iPhone coming to Sprint? CEO Dan Hesse has ‘no comment’

By Jeffrey Van Camp January 14, 2011

iphone-4-sprint — Image used with permission by copyright holder

Sprint isn’t the dying carrier it once was. For the last year it’s been patching its wounds and actually added new subscribers in the third and (presumably) fourth quarters of 2010. But is it ready for the iPhone? According to Reuters, Sprint CEO Dan Hesse was asked about the chances of the iPhone coming to Sprint. Apple representatives have said that the iPhone agreement with Verizon is not exclusive. Since Verizon and Sprint both use CDMA technology, it’s reasonable to wonder if a deal is in the works. Hesse refused to comment, saying that Sprint does not speak about conversations it has with third parties.

Sprint wants the iPhone, that’s for sure. The company has used the iPhone and iPods in its promotional materials for a while now. When the company launched its 4G network, it aired a commercial showing the iPhone tethered to Sprint’s network over Wi-Fi with the message “make your iPhone 4G.” It has occasionally used other Apple products in its ads. For years, Sprint has been trying to energize its subscribers with a device like the iPhone. The Samsung Instinct was one of its first attempts. The HTC Evo is one of its most recent.

But would a move to Sprint be a smart move for Apple? The iPhone is now available on the two largest carriers: AT&T and Verizon Wireless. If the iPhone becomes available on all major carriers, it could diminish Apple’s brand or cause the company to lose its ability to force carriers to dance its way. Still, Sprint has somewhere around 50 million subscribers. T-Mobile–a GSM carrier like AT&T–has somewhere around 35 million (estimates) last we heard.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Jeffrey Van Camp

Former Digital Trends Contributor

As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…

Mobile

3 reasons why I’ll actually use Anker’s new iPhone power bank

A person holding the Anker MagGo Power Bank.

Power banks are a necessary evil, and even if you don’t consider yourself a “power user” who's likely to drain a phone’s battery in less than a day, there will be times when one comes in handy. And when I am forced to carry one, I want it to be as helpful and versatile as possible.

I’ve been trying Anker’s MagGo Power Bank 10K -- meaning it has a 10,000mAh cell inside it -- and there are three reasons why I'm OK with it taking up valuable space in my bag.
It has a screen on it

Mobile

Here’s how Apple could change your iPhone forever

An iPhone 15 Pro Max laying on its back, showing its home screen.

Over the past few months, Apple has released a steady stream of research papers detailing its work with generative AI. So far, Apple has been tight-lipped about what exactly is cooking in its research labs, while rumors circulate that Apple is in talks with Google to license its Gemini AI for iPhones.

But there have been a couple of teasers of what we can expect. In February, an Apple research paper detailed an open-source model called MLLM-Guided Image Editing (MGIE) that is capable of media editing using natural language instructions from users. Now, another research paper on Ferret UI has sent the AI community into a frenzy.

Mobile

There’s a big problem with the iPhone’s Photos app

The Apple iPhone 15 Plus's gallery app.

While my primary device these days continues to be my iPhone 15 Pro, I’ve dabbled with plenty of Android phones since I’ve been here at Digital Trends. One of my favorite brands of phone has been the Google Pixel because of its strong suite of photo-editing tools and good camera hardware.

Google first added the Magic Eraser capability with the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, which is a tool I love using. Then, with the Pixel 8 series, Google added the Magic Editor, which uses generative AI to make edits that wouldn’t be possible otherwise. There are also tools like Photo Unblur, which is great for old photographs and enhancing images that were captured with low-quality sensors.