Skip to main content

Apple favored search results for its own App Store apps over more relevant ones

If you searched for an app in Apple’s App Store over the past year, chances are good that one of the first results showed you software made by Apple, even if it had little to do with what you were searching.

A New York Times investigation into the App Store suggests that Apple has favored its own apps over those made by third parties. The paper analyzed search terms within the App Store and found that Apple’s own apps ranked first for at least 700 different search terms within the store. That research was compiled by app analytics firm Sensory Tower, which found that in some cases the App Store would show as many as 14 diffferent Apple apps before showing apps made by rival companies, with the exception of those that paid Apple for ad placement.

Recommended Videos

The Times found similar results as a similar investigation by The Wall Street Journal in July.

Apple’s questionable App Store practices have come under fire as antitrust scrutiny against Big Tech continues to ramp up. In May, the Supreme Court voted to allow a class action lawsuit against the company, suggesting that the App Store rules represented a monopoly.

Apple executives reportedly told The Times that Apple apps were shown as the top results in the store for a number of searches for over a year; however the company has since tweaked the algorithm so that fewer Apple apps appear in the top search results with the store. On July 12th, many Apple app’s rankings dropped sharply after the change.

The issue lies in the fact that by pushing its own apps to the top of search results, Apple was able to potentially influence how many of its own apps were downloaded by customers. While it is obvious that the algorithm worked in Apple’s favor in this case, the company has not explained how its algorithm works other than to say that it is not manually altered to benefit Apple. Instead, the company says the apps are shown high in search results because the apps are popular and their generic names tend to be a closer result for some broad search terms.

So many Apple apps would often shown up in search results, according to Apple, because the algorithm interpreted a search for a generic app like “Podcasts” for instance, to be an attempt to find other apps by the same developer as the “Podcasts” app — which in this case is Apple — even if they weren’t a podcast app.

When someone searched for “Music” the app would default to Apple Music because users clicked on it so frequently. Inversely, the same thing happens when you search for “Office.” In that case the algorithm will surface a number of Microsoft apps.

The App Store generated $50 billion in sales for Apple last year. It has said that two thirds of those sales originated in search.

Emily Price
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Emily is a freelance writer based in San Francisco. Her book "Productivity Hacks: 500+ Easy Ways to Accomplish More at…
This app will literally have you touch some grass to unlock bad apps
An app that detects when users touch grass.

In 2023, the Office of the Surgeon General (OSG) released a social media and youth mental health advisory, noting that a staggering 95% of teenagers, between 13 and 17 years of age, report using social media 'almost constantly.'

“People with frequent and problematic social media use can experience changes in brain structure similar to changes seen in individuals with substance use or gambling addiction,” said the detailed report, citing research.

Read more
It’s time for Apple, Samsung and Google to solve the eSIM problem
Nano SIM card in SIM card tray from iPhone 14 Pro Max.

When Apple launched the new iPhone 16e on Wednesday, the Apple Store in every region displayed one thing under connectivity: eSIM. There was no mention of a physical SIM, and I had a waking nightmare that Apple had quietly pulled the plug, and every iPhone 16e globally would be sold as an eSIM-only model.

A quick search — and a look at the photos — confirmed that this hadn’t happened, but my reaction kickstarted a thought about eSIMs, their promise (and what we were promised), and the current state of eSIMs globally. I’ve been traveling for the past month, and eSIMs are an absolute mess. The potential was immense, but it goes against carriers’ interests to make it any easier, but there is a solution.

Read more
Changing this one thing would have made the iPhone 16e much more fun
iPhone 16e in white.

What a shame the Apple iPhone 16e isn’t more fun. I don't mean exciting, and I’m not talking about the specification, or that a modem is the most technically interesting aspect (it’s important, but modems are inherently a bit dull) of the phone. I mean fun, and I’m specifically talking about it coming in only two colors, and the ones Apple chose are as vanilla and ordinary as you can get.
Two colors

The iPhone 16e is available in black or white. These are the most Apple colors it could have chosen, and fitting as the brand which arguably launched the white smartphone craze in 2008 with the iPhone 3G, when it joined the safe choice black iPhone 3G. What’s old is new again, but things have moved on since the days of a white iPhone capturing attention. Apple has actually moved on too, as we'll soon show, which makes the whole situation feel out of place. There just can’t be any fanfare around a new 2025 iPhone where the choice is either boring black, or overdone white.

Read more