Skip to main content

Facebook leaves iPhone and WP8 users Homeless

Facebook leaves iOS and WP8 users Homeless
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There have been app exclusives in the past. Rovio’s Angry Birds took a while to leave iOS, as did Instagram, and the Twitter-backed Vine video social network is still only found on Apple’s operating system. Notice a trend here? Of course you do. The Apple-first mentality of most developers is well-known. Android has a new ally, though. Despite long-standing tensions with Google, Facebook has bucked the trend of developing for iOS first and truly exploited Android’s openness. Facebook Home is an Android exclusive.

For years, the benefit of Android’s open-source nature for regular people has been questioned (even by our own Matt Smith), and the silly, and sometimes strange user interfaces most manufacturers create and place over the top of Google’s OS dismissed as needless marketing gimmicks. For all the complaining though, Facebook Home is only possible because Android is open source and has a history of, well, looking strange. Changing the way someone’s Android phone works may not prove all that jarring because many users will have had varying experiences anyway, particularly if they’ve owned multiple devices all produced by different manufacturers. An HTC phone, for example, has a completely different interface from a Samsung. Factor in the many ways Google itself has fundamentally changed the look of Android in the last few years and you get our point.

Recommended Videos

Apple and Microsoft’s desperation to control the mobile experience has seen them shut out of what could become one of the most important industry partnerships we’ll see this year. iPhone and Windows Phone users will not get Facebook Home. But will being ‘Homeless’ cause the two rival firms to feel a similar pain?

The number of potential new Android users is staggering

To understand why Facebook Home on Android is such a very big deal, let’s look at some numbers, starting out with an example from earlier: Instagram. Recently it announced nearly half its 100 million users are Android owners, and that’s after just a year of being available in Google Play.

One hundred million users is a lot, especially for a filter-happy, photo-sharing social network, and it’s a perfect example of how quickly a hot app can gain traction over a short space of time on Android. However, it’s dwarfed by Facebook’s one billion active members, 680 million of which access the site using a mobile device. Statistics indicate 470 million of them use an app to do so, leaving 210 million (the rest of us) using a mobile Web browser.

Finally, some independent research has shown in 2012, Facebook was used by around 190 million Android owners, following incredible growth from 66 million in 2011. Facebook fans were already flocking to Android even before Facebook Home’s arrival. The same research showed iOS had 147 million users. Sadly, Windows Phone’s numbers aren’t even worth mentioning.

All this is hardly surprising given Android’s performance over the last year. According to research carried out by Gartner, 144 million Android phones were sold during the final quarter of 2012 alone, accounting for nearly 70 percent of the market. A few quick sums based on some of these numbers indicates 490 million members of Facebook’s mobile army currently don’t use Android. This is where the potential for domination lies. If Facebook can convince its avid users on iPhone and Windows Phone to convert to Android to use Facebook Home, it may make more money and have happier users.

Apple and Microsoft left out in the cold?

Google, which must surely be welcoming Home with open arms, is probably chuckling to itself, knowing there’s nothing Apple and Microsoft can do about it either. In an interview with Fortune, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg addressed the problem of getting Home onto Apple’s iOS, saying, “They really control the operating system,” and, “We’d love to offer this on iPhone and we just can’t today.” Nobody bothered to ask about Windows Phone, but the response would be the same.

But do iOS and Windows Phone users want Facebook Home? Facebook would tell you yes, but the answer is impossible to give at the moment. It may depend on how awesome (or not) it turns out to be once it launches. Still, one could argue that Facebook Home is fairly well replicated on iOS already. You can take a picture, tap share, and can send it to Facebook straight away. Pull down the notification center and you can post a status update. All of this without opening the official Facebook app.

It’s a similar story with Windows Phone, where Facebook is a key part of the experience, from the People Hub to the Live Tiles, and the seamless integration of contacts, status updates and profile pictures. The social (people first) nature of Windows Phone is one of its major selling points, not that anyone seems to care much yet. With Facebook already a major part of iOS and Windows Phone, we’d imagine only the most hardcore Facebook fan is going to be putting their phone on Craigslist tonight, ready to pre-order an HTC First tomorrow.

If Home’s a hit, Homelessness will hurt

Of course, this could change if Facebook Home is a hit, and it already has the benefit of being free, so it’s easy to attract users willing to give it a shot. However, Facebook needs to make money, and it does so using ads, so will they be a part of Home? Not yet, but according to Zuckerberg, they’re coming and when they do, they’ll be part of Cover Feed. Presumably they’ll appear as sponsored news stories, just like they do in the Web-based News Feed. Almost everybody hates ads, so Facebook will have to be very careful with the way they’re implemented, or it could see Home shed users as quickly as it gains them.

Zuckerberg quoted figures saying the average Facebooker spends 25 percent of their mobile time using Facebook and Instagram. He then described Facebook Home as the best possible Facebook experience. If he’s right, every single one of those users who want to have the best will be wanting an Android phone. Being Homeless just became a serious concern for Apple and Microsoft; Home could be a compelling reason for a few hundred million Facebook mobile users to choose Google’s operating system next time they buy a phone.

Andy Boxall
Andy is a Senior Writer at Digital Trends, where he concentrates on mobile technology, a subject he has written about for…
The iPhone 18 may get a big redesign you won’t be able to see
The back of the Apple iPhone 16 Plus.

The design of the iPhone can only be described as iconic. That rectangular shape has been a major influence on phone aesthetics and design since the first iPhone came onto the market back in 2007, and that isn't likely to change. The internal design of the iPhone might radically shift, however. Apple is supposedly planning to change how the iPhone hardware is designed to accommodate better AI performance.

Essentially, Apple wants to use discrete memory rather than integrated memory. Those are technical terms that basically mean separate and together. On the internal system on a chip (SoC), any memory that is stacked on top is considered integrated memory. Discrete memory would be RAM that is packaged separately from the SoC. If reports are correct, Apple will begin using discrete memory in 2026, and the shift would result in faster memory and better AI performance, according to The Elec.

Read more
I did an iPhone 16 Pro vs. iPhone 6s camera test, and the results blew me away
An iPhone 6S alongside an iPhone 16 Pro.

The iPhone 16 Pro has amassed quite some enviable reputation as a pocket camera powerhouse, and for good reasons. This time around, Apple focused as much on “prosumer” features as it did on tricks that an average person won’t have a hard time figuring out.

Take the new Photographic Styles system, for example. I have been equally impressed with the new 4K/120-frames-per-second capture mode with the audio mixing system in tow. All that revelry got me wondering just how far we’ve come in terms of iPhone photography within the span of a decade.

Read more
Face ID could get a big upgrade on the iPhone 17. Here’s what might change
Face ID tick icon on the iPhone 14 Pro's Dynamic Island.

Over the years, various rumors have indicated that Apple plans to integrate Face ID technology into the display of a future iPhone. Now, the company has been granted a U.S. patent covering the technology capable of achieving this integration. This development suggests that the feature could be introduced on at least one model in the upcoming iPhone 17 series, which is set to launch next year.

The patent, reported by Patently Apple, details the intricate placement of cameras and other sensors behind an active display part. This innovation might finally eliminate the need for the notorious iPhone notch/pill cutout that has characterized recent models.

Read more