintendo.
Meanwhile, other games like Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp, Mario Kart Tour, Dr. Mario World, and Dragalia Lost launched, and while they’ve still made lots of money for Nintendo, most haven't matched the success of the most popular mobile titles. The biggest exception to this is Fire Emblem Heroes, a gacha game where players can summon classic Fire Emblem characters. It’s had over $1 billion in player spending alone as of June 2022 and is Nintendo’s “flagship title on the [mobile} platform,” according to Sensor Tower.
More recently, Nintendo tried to recapture the success of Pokemon Go with Niantic’s Pikmin Bloom, although that game has reportedly disappointed as well. Overall, it’s understandable why some people are surprised to see only a couple of surefire mobile hits from a company with the pedigree of Nintendo and consider it a side venture that never realized its full potential. If you look closely at the console games in these series that Nintendo put out since, though, it isn’t ignoring everything learned while making mobile games.
Mobile's monumental impact
Nintendo has the masterful ability to find the strongest elements of an idea, draw those out, and then expand upon them to create something uniquely memorable. We’ve seen it do this time and time again with subsequent entries of its flagship series, but it’s a mindset it has applied to its mobile games upon closer inspection.
As far back as 2018, Pokemon: Let’s Go! Pikachu and Eevee recognized the charm of not needing to battle a Pokemon to capture it, and incorporated that into a traditional RPG experience. More recently, items and mechanics like gardening and cooking from Animal Crossing: Pocket Camp made their way into Animal Crossing: New Horizons and Mario Kart 8 Deluxe was able to revive its live service offerings by repurposing the best tracks and assets from Mario Kart Tour.
Fire Emblem Engage – Announcement Trailer - Nintendo Switch
The legacy of Nintendo’s mobile games could also be felt in the September 13 Nintendo Direct. The showcase’s first announcement was Fire Emblem Engage, which is turn-based strategy game where the main gimmick is being able to summon classic Fire Emblem characters with a ring. While it doesn’t look like Fire Emblem Engage goes full gacha, it’s clear that Nintendo recognized how people liked collecting and using classic Fire Emblem characters in a new adventure, so the developers drew and expanded upon that idea for Fire Emblem Engage.
Before the announcement of Pikmin 4, Shigeru Miyamoto also took a lot of time to highlight Pikmin Bloom. While we don’t know much about Pikmin 4’s gameplay, Nintendo could find some aspects of that game’s exploratory experience, weekly challenges, or something I’m not even thinking of to freshen up the next mainline game. The same could even happen with Super Mario Run the next time Nintendo decides to make a 2D Mario game.
While watching Fire Emblem Engage’s reveal during the latest Nintendo Direct, it became clear that Nintendo’s mobile games have quietly become influential forces in the company's console games. Nintendo has slowly plucked the best ideas out of them and brought them into Switch games without extra monetization. While the future is cloudy for Nintendo's seemingly stalled mobile push, I hope the company can still find a place for its games on mobile, using the platform as a space to experiment with its beloved series.

Read more
This jumbo Nintendo Switch screen is completely impractical and I low-key love it
A Switch in an Orion monitor displays Xenoblade Chronicles 3.

I have a soft spot for ridiculous gaming accessories. If I had to guess, I’m sure that fondness comes from my childhood, when I didn’t know the difference between an official peripheral and third-party junk. I can remember seeing ridiculous GameBoy screen magnifiers and wishing my parents would buy me one. Who cares if it made the handheld clunkier? I just thought it looked cool.

ORION by Up-Switch crowdfunding video. Mobile gaming just got bigger!

Read more