Skip to main content

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

The new HomePod is still too expensive, which is exactly how Apple wants it

Apple just announced its second-generation HomePod. And it did so without too much fanfare, via press release and just a day after it unveiled new M2 processors inside new a MacBook Pro and Mac mini. And while there maybe wasn’t much fanfare, there was plenty of flourish — also in typical Apple fashion — without divulging all that many details about what’s new.

Apple HomePod 2023 model.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s the lower price, of course, with $50 shaved off the first-gen HomePod price. The internals have been reworked some, though whether that’s to lower the overall cost, or just to make things better, remains to be seen. But It’s got a new S7 processor instead of the older (and less purpose-driven) A8. It’s got support for the Matter smart home standard and can listen for things like carbon monoxide alarms. And it’ll still play music and do other smart home stuff.

It’s also too expensive for most folks at $300. The catch is that the price probably doesn’t matter if you’re the sort who will be purchasing a new HomePod.

The new HomePod is a little less expensive, but still a smart speaker for the upper crust.

Consider, for a minute, the biggest competitors to the HomePod which, to be clear, is a premium smart speaker. This isn’t some $50 throwaway music maker. Amazon’s Echo Studio costs $200. A Sonos One is $219. Google’s awkwardly named Nest Audio isn’t quite in the same ballpark, but it’s $100, just for comparison’s sake. Or you could get Roku’s wireless speakers and wireless subwoofer for less than a single HomePod — and still have enough left over for lunch.

Does the new (or old, for that matter) HomePod do that much more than any one of those speakers? They all connect to the internet and do internet things, from music to smart home. (OK, Roku is really about home theater and not smart so much smart home.) They can all be paired with other speakers for whole-home audio, or (for Amazon and Sonos, anyway) paired with your television for audio.

Apple HomePod 2023 internals.
Meet the new HomePod — slightly less expensive, but still priced at a premium. Image used with permission by copyright holder

No, as is the case with Apple’s other products, you’re not just paying $300 for a smart speaker. You’re paying $300 for an Apple smart speaker. One (and again, just a single, standalone speaker) that ties into the larger Apple ecosystem in ways no competing speaker can do, from setup to everyday use. Put your iPhone next to the new HomePod and it’ll suggest things you can play. You can use the Find My feature on the speaker to find missing devices around your home. (Hopefully not too often.)

Give HomePod the benefit of the doubt and presume that it’ll have superior audio. But is it $100 better? For a single speaker? Maybe it is. Maybe your standards of what’s “better” just aren’t worth that much more money. Maybe you care less about Apple’s privacy and environmental lines and just want something that works well enough, if not as close to perfect as can be.

It’s the totality of the product that lets Apple charge that much more than its competitors. Also just the company’s sheer size — it can afford to sell fewer of these things, though even that doesn’t make it immune from being deemed less than a success, as was the case with the original HomePod.

Will this new model suffer the same fate? Good — great, even — though at a price that simply was too high for the market to bear?

We’ll start to see after February 3, when the second-generation HomePod is released.

Editors' Recommendations

Phil Nickinson
Section Editor, Audio/Video
Phil spent the 2000s making newspapers with the Pensacola (Fla.) News Journal, the 2010s with Android Central and then the…
Price of Apple’s old AirPods drop to $129 with release of new model
Apple AirPods Pro

Apple's new AirPods (aka AirPods 3) are now officially official. And they look great at $179. But the price-conscious among us will note that the retail price is higher than that of the AirPods they're replacing. That said, they come with wireless charging (and MagSafe!) out of the box.

So what does that mean for the second-generation AirPods they're replacing? That's not entirely clear. Figure at some point, Apple will quit selling them. But not just yet. And is often the case when an Apple product gets supplanted by something new, the Gen 2 AirPods are getting a price break and will now be available at $129.

Read more
Apple’s new $179 AirPods: Head-tracking spatial audio and longer battery life
Woman wearing the new Airpods Gen 3 featuring adaptive eq.

After more than a year of speculation, the newest AirPods are here. Apple announced them at the company's October 18 Unleashed event, alongside the new Macbook Pro. The new version -- simply called AirPods (third-generation) -- cost $179, which places them between the entry-level AirPods (which Apple will continue to sell for $129) and Apple's $249 AirPods Pro. Preorders start today, with the new AirPods shipping the last week of October.

As speculated, the new AirPods use a design that's based on the AirPods Pro, with a shape that channels sound into your ear with better precision, but without using the silicone eartips that the AirPods Pro use -- good news for folks who have always appreciated the semi-open design of the original AirPods.

Read more
Wait — where were the new AirPods at Apple’s latest event?
airpods pro

Another Apple event has come and gone. And it was a good one. We got a stylish new Apple Watch Series 7. We got updated WatchOS software that makes the new watch a must-have for cyclists. We got a refreshed iPad and (perhaps more important) iPad Mini. We got the iPhone 13, plus its Mini and Pro versions. We got some cool stuff coming to Apple Fitness+.

What we did not get was anything remotely resembling AirPods, rumor mill be damned.

Read more